Minimally Invasive Fixation of Intraarticular Calcaneal Fractures: Cannulated Screws vs. K-Wires

The management of displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures continues to evolve, with minimally invasive techniques gaining popularity due to reduced soft tissue complications.

Published in Surgery

Minimally Invasive Fixation of Intraarticular Calcaneal Fractures: Cannulated Screws vs. K-Wires
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

The management of displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures continues to evolve, with minimally invasive techniques gaining popularity due to reduced soft tissue complications. However, the optimal fixation method remains debated.

In our study published in Foot & Ankle Specialist, we compared two commonly used minimally invasive fixation techniques: cannulated screws and Kirschner wires (K-wires).

🔎 Study Overview

  • 70 patients with displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures
  • Cannulated screws (n = 34) vs. K-wires (n = 36)
  • Retrospective comparative design
  • Outcomes assessed using:
    • Maryland Foot Score (MFS)
    • Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain
    • Radiological parameters
    • Complications

📊 Key Findings

Operative time was significantly shorter with K-wires
 – K-wires: 40.5 ± 5.6 min
 – Cannulated screws: 49.5 ± 4.5 min

Functional outcomes (MFS) were comparable between both groups

Pain scores (VAS) showed no significant difference

Radiological outcomes (Böhler’s angle, Gissane angle, calcaneal dimensions) were equivalent

Complication rates were similar

💡 Clinical Takeaway

Both minimally invasive techniques—cannulated screws and K-wires—achieve excellent and comparable functional and radiological outcomes, with high patient satisfaction.

The main differentiating factor was operative time, favoring K-wires, which may be particularly relevant in high-volume settings or resource-limited environments.

⚖️ Practical Implications

This study supports a flexible, surgeon-tailored approach, where:

  • K-wires offer efficiency and simplicity
  • Cannulated screws provide stable fixation with familiar instrumentation

Ultimately, both are valid and effective options in the minimally invasive management of these challenging fractures.


📄 Minimally Invasive Reduction of Intraarticular Calcaneal Fractures With Percutaneous Fixation Using Cannulated Screws Versus Kirschner Wires
Foot & Ankle Specialist (2023)
DOI: 10.1177/1938640020987750

Ahmed Shams, Osama Gamal, Mohamed Kamal Mesregah

Article links:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33511858/

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1938640020987750


I’d be interested to hear your experience:

  • Do you favor screws or K-wires for minimally invasive calcaneal fixation?
  • Has operative time influenced your technique selection?

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in