The research article by Fibiger et al.1 details the unique and unprecedented findings of a unique Iron Age gravesite at Gomolava located in Serbia. The grave contained mostly (but not entirely) unrelated women and children who were killed within a short duration, followed by interment soon thereafter. Notably, their corpses were not defiled and ill-treated by, for example, mutilation followed by careless dumping into a single pit. Rather, much care was taken to provide grave goods and artifacts within a clearly systematized, ritualistic context. Therefore, it is amply clear that whether or not the perpetrators were biologically related to the victims, they certainly respected them in a social sense - at least enough to give them a decent burial. This begs the question about the identity and motivation of those who selectively killed women and children.
In their discussion, the authors perceptively remark: ‘Cross-culturally, women and children are often seen as valuable (for example, enslavement, procreation, labour and loot) and may be preferentially taken as captives...’ I venture to highlight that, in addition to purely materialistic value, women and children are repositories of an intangible value too: Honor. Cross-culturally, it is well-known that an enemy’s feared or actual ill-treatment of women and children as spoils of war is inextricably linked with notions of tribal and communal honor. The chastity and faithfulness of women have been viewed as integral to, and inseparable from the concept of family and/or tribal honor within traditional societies the world over. Likewise, enslavement of children constitutes an insult to, and degradation of their natal group.
As a plausible alternative interpretation of the findings of Fibiger et al., I suggest that this group consisting of the victims and the unknown perpetrators may have been the remnant of a larger group or principality that had spontaneously coalesced while fleeing in extremis from (unknown) external foes. This would account for their general biological non-relatedness. Eventually, with certain defeat staring them in the face, the able-bodied men within the group might have killed and buried the women and children to preserve their communal honor, before either dying in a final battle or fleeing to an unknown fate. From a practical (if heartless) viewpoint, the presence of women and children within an armed group also compromises both the military effectiveness and mobility of the group. Instances of able-bodied men selectively killing women and children within an extended social group to safeguard communal honor before making a last stand or a desperate retreat are well-known throughout human history and across cultures. Therefore, the Gomolava mass grave may well be the earliest known instance of death before dishonor in the archaeological record. If this interpretation is correct, signs of coeval conflict could still be waiting to be discovered in the region.
References:
- Fibiger, L., Iraeta-Orbegozo, M., Koledin, J. et al. A large mass grave from the Early Iron Age indicates selective violence towards women and children in the Carpathian Basin. Nat Hum Behav (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-025-02399-9
Notes:
Poster image reproduced from Fibiger et. al. (2026) (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-025-02399-9) under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed herein do not represent the views of the TERI School of Advanced Studies or TERI.