This summary was prepared by Hamed Kioumarsi, EBM at Springer Nature, in collaboration with Farshad Ganji (Software Development Department, İstanbul Aydın University, Istanbul, Türkiye) and Fatma Yaprakdal (Information System Engineering Department, Bucak Computer and Informatics Faculty, Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Burdur, Türkiye).
Citation: Kioumarsi, H., Ganji, F., & Yaprakdal. F. (2026). Climate Change Research: Bridging Disciplines for Sustainable Solutions. Springer Nature Communities. https://go.nature.com/4jJd7VN
Introduction
Climate change can certainly be considered an example of a problem which is no longer confined within the scope of the discipline that deals with it. These are environmental, ecological, agricultural, economic, technological, social, and public health problems. The list of problems arising from the rapid changes happening in the Earth’s system includes temperature rise, fluctuations in precipitation, weather extremities, loss of biodiversity, food security issues, water shortages, soil erosion, and impacts on human health. It must be stressed that climate, ecosystems, biodiversity, society, adaptation, mitigation, and sustainable development are interconnected aspects. This implies that future progress in climate science will not be defined only by gaining new scientific knowledge.
From disciplinary research to integrated climate science
Conventional scientific investigation has been based on rather separate disciplines. Climate scientists study processes in the atmosphere and physical phenomena, environmental scientists study the reactions of the ecosystem and pollution, agricultural scientists study agriculture and food systems, economists study markets and incentives, while social scientists study human behavior and institutions. Each one of these perspectives is important, but climate change does not recognize disciplinary boundaries.
Agriculture is an excellent example of such a situation. Drought is not merely an atmospheric phenomenon but may have an impact on the availability of water for irrigation, crops and livestock production, soil and food prices, as well as additional pressures on ecosystems. An increase in temperature will affect the phenology of crops, livestock production, pest and diseases dynamics, the need for water, as well as species of agricultural crops. Such a comprehensive understanding can be achieved through cooperation between climatologists, agronomists, soil scientists, animal scientists, ecologists, hydrologists, economists and social scientists.
Scientists claim that the problem of climate change is a multidisciplinary issue because climate hazards affect all spheres such as environment, technology, economy and society. It is especially applicable for the sphere of agriculture as climate adaptation should take into account biological and socioeconomic issues of farmers and food system.
The multidisciplinary research cannot be limited only by gathering people from various fields in one team. Multidisciplinary includes such components as common problems, methods and databases as well as communication between scientists. Other scientists also stress the need for inter- and multidisciplinary climate research.
Agriculture as both a climate-vulnerable sector and a solution
Agriculture is a unique sector in climate studies because it plays two roles simultaneously, being very vulnerable to climate change and being an integral part of climate mitigation. Agricultural production can be impacted by changes in temperature, precipitation, droughts, floods, heat waves, and weather events.
At the same time, agriculture itself can impact greenhouse gas emissions and carbon sequestration in various ways. As such, agriculture is a unique scientific discipline which connects climate and environmental sciences. Climate smart agriculture, agroecology, conservation agriculture, improved irrigation, integrated crop and livestock farming, agroforestry, improved soil management and precision agriculture can be used for adaptation and mitigation.
Soil science becomes especially important. Poor soil management, degradation, erosion, over tillage and improper water use can reduce resilience and increase environmental stresses. As such, climate science should pay increasing attention to soil science along with agronomy, hydrology, ecology, and environmental modeling.
The study of livestock systems requires an interdisciplinary approach. Climate change can affect animal welfare, heat stress, feed availability, fertility and productivity. The activities in livestock farms can generate greenhouse gases. The study of sustainable livestock production requires collaboration with veterinarians, nutritionists, climatologists, environmental scientists, and economists.
Climate change, biodiversity, and environmental science
Climate change is inseparable from loss of biodiversity and environmental degradation. The forests, wetlands, grasslands, soil, rivers, oceans, and the agricultural lands regulate carbon and water cycles and deliver necessary ecosystem services for human societies. On the other hand, climate change, pollution, habitat destruction, and unsustainability in resource utilization may impair these systems.
Environmental sciences can provide an indispensable framework for analyzing these interactions. This branch of science relates the processes in the atmosphere with soil, water, biodiversity, pollution, land use, and ecosystems' functioning. Environmental monitoring can show how climate impacts the ecosystems, and remote sensing and geographic information systems can assist researchers in studying changes in vegetation, soil moisture, forest cover, water resources, and land use.
The interaction of biodiversity conservation and sustainable development is crucial for climate research. Scientists emphasize the need to relate wildlife and biodiversity conservation with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) adopted by the United Nations. Analysis shows that the biodiversity conservation must not be viewed as an environmental goal but as an element of sustainable development.
For this situation, Agroforestry and agricultural landscapes have an important role to play. Agricultural landscapes and agroforestry cover much of the terrestrial ecosystem and can result in biodiversity conservation or biodiversity destruction depending on the way they are used. Monoculture farming, habitat fragmentation, excessive use of pesticides, and degradation of the soil are among the factors that may reduce ecological resilience, while agroforestry, crop diversity, IPM, and conservation are among the factors that may help.
