A mixed methods study of using Wasta in healthcare services in Palestine: predictors, consequences and proposed solutions

Wasta, an Arabic term loosely translated to ‘clout’ is frequently used in the Arab world, utilizing social/family connections, political affiliations, and economic means. Authors El Jabari, Carol and Takruri, Adel
Published in Business & Management
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Read the paper

BioMed Central
BioMed Central BioMed Central

A mixed methods study of using wasta in healthcare services in Palestine: predictors, consequences and proposed solutions - BMC Health Services Research

Background Equity in access to quality healthcare is a fundamental human right. Yet studies demonstrate that some people receive preferential treatment while others are discriminated against. Wasta is a prevalent strategy whereby personal connections are used for influence and may result in gaining unfair advantages over others. This study aims to investigate wasta use in healthcare, the factors associated with its use, and the impact of wasta use on the equity and quality of healthcare services. Methods A mixed-methods study utilizing a quantitative survey and qualitative interviews was conducted in Palestine (West Bank and Gaza) between October 2021 and February 2022. Quantitative analysis was performed using Stata version 14. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regressions assessed the relationship between wasta use and individual-level variables such as gender, residence, age, employment status, and financial situation. Content analyses of qualitative transcripts were performed using Dedoose version 9. Textual quotes were grouped into major and minor themes. Results Multivariate regressions revealed that wasta use is more prevalent among refugee camp dwellers and more frequent in Gaza compared to the West Bank. Wasta was also employed to a greater degree among government employees. Qualitative interviews complemented the quantitative results and added further insights into the consequences of Wasta use in healthcare settings such as negatively impacting quality and equity in healthcare services. Conclusion Wasta use in healthcare can have an adverse effect on equity and quality. Ensuring efficient processes, reduced financial burdens, stringent accountability measures, transparency, and training programs can contribute to diminishing the need for using wasta in healthcare. By addressing both systemic and cultural factors that perpetuate wasta, societies can move closer to healthcare systems characterized by fairness, accessibility, and ethical integrity.

This unique study conducted in 2021-22 in the occupied Palestinian territories and Gaza examined the use of wasta. Examining the use of wasta in healthcare in Palestine, we employed qualitative (ten health professionals and eighteen patients from Gaza and the West Bank) and quantitative research methods, surveying more than 700 individuals. Where the official processes to reach a goal are corrupt, bureaucratic, or inefficient persons often turn to using wasta to overcome barriers. 

Participants included refugees living in camps, urban, and rural dwellers from the age of 18.  Approximately one-third (34%) stated they used wasta to get a health service in the last year, 39.3% from Gaza and 31.6% from the West Bank. Wasta is reportedly also used within healthcare institutions by some employees to gain unfair advantages over others. Our interviews also highlighted social and organizational-level predictors and consequences of wasta. The potential predictors include scarcity of resources (material, human, and financial), cultural factors, and inefficient administration. The consequences of wasta include inequities in healthcare, decreased healthcare professionals’ motivation and morale, and lower service quality.

This study considerably enriched the conceptual definition of wasta use in healthcare settings by elucidating the multifaceted mechanisms through which it manifests, its predictors, and its consequences. Wasta can be employed by utilizing social connections, political affiliations, family ties, and economic means. This study confirmed previous research about the role of organizational, social, and economic factors in causing wasta.

The utilization of wasta in healthcare leads to outcomes such as disparities, reduced staff motivation, and compromised service quality. Through wasta and social connections, some patients may gain unfair advantages over others. Our interviews revealed that when staff are promoted and rewarded through wasta or social connections rather than for hard work, dedication, or performance, inequities become manifest. These unfair practices cast a negative shadow on the institution and its services by eroding the morale and motivation of its personnel.

Predictors and consequences of wasta in countries where official processes to reach a goal are corrupt, bureaucratic, or inefficient, individuals resort to wasta to overcome oppressive processes [1]. Patriarchy, tribalism, religious and political strife, inequities, discrimination, and lack of trust in public institutions are contextual vices within which wasta proliferates [2, 3].

The higher prevalence of wasta in refugee camps and in Gaza is probably because these communities have faced disadvantages for generations, enduring various difficulties and injustices. It is possible that their perception, based on personal experiences or hearsay, is that utilizing wasta can help improve their situation. In the camps, residents are bound by a common history of forced displacements and are living in crowded conditions. Political activism is stronger in camps.

Wasta results in inequalities by depriving women and those with lower social networks from accessing opportunities [4, 5]. Wasta encourages people to invest more in social networks rather than other more useful forms of social capital [6]. Wasta could decrease the utilization of healthcare services via a lack of trust in the system. Additionally, wasta may lower healthcare providers’ motivation, satisfaction, and morale. Our interviews highlighted social and organizational-level predictors and consequences of wasta.   The consequences of wasta include inequities in healthcare, decreased healthcare professionals’ motivation and morale, and lower service quality.   

It is essential to optimize processes for efficiency, alleviate financial strains, and implement accountability measures in the healthcare domains.

