"I'd Rather Just Push Through It": Why So Many Young Women Avoid Period Pain Medication

Dysmenorrhea is a prevalent condition among women of reproductive age, yet many experience medication hesitancy. This study assessed the prevalence, perception, reasons, alternative treatment practices, and predictors in dysmenorrhea management among Nigerian female undergraduates.
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Explore the Research

BioMed Central
BioMed Central BioMed Central

Medication hesitancy in dysmenorrhea: prevalence, reasons, alternative treatment use, and predictors among female undergraduates in Nigeria- a cross-sectional study - Discover Public Health

Background Dysmenorrhea is a common condition among women of reproductive age, yet some remain hesitant to use medications for pain relief. This study assessed the prevalence, perception toward medical treatment, reasons for medication hesitancy, alternative treatment practices, and predictors of medication hesitancy in dysmenorrhea management among Nigerian female undergraduates. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted among 273 female undergraduate students at the University of Abuja, selected using multistage sampling. Data were collected with a semi-structured questionnaire administered physically and online. Perception of medical treatment was measured using a 12–60-point scale, with scores ≥ 30 indicating positive perception and scores < 30 indicating negative perception. Descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression were used for analysis. Results Of 273 participants, 239 (87.5%) experienced menstrual pain, and 105 (38.5%) reported hesitancy to use medications. Major reasons included fear of side effects (81.9%), addiction (66.7%), and infertility (51.4%). Most students (73.6%) had a positive perception of medical treatment, while 25.2% and 15.2% used heat therapy and exercise, respectively, as alternatives. Ethnicity significantly predicted hesitancy: Hausa (OR = 2.63; 95% CI: 1.21–5.72; p = 0.015) and Igbo (OR = 3.10; 95% CI: 1.38–6.95; p = 0.006) students had higher odds compared with Yoruba students. Other factors, including age, religion, and perception score, were not significantly associated with hesitancy. Conclusion Medication hesitancy in dysmenorrhea management is common and largely influenced by cultural beliefs and fear of side effects rather than perception alone. Culturally tailored menstrual health education and university-based awareness programs are essential to improve trust in pharmacological options and promote evidence-based self-care.

A pain almost every young woman knows

If you've ever doubled over with period cramps, missed a class, or quietly powered through a workday while gripping a hot water bottle under your desk, you already know what dysmenorrhea feels like  even if you've never heard the clinical name for it.

It's one of the most common health complaints among young women anywhere in the world, with global prevalence estimates ranging from 45% up to 95% depending on the population studied. In Nigeria, studies among young women put the number at roughly 68–72%. And yet, despite how common it is, dysmenorrhea is still frequently brushed aside  by patients, and sometimes by the health systems meant to help them, as just something you're supposed to endure.

What surprised us most in this study wasn't that so many young women experience painful periods. It's that so many of them, even when medication was available and known to help, chose not to take it.

The question we wanted answered

Medical guidelines are fairly clear: over-the-counter anti-inflammatory painkillers (NSAIDs) are the first-line, evidence-based treatment for period pain, and they work by directly reducing the uterine contractions that cause the cramping in the first place.

But clinical guidelines only matter if people actually feel comfortable following them. We wanted to know: how many young women experiencing period pain are hesitant to take medication for it? What's driving that hesitation? And are some groups of students more affected than others?

To find out, we surveyed 273 female undergraduate students at the University of Abuja, one of Nigeria's largest public universities, asking about their menstrual health, their medication habits, their beliefs about treatment, and the alternative methods they turn to instead.

What we found

Almost 4 in 10 students said no to medication. Of the students who experienced menstrual pain, 38.5% reported that they simply don't use medication to manage it despite it being both available and effective.

The reasons weren't really about the pain itself — they were about fear. When we asked why, the top answers weren't about cost or access. They were about trust:

  • 81.9% feared side effects
  • 66.7% worried the medication could lead to addiction
  • 51.4% feared it might affect their future fertility
  • 43.8% cited religious or cultural beliefs

None of these fears are supported by clinical evidence. Standard doses of NSAIDs for period pain don't cause addiction, and there's no established link between short-term NSAID use for dysmenorrhea and infertility. But the fears were real, common, and clearly shaping behavior.

Most turned to something else instead. More than half of students (55.3%) said they use alternative approaches to manage their pain, where heat therapy (25.2%) and simple relaxation techniques (16.6%) were the most popular, followed by exercise (15.2%) and supplements (13.9%). These aren't bad choices on their own. Heat therapy in particular has decent evidence behind it for mild pain, but it's often not enough on its own for moderate-to-severe cramping, and many students seemed to be leaning on it as a full replacement for medical treatment rather than a complement to it.

Trusting medicine and avoiding medicine weren't opposites. Here's the part that really stood out to us: 73.6% of students actually had a positive view of medical treatment for dysmenorrhea overall. But that positive attitude had no statistically significant relationship with whether they actually took medication when they were in pain. In plain terms, believing medicine works and actually using it turned out to be two very different things. Fear and cultural belief were doing more of the driving than logic or trust.

Some students believed they should "wait it out." A meaningful number of respondents felt medication should only be used once pain became severe, a belief that, in practice, likely means many students are suffering longer than they need to before reaching for something that could help.

Cultural background mattered. This was one of our clearest findings. Compared with Yoruba students, Hausa students were over 2.5 times more likely to report medication hesitancy, and Igbo students were roughly 3 times more likely. Age, religion, and even a student's own positive perception of medicine didn't significantly predict hesitancy but ethnicity did. This tells us something important: this isn't simply a knowledge gap that a single generic pamphlet can fix. It's shaped by specific cultural narratives and beliefs that differ meaningfully across communities.