Food, water, energy, and environmental sustainability
The relationship between food, water, energy, and ecosystems explains why nexus-based climate research has become so necessary. Expansion of irrigation might enhance food production but exacerbate water stress and energy usage. Production and use of fertilizers could help achieve food security but could be responsible for greenhouse gas emissions and pollution of water sources. The utilization of bioenergy could help reduce carbon footprints but could also conflict with food and biodiversity when there is a lack of space.
Scholars emphasize that nexus-based methods allow finding synergies and tradeoffs which cannot be revealed if the food, water, energy, and environment sectors are considered separately. Scholars have also shown the interdependence of food, trade, and water sectors globally.
These relationships are especially important for developing countries, as their agricultural communities may have limited access to irrigation, climate information, financial resources, improved technologies, and adaptation infrastructure. Climate research should therefore combine environmental modelling with socioeconomic analysis to identify solutions that are technically effective but also affordable and accessible.
Climate action, agriculture, and net-zero development
Net-zero emissions constitute another realm in which agricultural and environmental sciences need to collaborate with energy and technology studies. Scientists underline the need for concerted climate action in order to reach net-zero emissions. They also discuss global ways to achieve net-zero emissions through technologies, issues, and prospects for the future.
Besides the approaches mentioned above, agriculture may contribute to achieving net zero through carbon sequestration in soils, agroforestry, restoration of degraded lands, fertilization, reduction of food losses and waste, renewable energy sources, livestock management, and many others. However, it should be noted that all of these practices need to be carefully thought through since carbon sequestration is neither infinite nor everlasting. Moreover, some mitigation measures based on land use may have a negative impact on the productivity of agriculture and biodiversity.
Here, the involvement of environmental science becomes crucial, as the environmental impact assessment will reveal whether or not the chosen mitigation practice reduces the pressure on the environment and only shifts it to other parts of the system.
Connecting natural and social sciences
Climate change is both a problem of humans and nature. Technologies such as renewable energy, precision farming, carbon technologies, restoration of ecosystems, and climate-smart infrastructure are crucial, but their effectiveness relies on institutions, economic motivation, culture, acceptance by people, governance, and human behavior.
It is shown by scientists that climate mitigation approaches through demand require shifts in consumption, transportation, building and others, and thus necessitate knowledge beyond technological inventions. The situation is similar in agriculture: farmers have climate-smart technologies, but they do not necessarily use them because of various reasons including cost, risk, lack of information, tenure of the land, market conditions, or absence of institutions.
Co-production of knowledge thus becomes highly relevant. Scholars claim that sustainability research will be more effective if researchers collaborate with practitioners, policy makers, and others who hold knowledge. For instance, farmers, indigenous peoples, environment managers, and local organizations can contribute knowledge complementary to science-based measurement and modeling.
From knowledge production to practical solutions
One of the key issues with climate research is the disconnect between scientific knowledge and its implementation. Not necessarily there is a lack of climate research in the world, but the scientific knowledge itself is scattered across multiple fields, institutions, nations, and policy structures.
The next step in climate research must focus on practical use of scientific knowledge. Agricultural researchers need to work with farmers and environmental scientists, climate scientists need to cooperate with hydrologists, ecologists need to collaborate with land use planners, and economists and policy makers need to be engaged in research activities and not just get scientific results in the end.
This change can be supported with universities and research institutions through the creation of interdisciplinary centers for climate and sustainability research and collaboration between agriculture, environmental science, engineering, economics and social sciences.
Digital technologies can strengthen this process. Remote sensing, AI, Earth-system modelling, big-data analytics, geographic information systems, and precision agriculture can connect large data sets across environmental and agricultural systems. However, technological capacity should complement rather than replace field observations, local knowledge, and participatory research.
Toward a new generation of climate research
Climate research for the next decade and beyond must shift from fragmented inquiries to systems thinking. Scientists should not only ask "What is changing?" but "Why is it changing?,"
This is exemplified by the literature in recent times. Multidisciplinary cooperation forms the core of climate science research, with the realization of the link between climate action and the overall problem of attaining net-zero emissions. Further showing that biodiversity and wildlife conservation should be part of sustainable development and climate considerations.
Agricultural and environmental science research should be at the forefront of this shift. Food production cannot be divorced from climate, soil, water, biodiversity, and ecological well-being. Just as environmental management cannot be divorced from the needs of the farmer and rural communities. Any sustainable intervention will try to achieve an equilibrium between these concerns.
Finally, integration of disciplines is not just academic; it is a necessity. As problems such as climate change transcend disciplines from atmosphere sciences, ecology, agriculture, economics, technology, and society, so must solutions. A climate research agenda should be connected to climate science, agriculture, environment science, conservation, food and water security, energy transition, healthcare, economics, governance, and education. It is not an intention to replace the expertise of scholars with an integrated discipline approach. Climate science needs agronomy and ecology, agriculture needs hydrology and environment sciences, engineering needs economics and social sciences, and policymakers need scientific information that is understandable to them. When all these disciplines converge, research will no longer focus on threats of climate change but rather start finding scientific, environmental, socially acceptable, economically realistic, and local solutions.
