Following my last post, “Let’s drink up this glass of species wine!” (https://natureecoevocommunity.nature.com/posts/64847-let-s-drink-up-this-glass-of-species-wine), we successfully published that opinion/perspective article in a decent journal BMC Plant Biology: https://bmcplantbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12870-020-02646-3
These days, more and more people are concerned about the increased plant diversity somewhere in the world. Meanwhile, we are on the age of the “sixth mass extinction”, both have lots of evidence. However, I found all the questions could not be addressed in one paper, thus I want to contribute one Review article on this topic: plant speciation vs. extinction in the Anthropocene.
In this Review article, we clarified the mechanisms of speciation and extinction, where the plant speciation occurs and why we will lose more plant species in this and the following centuries. In which areas on the Earth are easier to form new plant species? What are the current ways of plant extinction? In the context of climate change, is plant speciation more dominant than plant extinction? (Fig. 1) At last, we gave four insightful research directions. These are fundamental questions in plant science and sustainability research, which need a critical and thorough review. We believe, the timely publication of such a review article would be a great thing for the plants’ conservation.
Remarkably, we have cited 150 papers in this review which have a very large research dimension, including evolution, ecology, plant biology, climate change and paleobotany and etc. I am so happy to read these exciting research articles, reviews and perspectives that laid a solid foundation (truth, evidence and opinions etc.) for our review article. Just like “stand on the shoulders of giants”, probably, the most thanked people are the authors of those cited literatures in the text.
Reference
Gao, J.G., Liu, H., Wang, N., Yang, J. & Zhang, X.-L. (2020) Plant extinction excels plant speciation in the Anthropocene. BMC Plant Biology 20: 430. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-020-02646-3