Why this actually matters

Untreated period pain isn't just a personal inconvenience. It's linked to missed classes, reduced concentration, and lower academic performance—real costs stacking up quietly, semester after semester, often in silence, because menstruation is still a topic many young women hesitate to talk about openly.

If a large proportion of students are avoiding a safe, effective, and accessible treatment purely out of misplaced fear, that's a solvable problem, but only if the solution speaks directly to the actual fears people hold in a way that fits their specific cultural context.

What needs to happen next

Based on what we found, a single, one-size-fits-all "period pain awareness" poster campaign probably won't move the needle much. What's more likely to help:

  • Culturally tailored health messaging — speaking directly and respectfully to specific fears (like fertility concerns) within the communities where those fears are strongest, rather than assuming every student needs the same message.
  • University health services stepping in—offering real menstrual health counseling as a normal part of campus healthcare, not an awkward afterthought.
  • Peer-led education — students often trust other students, especially when messaging comes through familiar cultural and community channels rather than generic institutional messaging.

Period pain is common. Effective treatment for it exists. The gap between those two facts is filled almost entirely by fear, belief, and silence, and that gap is exactly where good, culturally aware health education can make a real difference.

Read the full open-access paper here: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12982-025-01231-z

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Reproductive Medicine
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Clinical Medicine > Reproductive Medicine
Public Health
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Public Health

Related Collections

With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Promoting Healthy Diets and Food Security across Global Public Health Systems

The interconnection between healthy diets and food security is a critical concern for global public health systems, particularly in the context of escalating population growth, climate change, and socioeconomic disparities. Proper nutrition is essential for overall health and well-being; however, millions worldwide face malnutrition in its various forms, including undernutrition, micronutrient deficiencies, and obesity. Food security encompasses not only the availability of food but also its accessibility, utilization, and stability. Addressing these complex challenges is vital for achieving sustainable development goals and improving health outcomes across diverse populations.

This Collection is motivated by the urgent need to strengthen the integration of health policy with healthy diet promotion and food security within public health frameworks. As nations work to build resilient health systems, innovative strategies that promote healthy eating and ensure food security are essential. This Collection aims to gather interdisciplinary insights and research that address these pressing issues, fostering collaboration among public health experts, nutritionists, policymakers, and community stakeholders.

The purpose of this Collection is to provide a platform for sharing research findings and practical solutions that enhance healthy diets and food security through effective health policies. We welcome contributions that explore policy interventions, community-based initiatives, and innovative programs focused on promoting nutrition education and improving food access. By highlighting diverse perspectives and successful models, this Collection seeks to inform future public health strategies and contribute to the development of effective, equitable food systems worldwide.

Topics of interest include, but are not limited to:

- Evidence-based community interventions to enhance food security

- The influence of health policy on food systems and public health outcomes

- Global case studies demonstrating effective food access and health promotion

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 2 and SDG 3.

Keywords: healthy diets; food security; nutrition promotion; malnutrition; public health; health policy; food access and availability

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Dec 05, 2026

The Economics of Longevity: Health Expenditure and Societal Implications for Public Health Systems

The relationship between health investment and life expectancy has long been a focal point in public health research and policy. As nations grapple with rising healthcare costs and varying health outcomes, understanding how financial allocations influence population health becomes increasingly critical. Numerous studies have illustrated that increased spending on health services often correlates with improvements in life expectancy; however, the complexities of this relationship are not fully understood. Factors such as socioeconomic status, healthcare accessibility, and the efficiency of health systems play significant roles in determining how investments translate into health outcomes.

At the national level, health investments primarily encompass government expenditure on healthcare systems, public health initiatives, and health infrastructure. Nations that allocate substantial resources toward healthcare often experience better health outcomes and increased life expectancy among their populations. For instance, countries with robust healthcare funding tend to provide more comprehensive services, including preventive care, chronic disease management, and health promotion programs, all of which contribute to enhanced population health. However, it is crucial to consider how these investments are distributed across different segments of the population. Inequities in health spending can exacerbate existing disparities, leading to significant differences in life expectancy among various demographic groups. Effective health investment strategies must address these disparities to ensure that improvements in life expectancy are equitable and inclusive.

The motivation for this Collection arises from the urgent need to bridge the gap between health expenditures and tangible improvements in life expectancy. Recent global health crises and ongoing disparities in health outcomes across different populations have underscored the necessity for a deeper exploration of how resource allocation affects health dynamics. This Collection seeks to provide a platform for researchers and practitioners to discuss empirical evidence, theoretical frameworks, and innovative approaches to understanding these critical interactions. By fostering dialogue around effective health investment strategies, we aim to contribute to the development of more equitable and efficient health systems worldwide.

The purpose of this Collection is to gather comprehensive research that elucidates the dynamics between health investment and life expectancy across diverse contexts. We welcome contributions that analyze historical trends, comparative studies, and policy evaluations, as well as those that explore the implications of financial investments on health equity. By highlighting interdisciplinary perspectives and fostering collaboration, this Collection aspires to advance the discourse on optimizing health investments for improved population health outcomes.

Topics of interest include, but are not limited to:

- Economic evaluations of health interventions

- Policy impacts on health spending and life expectancy

- Health equity and investment disparities

- Longitudinal studies on health expenditures and population health

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3.

Keywords: health expenditure; healthcare economics; life expectancy; economic evaluation; population health; health investment; health policy

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Sep 04, 2026