A mixed methods study of using Wasta in healthcare services in Palestine: predictors, consequences and proposed solutions
This unique study conducted in 2021-22 in the occupied Palestinian territories and Gaza examined the use of wasta. Examining the use of wasta in healthcare in Palestine, we employed qualitative (ten health professionals and eighteen patients from Gaza and the West Bank) and quantitative research methods, surveying more than 700 individuals. Where the official processes to reach a goal are corrupt, bureaucratic, or inefficient persons often turn to using wasta to overcome barriers.
Participants included refugees living in camps, urban, and rural dwellers from the age of 18. Approximately one-third (34%) stated they used wasta to get a health service in the last year, 39.3% from Gaza and 31.6% from the West Bank. Wasta is reportedly also used within healthcare institutions by some employees to gain unfair advantages over others. Our interviews also highlighted social and organizational-level predictors and consequences of wasta. The potential predictors include scarcity of resources (material, human, and financial), cultural factors, and inefficient administration. The consequences of wasta include inequities in healthcare, decreased healthcare professionals’ motivation and morale, and lower service quality.
This study considerably enriched the conceptual definition of wasta use in healthcare settings by elucidating the multifaceted mechanisms through which it manifests, its predictors, and its consequences. Wasta can be employed by utilizing social connections, political affiliations, family ties, and economic means. This study confirmed previous research about the role of organizational, social, and economic factors in causing wasta.
The utilization of wasta in healthcare leads to outcomes such as disparities, reduced staff motivation, and compromised service quality. Through wasta and social connections, some patients may gain unfair advantages over others. Our interviews revealed that when staff are promoted and rewarded through wasta or social connections rather than for hard work, dedication, or performance, inequities become manifest. These unfair practices cast a negative shadow on the institution and its services by eroding the morale and motivation of its personnel.
Predictors and consequences of wasta in countries where official processes to reach a goal are corrupt, bureaucratic, or inefficient, individuals resort to wasta to overcome oppressive processes [1]. Patriarchy, tribalism, religious and political strife, inequities, discrimination, and lack of trust in public institutions are contextual vices within which wasta proliferates [2, 3].
The higher prevalence of wasta in refugee camps and in Gaza is probably because these communities have faced disadvantages for generations, enduring various difficulties and injustices. It is possible that their perception, based on personal experiences or hearsay, is that utilizing wasta can help improve their situation. In the camps, residents are bound by a common history of forced displacements and are living in crowded conditions. Political activism is stronger in camps.
Wasta results in inequalities by depriving women and those with lower social networks from accessing opportunities [4, 5]. Wasta encourages people to invest more in social networks rather than other more useful forms of social capital [6]. Wasta could decrease the utilization of healthcare services via a lack of trust in the system. Additionally, wasta may lower healthcare providers’ motivation, satisfaction, and morale. Our interviews highlighted social and organizational-level predictors and consequences of wasta. The consequences of wasta include inequities in healthcare, decreased healthcare professionals’ motivation and morale, and lower service quality.
It is essential to optimize processes for efficiency, alleviate financial strains, and implement accountability measures in the healthcare domains.
- Horak S, Afiouni F, Bian Y, Ledeneva A, Muratbekova-Touron M, Fey CF. Informal networks: Dark sides, bright sides, and unexplored dimensions. Manag Organ Rev. 2020;16:511–42.
- Hutchings K, Weir D. Guanxi and Wasta: A comparison. Thunderbird Int Bus Rev. 2006;48:141–56.
- Alsarhan F, Ali S, Weir D, Valax M. Impact of gender on use of wasta among human resources management practitioners. Thunderbird Int Bus Rev. 2021;63:131–43.
- Abalkhail JM, Allan B. “Wasta” and women’s careers in the Arab Gulf States. Gend Manag Int J. 2016;31:162–80.
- Banihani M. Empowering Jordanian women through entrepreneurship. J Res Mark Entrep. 2020;22:133–44.
- Baranik L, Gorman B, Wright N. Wasta and its relationship to employment status and income in the Arab Middle East. Curr Sociol. 2021;:00113921211024705.