The future of climatology will be the future of turning knowledge into cooperation, cooperation into solutions, and solutions into action. That means that the future of climatological studies is not only about understanding what is happening to our planet but about the development of the interdisciplinary skills that will allow us to create sustainable agriculture, ecosystems, sources of food and water and sustainable world overall.
References
Aeschbach, N. (2026). Fostering transformative climate action through the integration of transdisciplinary research and university teaching. npj Climate Action, 5, Article 32. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-026-00360-8
Creutzig, F., Roy, J., Lamb, W. F., Azevedo, I. M. L., Bruine de Bruin, W., Dalkmann, H., Edelenbosch, O. Y., Geels, F. W., Grubler, A., Hepburn, C., Hertwich, E. G., Khosla, R., Mattauch, L., Minx, J. C., Ramakrishnan, A., Rao, N. D., Steinberger, J. K., Tavoni, M., & Weber, E. U. (2018). Towards demand-side solutions for mitigating climate change. Nature Climate Change, 8, 260–263. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0121-1
Caniglia, G., Luederitz, C., von Wirth, T., Fazey, I., Martín-López, B., Hondrila, K., Schäpke, N., & Lang, D. J. (2021). A pluralistic and integrated approach to action-oriented knowledge for sustainability. Nature Sustainability, 4, 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00616-z
Herziger, A., & Hurst, K. F. (2025). The role of cross- and interdisciplinary climate research centres. Nature Climate Change, 15(3), 228–230. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-025-02249-6
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Working Group I contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/
Kioumarsi, H., Amrulloh, H., Sarsozo, M., Fatiqin, A., & Shariman Yahaya, Z. (2025). Addressing climate change requires a multidisciplinary approach. Journal of Biotropical Research and Nature Technology, 4(1), 48–51. https://doi.org/10.52850/borneo.v4i1.23071
Kioumarsi, H., Naseri Harsini, R., Özbey, B. G., Rafiei, B., Alidoust Pahmedani, M., Shariman Yahaya, Z., & Rosen, M. A. (2026a). Wildlife, biodiversity, and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals: Synergizing conservation and development for a sustainable future. European Journal of Sustainable Development Research, 10(2), Article em0367. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejosdr/17816
Kioumarsi, H., Rosen, M. A., Rafiei, B., Shariman Yahaya, Z., Naseri Harsini, R., Amrulloh, H., & Gholipour Fereidouni, H. (2026b). Global climate action toward net-zero emissions: Pathways, technologies, challenges, and future directions. European Journal of Sustainable Development Research, 10(3), Article em0407. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejosdr/18611](https://doi.org/10.29333/ejosdr/18611
Kioumarsi, H. (2026). NexusSDGs: A scientific platform connecting the Sustainable Development Goals [Editorial]. NexusSDGs. https://malque.pub/ojs/index.php/sdgs/article/view/21770/7601
Lu, J., Lemos, M. C., Koundinya, V., et al. (2022). Scaling up co-produced climate-driven decision support tools for agriculture. Nature Sustainability, 5, 254–262. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00825-0
Miner, K., Canavera, L., Gonet, J., et al. (2023). The co-production of knowledge for climate science. Nature Climate Change, 13, 307–308. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01633-4
Norström, A. V., Cvitanovic, C., Löf, M. F., West, S., Wyborn, C., Balvanera, P., Bednarek, A. T., Bennett, E. M., Biggs, R., de Bremond, A., Campbell, B. M., Canadell, J. G., Carpenter, S. R., Folke, C., Fulton, E. A., Gaffney, O., Gelcich, S., Jouffray, J.-B., Leach, M., & Österblom, H. (2020). Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research. Nature Sustainability, 3, 182–190.
Prakash, A., Dasgupta, P., & Rothman, D. (2026). Innovative approaches to climate change adaptation: bridging science and practice. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/1943815X.2026.2720159
Rosen, M. A., Kioumarsi, H., & Gholipour Fereidouni, H. (2025). Climate action and net-zero emissions. European Journal of Sustainable Development Research, 9(4), Article em0334. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejosdr/16864
van Vuuren, D. P., Stehfest, E., Gernaat, D. E. H. J., Berg, M., Bijl, D. L., de Boer, H. S., Daioglou, V., Doelman, J. C., Edelenbosch, O. Y., Harmsen, M., Hof, A. F., & van Sluisveld, M. A. E. (2018). Alternative pathways to the 1.5 °C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies. Nature Climate Change, 8, 391–397. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8
Yin, C., Zhao, W., Fu, B., et al. (2026). The dual impact of trade on the water–energy–food nexus globally. Nature Sustainability, 9, 921–932. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-026-01796-w