Invisible Hazards: Why We Must Bridge the Safety Culture Gap Between Social and Technical Vocational Students

As an occupational safety expert and educator, I've noticed a striking gap in safety culture between technical and social vocational students. Here is why the "invisible" risks in social programs demand a paradigm shift in how we teach Occupational Health and Safety.

Published in Healthcare & Nursing

Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Explore the Research

BioMed Central
BioMed Central BioMed Central

Risk perception and compliance shape safety culture differences between technical and social vocational students - Discover Public Health

Objective As Industry 4.0 reshapes the labor market, the concept of occupational risk has evolved from purely physical hazards to complex psychosocial and ergonomic challenges. This study aims to evaluate the safety culture perception levels of vocational school students and to investigate the “interdisciplinary gap” between Technical and Social programs regarding the tangibility of risk. Method Employing a retrospective cross-sectional survey design, data were collected from a stratified random sample of 420 students (210 Technical, 210 Social) enrolled at Istanbul Beykent University Vocational School during the Fall Semester of the 2025–2026 Academic Year. The “Occupational Health and Safety Competence Perception Scale” developed by Kocaay (Yükseköğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi, 2020) was utilized to measure students’ risk perception, safety compliance, and safety communication. Results The analysis revealed a significant interdisciplinary dissociation. Technical students scored significantly higher in “Risk Perception” (X̄ = 4.28) and “Safety Compliance” (X̄ = 4.30). Conversely, Social students exhibited a distinct “Knowledge-Attitude Gap,” demonstrating moderate theoretical communication but alarmingly low behavioral compliance (X̄ = 2.90). Furthermore, female students demonstrated significantly higher safety rule compliance than male students (p < .05). Conclusion The findings suggest that the tangible nature of technical risks may facilitate better internalization, whereas social students often perceive office-based risks as “invisible” or distant. To bridge this gap, a paradigm shift from a uniform curriculum to a sector-specific, simulation-based OHS education integrating “Risk Science” principles is strongly recommended.

As an A-Class occupational safety expert and educator trainer, I have spent years analyzing workplace risks and training occupational physicians and safety specialists. In construction sites, factories, or heavy industry, danger is always visible; a spinning gear, high-voltage lines, or massive cranes constantly trigger your survival instincts. However, when I transitioned into my academic career as an Assistant Professor at a foundation university and stepped into the lecture halls, I encountered an entirely different and much more insidious type of risk: "invisibility."

While training the future workforce, I began to notice a striking dichotomy among students. Technical program students, who work with tangible risks in laboratories or workshops, rapidly internalized a safety culture. But what about the social program students—the future managers, designers, or logistics experts? For them, occupational health and safety (OHS) often felt like an abstract regulatory requirement or a mere theoretical hurdle irrelevant to their future careers. This observation sparked the research recently published in Discover Public Health.

In our study, we utilized a retrospective cross-sectional survey design to compare the safety culture perceptions of 420 students (210 Technical, 210 Social) studying within the same vocational school ecosystem. Our primary goal was to empirically quantify whether the "tangibility" of risk created an interdisciplinary gap.

The results numerically validated my field observations. Technical students scored significantly higher in both risk perception (Mean=4.28) and safety compliance (Mean=4.30). However, the most striking disparity was found among the social program students. While these students exhibited moderate scores in theoretical safety communication, their scores dropped alarmingly when it came to actual behavioral compliance (Mean=2.90).

We define this as the "Knowledge-Attitude Gap". The students know the rules, but they do not translate that knowledge into attitude because the risks seem distant or invisible in their anticipated office environments. Interestingly, our study also observed that female students demonstrated significantly higher compliance with safety protocols than male students, highlighting their strong potential in safety leadership roles.

As Industry 4.0 reshapes the labor market, the nature of occupational risks is fundamentally shifting. Physical hazards are increasingly being accompanied by invisible risks such as ergonomic disorders, digital burnout, and psychosocial stress. Just because a social program student does not perceive an immediate physical threat does not mean they are not at risk; the nature of the risk is simply different.

This study is a call for a serious paradigm shift in how we teach safety culture in higher education. A universal, "one-size-fits-all" OHS curriculum is fundamentally flawed for a diverse vocational education landscape. We must make invisible risks "visible" for social sciences students. The solution lies in elevating OHS education from a mere set of prohibitions to a "Risk Science," making it intellectually stimulating for all majors. Since we cannot create physical danger in a classroom, we must leverage Virtual Reality (VR) technologies and simulation-based educational strategies. By simulating the long-term spinal damage caused by poor posture or navigating an office fire scenario, we can provide social students with the "tangible" experience necessary to trigger a behavioral change.