  1. Horak S, Afiouni F, Bian Y, Ledeneva A, Muratbekova-Touron M, Fey CF. Informal networks: Dark sides, bright sides, and unexplored dimensions. Manag Organ Rev. 2020;16:511–42.
  2. Hutchings K, Weir D. Guanxi and Wasta: A comparison. Thunderbird Int Bus Rev. 2006;48:141–56.
  3. Alsarhan F, Ali S, Weir D, Valax M. Impact of gender on use of wasta among human resources management practitioners. Thunderbird Int Bus Rev. 2021;63:131–43.
  4. Abalkhail JM, Allan B. “Wasta” and women’s careers in the Arab Gulf States. Gend Manag Int J. 2016;31:162–80.
  5. Banihani M. Empowering Jordanian women through entrepreneurship. J Res Mark Entrep. 2020;22:133–44.
  6. Baranik L, Gorman B, Wright N. Wasta and its relationship to employment status and income in the Arab Middle East. Curr Sociol. 2021;:00113921211024705.

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Health Care Management
Humanities and Social Sciences > Business and Management > Industries > Health Care Management

Related Collections

With collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Trauma-informed approaches: implications for practice, policy, and research

BMC Health Services Research is calling for submissions to our Collection on Trauma-informed approaches: Implications for practice, policy, and research.

Trauma-informed approach mark a pivotal evolution in organizational development by recognizing the pervasive impact of trauma on individuals within healthcare organizations. These initiatives involve implementing practices sensitive to the trauma experiences of both patients and healthcare staff, such as adopting patient-centered care approaches, trauma-specific interventions, and staff training on trauma sensitivity. This Collection aims to examine the crucial role of trauma-informed initiatives in fostering safety, resilience, and healing within healthcare settings, with a focus on addressing the unique needs and experiences of both patients and staff members. Additionally, it addresses how routine healthcare procedures can inadvertently retraumatize both patients and staff, underscoring the necessity for trauma-sensitive approaches to mitigate harm and promote holistic well-being for all stakeholders involved.

This Collection explores and highlights the transformative impact of trauma-informed organizational change programs. We are particularly interested in the following research areas:

Theoretical frameworks and models of trauma-informed organizational change within healthcare settings

Reports of successful implementation of trauma-informed practices in various healthcare organizations

The role of healthcare leadership in driving and sustaining trauma-informed organizational change

Strategies for integrating trauma-informed approaches into existing healthcare organizational structures and processes to enhance patient care and staff well-being

Measurement and evaluation of the effectiveness of trauma-informed organizational change programs in improving patient outcomes and staff satisfaction

Addressing diversity, equity, and inclusion within trauma-informed healthcare organizational change efforts

Challenges and barriers to implementing trauma-informed practices in different healthcare specialties or sectors

Training and professional development for healthcare staff and leaders in trauma-informed approaches to patient care

Ethical considerations and dilemmas in trauma-informed organizational change initiatives within healthcare settings

Future directions and innovations in trauma-informed organizational development research and practice within healthcare contexts.

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being, SDG 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth , and SDG 16: Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions.

All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: May 21, 2025

Delivering better health services through patient-centered care

BMC Health Services Research is calling for submissions to our Collection on delivering better health services through patient-centered care.

In the rapidly evolving landscape of healthcare, the shift towards a more patient-centered approach is driven by a multifaceted understanding that extends beyond traditional models. The imperative to consider the whole person in healthcare delivery arises not only from a desire to enhance treatment outcomes and improve patient satisfaction but also from the recognition that health and well-being encompass all aspects of patients’ lives beyond the absence of illness. This paradigm shift acknowledges the potential for decreased costs and more efficient use of resources through a focus on preventive measures and coordinated care, personalized treatment plans, social care, and a collaborative partnership between healthcare providers and patients. By prioritizing patient needs and preferences, the healthcare system aims to elevate the quality of care while optimizing resource utilization, ultimately improving health and well-being outcomes and fostering increased satisfaction among both patients and healthcare providers and staff.

This Collection explores and highlights the transformative impact of patient-centered care on quality of care. We are particularly interested in the following research areas:

Reporting about patient-centered care in a variety of healthcare settings and patient populations

Exploring cutting-edge technologies and telehealth platforms that empower patients in decision-making, including medical homes, virtual consultations, remote monitoring

Investigating the impact of a holistic approach addressing patients' physical, mental, emotional, and social well-being

Patient-centered and whole person care in specialized fields, particularly complex care, long term care

The role and perspectives of healthcare professionals in patient-centered and whole person care

Assessing the performance of patient-centered and whole person care initiatives, including cost-effectiveness

Approaches to coordinating patient-centered and whole person care to ensure that patients’ preferences and priorities are shared across care teams and settings

Strategies and solutions for overcoming organizational and cultural barriers in patient-centered and whole person care

Policy implications and advocacy for patient-centered and whole person care

Large-scale system transformations to improve patient-centered and whole person care

All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Mar 28, 2025