Follow the Topic
-
BMC Health Services Research
An open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, focusing on digital health, governance, policy, system quality and safety, delivery and access, financing and economics, implementing reform, and the workforce.
Related Collections
With collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.
Trauma-informed approaches: implications for practice, policy, and research
BMC Health Services Research is calling for submissions to our Collection on Trauma-informed approaches: Implications for practice, policy, and research.
Trauma-informed approach mark a pivotal evolution in organizational development by recognizing the pervasive impact of trauma on individuals within healthcare organizations. These initiatives involve implementing practices sensitive to the trauma experiences of both patients and healthcare staff, such as adopting patient-centered care approaches, trauma-specific interventions, and staff training on trauma sensitivity. This Collection aims to examine the crucial role of trauma-informed initiatives in fostering safety, resilience, and healing within healthcare settings, with a focus on addressing the unique needs and experiences of both patients and staff members. Additionally, it addresses how routine healthcare procedures can inadvertently retraumatize both patients and staff, underscoring the necessity for trauma-sensitive approaches to mitigate harm and promote holistic well-being for all stakeholders involved.
This Collection explores and highlights the transformative impact of trauma-informed organizational change programs. We are particularly interested in the following research areas:
Theoretical frameworks and models of trauma-informed organizational change within healthcare settings
Reports of successful implementation of trauma-informed practices in various healthcare organizations
The role of healthcare leadership in driving and sustaining trauma-informed organizational change
Strategies for integrating trauma-informed approaches into existing healthcare organizational structures and processes to enhance patient care and staff well-being
Measurement and evaluation of the effectiveness of trauma-informed organizational change programs in improving patient outcomes and staff satisfaction
Addressing diversity, equity, and inclusion within trauma-informed healthcare organizational change efforts
Challenges and barriers to implementing trauma-informed practices in different healthcare specialties or sectors
Training and professional development for healthcare staff and leaders in trauma-informed approaches to patient care
Ethical considerations and dilemmas in trauma-informed organizational change initiatives within healthcare settings
Future directions and innovations in trauma-informed organizational development research and practice within healthcare contexts.
This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being, SDG 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth , and SDG 16: Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions.
All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.
Publishing Model: Open Access
Deadline: May 21, 2025
Delivering better health services through patient-centered care
BMC Health Services Research is calling for submissions to our Collection on delivering better health services through patient-centered care.
In the rapidly evolving landscape of healthcare, the shift towards a more patient-centered approach is driven by a multifaceted understanding that extends beyond traditional models. The imperative to consider the whole person in healthcare delivery arises not only from a desire to enhance treatment outcomes and improve patient satisfaction but also from the recognition that health and well-being encompass all aspects of patients’ lives beyond the absence of illness. This paradigm shift acknowledges the potential for decreased costs and more efficient use of resources through a focus on preventive measures and coordinated care, personalized treatment plans, social care, and a collaborative partnership between healthcare providers and patients. By prioritizing patient needs and preferences, the healthcare system aims to elevate the quality of care while optimizing resource utilization, ultimately improving health and well-being outcomes and fostering increased satisfaction among both patients and healthcare providers and staff.
This Collection explores and highlights the transformative impact of patient-centered care on quality of care. We are particularly interested in the following research areas:
Reporting about patient-centered care in a variety of healthcare settings and patient populations
Exploring cutting-edge technologies and telehealth platforms that empower patients in decision-making, including medical homes, virtual consultations, remote monitoring
Investigating the impact of a holistic approach addressing patients' physical, mental, emotional, and social well-being
Patient-centered and whole person care in specialized fields, particularly complex care, long term care
The role and perspectives of healthcare professionals in patient-centered and whole person care
Assessing the performance of patient-centered and whole person care initiatives, including cost-effectiveness
Approaches to coordinating patient-centered and whole person care to ensure that patients’ preferences and priorities are shared across care teams and settings
Strategies and solutions for overcoming organizational and cultural barriers in patient-centered and whole person care
Policy implications and advocacy for patient-centered and whole person care
Large-scale system transformations to improve patient-centered and whole person care
All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.
Publishing Model: Open Access
Deadline: Mar 28, 2025
Please sign in or register for FREE
If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in