Safety culture is not just about wearing personal protective equipment; it is a reflection of the respect you have for yourself and your community in modern working life. I hope this research serves as a solid step toward a sector-specific, modular safety education model for educators and policymakers alike.

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Occupational Health
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Health Care > Occupational Health

Related Collections

With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Antimicrobial Resistance: The New Challenge to Global Health in a Post-Pandemic World

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a seriously ongoing threat to global health, occurring when bacteria, fungi, viruses, and parasites evolve to resist the drugs designed to kill or block them. The COVID-19 pandemic has both directly and indirectly exacerbated the problem of AMR, as the overuse of antibiotics has accelerated the development of resistance in many pathogens. COVID-19 may have subsided, but AMR continues to pose a significant risk to the effectiveness of global healthcare systems, threatening to reverse decades of progress in combating infectious diseases. The interplay between population health and AMR has become increasingly critical as healthcare practices have shifted in response to the pandemic. Understanding this relationship is essential for developing effective strategies to mitigate the impact of AMR on population health in a post-COVID context.

The motivation for launching this Collection arises from the urgent need to address the rising tide of AMR as healthcare systems grapple with the long-term effects of the pandemic. Increased antibiotic use during COVID-19 treatment, changes in healthcare access, and disruptions in public health interventions have all contributed to an environment where AMR can thrive. Moreover, the pandemic has highlighted the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to tackling AMR, involving epidemiology, policymaking, and community health initiatives. This Collection aims to provide a platform for researchers and practitioners to share insights and findings that can inform future strategies to combat AMR while considering the broader implications for population health.

This Collection aims to highlight the multifaceted nature of AMR in a post-pandemic environment. We solicit articles that investigate the particular issues provided by the pandemic in terms of AMR development and containment, examine the impact of AMR on many sectors of healthcare, and propose novel strategies to minimize resistance propagation. Submissions may include original research, policy assessments, program evaluations, and comments on the following major areas:

• Epidemiology and trends of AMR post-pandemic

• Impact of COVID-19 on antibiotic usage

• Surveillance strategies for AMR

• AMR and stewardship

• Prevention and control measures to limit AMR spread

• Policies and programs to promote antibiotic stewardship

• Economic and social implications of AMR

• Global collaboration and initiatives to tackle AMR

By addressing these critical issues, this Collection aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the emerging challenges in antimicrobial resistance in a post-pandemic world and to promote effective strategies to preserve the power of our current antimicrobials.

Keywords: antimicrobial resistance; COVID-19; antibiotics; global health; infectious diseases; public health; policy; prevention

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Jun 30, 2026

Digital Frontiers in Public Health: Data-driven Solutions and Technologies for Efficiency, Effectiveness, and Equity

In recent years, the landscape of public health has been transformed by unprecedented access to high-quality data, advances in data storage and processing, and a growing willingness to share information across jurisdictions. The global response to the COVID-19 pandemic exemplified how coordinated data use and technological innovation can accelerate decision-making, enhance surveillance, and save lives. These developments mark a new era in which the application of modern data analytics in evidence-driven public health practices is not only possible but essential.

Building on this momentum, contemporary innovations are contributing to significant improvements in the three Es of public health: efficiency, effectiveness, and equity. Improved efficiency enables resources to be allocated and managed in a manner that generates the maximum attainable outputs; enhanced effectiveness ensures that public health policies, interventions, and practices achieve the expected health outcomes; and strengthened equity promotes fair access to healthcare and public health services across all populations. Together, these dimensions reflect the evolving priorities and capabilities of modern public health systems.

This Collection, “Digital Frontiers in Public Health: Data-driven Solutions and Technologies for Efficiency, Effectiveness, and Equity,” invites contributions that explore these themes through empirical studies, methodological advancements, case studies, and policy analyses. We seek manuscripts that highlight innovative data applications, cross-sector collaborations, digital health initiatives, and strategies that enhance equity through technology and data integration, as well as collaborative public health practices.

Topics of interest include, but are not limited to:

- Applications of novel data linkage and analytics methods in public health

- The role of participation and co-creation in addressing public health issues

- Digital and technological innovations in public health

- Complete or partial assessments of triple Es in public health

- Economic evaluations of public health interventions

By showcasing diverse approaches from around the world, this Collection aims to provide a comprehensive overview of how data-driven innovations are reshaping public health practice today, and in the future. Researchers, practitioners, and policymakers are encouraged to share their insights and experiences to contribute to this critical dialogue on the future of public health.

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3.

Keywords: digital applications; data sharing; data infrastructure; economic evaluations; health equity; public health; policy analysis; health informatics

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Sep 30, 2026