Dr. Elizabeth A Silber is a Senior R&D Scientist at Sandia National Laboratories, USA, and an Adjunct Research Professor at Western University, Canada. She joined the Editorial Board of Scientific Reports in 2024 and is currently serving as a Guest Editor for the Icy Solar System Moons Collection.
Her work is driven by her fascination with the high-energy interactions between extraterrestrial bodies and Earth’s atmosphere. She specializes in planetary science and meteor physics, specifically the complex physics of meteor-generated shock waves. By integrating multi-modal data, her work seeks to decode the energy signatures of bolides and space debris, a task vital for both planetary defense and our understanding of the terrestrial influx of meteoroids. Additionally, she models impact crater formation on various planetary bodies to better understand the physical processes and history of our solar system through the lens of planetary evolution.
***
We recently invited Dr. Elizabeth A Silber for a Q&A where they answered questions about their research and what it is to work as an Editorial Board Member at Scientific Reports. Some of the questions they answered are below:
What do you like most about handling manuscripts at Scientific Reports?
I find deep professional satisfaction in the process of scientific adjudication. Overseeing the journey from submission to publication allows me to act as a steward of quality. I enjoy the intellectual challenge of evaluating a study's methodology to make certain it is not just "interesting," but fundamentally sound. It is a privilege to facilitate a peer-review process that improves the clarity of a manuscript, verifying that when a paper is published, it stands as a reliable foundation upon which other specialists can confidently build.
If you were to give a piece of advice to other Editors, what would that be?
Our greatest responsibility is to be the protectors of scientific methods. My advice is to always prioritize the "how" over the "what." The result is only as good as the methodology used to achieve it. Focus on transparency, statistical integrity, and reproducibility. If science is robust, it belongs in the record. We should view ourselves not as gatekeepers of "fame," but as facilitators of truth, making certain that every published study contributes a reliable piece to the puzzle of our understanding of the natural world.
How important is reproducibility in research? As an Editor, how do you help authors report reproducible results?
Reproducibility is the very soul of science; without it, we are simply telling stories. As an Editor, I advocate for transparency. I look for detailed Data Availability Statements and encourage the sharing of raw code and sensor calibration parameters. I treat the methods section as a manual, as it must be detailed enough for a peer to follow the exact same path. By insisting on this level of granularity, we verify that science remains a verifiable and iterative process.
What are the key things journals should do to ensure scientific rigor?
Journals must move beyond the allure of "novelty" and reinforce the value of technical excellence. This means enforcing strict adherence to reporting guidelines and actively encouraging the publication of negative results and replication studies. Rigor is maintained when we celebrate the process as much as the outcome. Additionally, implementing advanced checks for data integrity and image manipulation is essential to combat the rising challenges of the modern publishing landscape and to verify the enduring trustworthiness of our scientific archives.
What are responsible ways to integrate AI into the peer review process, and how can editors feel empowered to explore these new tools to provide helpful solutions for authors, editors, reviewers, and AI experts?
AI should be utilized as a high-precision diagnostic tool for the "administrative" health of a manuscript, such as detecting plagiarism, image inconsistencies, or statistical anomalies. This empowers editors by filtering out technical red flags, allowing us to dedicate our time to the deep, intellectual evaluation of the logic and impact of the work. By viewing AI as a specialized assistant rather than a replacement, we can increase the efficiency and integrity of the review process while keeping human expertise at the helm.
Looking to the future, how can we further promote inclusivity, diversity and rigor in scientific publishing?
Future progress depends on decoupling scientific merit from institutional or geographic status. We can promote rigor by normalizing the publication of negative results and replication studies, which strengthens the reliability of the global record. To foster diversity, editorial boards should actively seek specialists from underrepresented regions and varied career stages to serve as reviewers. This broadens the perspective of the adjudication process. By prioritizing the quality of the methodology over the "prestige" of the author, we make certain that the most valid ideas rise to the top. This approach verifies that science remains a truly global, meritocratic endeavor.
You are leading one of our Guest-Edited Collections. What interested you about becoming a Guest Editor?
What interested me most about becoming a Guest Editor was the opportunity to help curate a focused scientific conversation around some of the most compelling and rapidly evolving questions in planetary science. Guest-Edited Collections provide a valuable mechanism for bringing together diverse approaches, from spacecraft observations and laboratory experiments to numerical modeling and theoretical work, in a way that highlights both the maturity of a field and the questions that remain unresolved. I am particularly drawn to this role because it allows me to support rigorous, interdisciplinary work while helping to build a coherent resource that can serve the broader planetary science community.
What is your Collection focused on?
The Icy Solar System Moons Collection is focused on the physical processes, evolution, and astrobiological potential of icy satellites across the Solar System. These bodies preserve a remarkable record of geological activity, impact history, interior structure, surface-atmosphere interactions, and, in some cases, subsurface oceans. The Collection welcomes studies that examine their surfaces, interiors, compositions, thermal histories, impact processes, cryovolcanism, tectonics, and potential habitability. By bringing these topics together, the Collection aims to advance our understanding of icy moons not as isolated objects, but as dynamic worlds that offer critical insight into planetary evolution, volatile transport, and the conditions that may support life beyond Earth.