Invisible Hazards: Why We Must Bridge the Safety Culture Gap Between Social and Technical Vocational Students

As an occupational safety expert and educator, I've noticed a striking gap in safety culture between technical and social vocational students. Here is why the "invisible" risks in social programs demand a paradigm shift in how we teach Occupational Health and Safety.

Published in Healthcare & Nursing

Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Explore the Research

BioMed Central
BioMed Central BioMed Central

Risk perception and compliance shape safety culture differences between technical and social vocational students - Discover Public Health

Objective As Industry 4.0 reshapes the labor market, the concept of occupational risk has evolved from purely physical hazards to complex psychosocial and ergonomic challenges. This study aims to evaluate the safety culture perception levels of vocational school students and to investigate the “interdisciplinary gap” between Technical and Social programs regarding the tangibility of risk. Method Employing a retrospective cross-sectional survey design, data were collected from a stratified random sample of 420 students (210 Technical, 210 Social) enrolled at Istanbul Beykent University Vocational School during the Fall Semester of the 2025–2026 Academic Year. The “Occupational Health and Safety Competence Perception Scale” developed by Kocaay (Yükseköğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi, 2020) was utilized to measure students’ risk perception, safety compliance, and safety communication. Results The analysis revealed a significant interdisciplinary dissociation. Technical students scored significantly higher in “Risk Perception” (X̄ = 4.28) and “Safety Compliance” (X̄ = 4.30). Conversely, Social students exhibited a distinct “Knowledge-Attitude Gap,” demonstrating moderate theoretical communication but alarmingly low behavioral compliance (X̄ = 2.90). Furthermore, female students demonstrated significantly higher safety rule compliance than male students (p < .05). Conclusion The findings suggest that the tangible nature of technical risks may facilitate better internalization, whereas social students often perceive office-based risks as “invisible” or distant. To bridge this gap, a paradigm shift from a uniform curriculum to a sector-specific, simulation-based OHS education integrating “Risk Science” principles is strongly recommended.

As an A-Class occupational safety expert and educator trainer, I have spent years analyzing workplace risks and training occupational physicians and safety specialists. In construction sites, factories, or heavy industry, danger is always visible; a spinning gear, high-voltage lines, or massive cranes constantly trigger your survival instincts. However, when I transitioned into my academic career as an Assistant Professor at a foundation university and stepped into the lecture halls, I encountered an entirely different and much more insidious type of risk: "invisibility."

While training the future workforce, I began to notice a striking dichotomy among students. Technical program students, who work with tangible risks in laboratories or workshops, rapidly internalized a safety culture. But what about the social program students—the future managers, designers, or logistics experts? For them, occupational health and safety (OHS) often felt like an abstract regulatory requirement or a mere theoretical hurdle irrelevant to their future careers. This observation sparked the research recently published in Discover Public Health.

In our study, we utilized a retrospective cross-sectional survey design to compare the safety culture perceptions of 420 students (210 Technical, 210 Social) studying within the same vocational school ecosystem. Our primary goal was to empirically quantify whether the "tangibility" of risk created an interdisciplinary gap.

The results numerically validated my field observations. Technical students scored significantly higher in both risk perception (Mean=4.28) and safety compliance (Mean=4.30). However, the most striking disparity was found among the social program students. While these students exhibited moderate scores in theoretical safety communication, their scores dropped alarmingly when it came to actual behavioral compliance (Mean=2.90).

We define this as the "Knowledge-Attitude Gap". The students know the rules, but they do not translate that knowledge into attitude because the risks seem distant or invisible in their anticipated office environments. Interestingly, our study also observed that female students demonstrated significantly higher compliance with safety protocols than male students, highlighting their strong potential in safety leadership roles.

As Industry 4.0 reshapes the labor market, the nature of occupational risks is fundamentally shifting. Physical hazards are increasingly being accompanied by invisible risks such as ergonomic disorders, digital burnout, and psychosocial stress. Just because a social program student does not perceive an immediate physical threat does not mean they are not at risk; the nature of the risk is simply different.

This study is a call for a serious paradigm shift in how we teach safety culture in higher education. A universal, "one-size-fits-all" OHS curriculum is fundamentally flawed for a diverse vocational education landscape. We must make invisible risks "visible" for social sciences students. The solution lies in elevating OHS education from a mere set of prohibitions to a "Risk Science," making it intellectually stimulating for all majors. Since we cannot create physical danger in a classroom, we must leverage Virtual Reality (VR) technologies and simulation-based educational strategies. By simulating the long-term spinal damage caused by poor posture or navigating an office fire scenario, we can provide social students with the "tangible" experience necessary to trigger a behavioral change.

Safety culture is not just about wearing personal protective equipment; it is a reflection of the respect you have for yourself and your community in modern working life. I hope this research serves as a solid step toward a sector-specific, modular safety education model for educators and policymakers alike.

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Occupational Health
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Health Care > Occupational Health

Related Collections

With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Digital Frontiers in Public Health: Data-driven Solutions and Technologies for Efficiency, Effectiveness, and Equity

In recent years, the landscape of public health has been transformed by unprecedented access to high-quality data, advances in data storage and processing, and a growing willingness to share information across jurisdictions. The global response to the COVID-19 pandemic exemplified how coordinated data use and technological innovation can accelerate decision-making, enhance surveillance, and save lives. These developments mark a new era in which the application of modern data analytics in evidence-driven public health practices is not only possible but essential.

Building on this momentum, contemporary innovations are contributing to significant improvements in the three Es of public health: efficiency, effectiveness, and equity. Improved efficiency enables resources to be allocated and managed in a manner that generates the maximum attainable outputs; enhanced effectiveness ensures that public health policies, interventions, and practices achieve the expected health outcomes; and strengthened equity promotes fair access to healthcare and public health services across all populations. Together, these dimensions reflect the evolving priorities and capabilities of modern public health systems.

This Collection, “Digital Frontiers in Public Health: Data-driven Solutions and Technologies for Efficiency, Effectiveness, and Equity,” invites contributions that explore these themes through empirical studies, methodological advancements, case studies, and policy analyses. We seek manuscripts that highlight innovative data applications, cross-sector collaborations, digital health initiatives, and strategies that enhance equity through technology and data integration, as well as collaborative public health practices.

Topics of interest include, but are not limited to:

- Applications of novel data linkage and analytics methods in public health

- The role of participation and co-creation in addressing public health issues

- Digital and technological innovations in public health

- Complete or partial assessments of triple Es in public health

- Economic evaluations of public health interventions

By showcasing diverse approaches from around the world, this Collection aims to provide a comprehensive overview of how data-driven innovations are reshaping public health practice today, and in the future. Researchers, practitioners, and policymakers are encouraged to share their insights and experiences to contribute to this critical dialogue on the future of public health.

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3.

Keywords: digital applications; data sharing; data infrastructure; economic evaluations; health equity; public health; policy analysis; health informatics

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Sep 30, 2026

Pediatric Noncommunicable Diseases: Policy, Practice, and Public Health

Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) such as diabetes, asthma, congenital heart conditions, and childhood cancers are increasingly recognized as significant contributors to morbidity and mortality among children and adolescents. Despite their growing impact, pediatric NCDs are often underrepresented in health policies and global health agendas, which traditionally focus on infectious diseases or adult populations.

According to the World Health Organization (WHO) and UNICEF, NCDs are responsible for approximately 20% of all deaths among adolescents aged 10–19 globally. Moreover, over 50% of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) in this age group are attributed to NCDs, with mental health conditions such as depression, anxiety, and conduct disorders being the leading contributors. The burden is not only medical but also social and economic. Children with chronic conditions often face stigma, reduced educational opportunities, and long-term health complications. Additionally, 70% of premature adult deaths from NCDs are linked to behaviors that begin in childhood and adolescence, such as poor diet, physical inactivity, and exposure to tobacco and alcohol.

Despite this, pediatric NCDs remain under-prioritized in global health strategies. Addressing them requires a life-course approach that includes early prevention, integrated care, and supportive environments. Strengthening health systems to respond to pediatric NCDs is essential for achieving universal health coverage and sustainable development goals.

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3.

Keywords: Pediatric Non-Communicable Diseases, Child and Adolescent Health, Chronic Illness in Children, Mental Health, Early-Life Risk Factors, Global Health and NCDs

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Jul 31, 2026