Plastic Mulching’s Lasting Impact: How Microplastics Are Affecting Soil Health

Long-term plastic mulching leads to microplastic buildup in soils, gradually reducing soil quality and biological function—raising concerns about the sustainability of widely used agricultural practices
Plastic Mulching’s Lasting Impact: How Microplastics Are Affecting Soil Health
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Explore the Research

Springer International Publishing
Springer International Publishing Springer International Publishing

Microplastic Accumulation and Soil Quality Changes Under Varying Plastic Mulching Durations in the Mediterranean Region - Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition

Research on microplastics (MPs) in soils has been widespread, but their impact on soil quality and the effects of mulching duration are still unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine how MP accumulation in mulched agricultural soils affects soil quality across three different mulching durations. Soil samples were collected from two depths (0–10 and 10–20 cm) at 15 agricultural sites in Adana, Türkiye, representing mulching durations of 5, 10, and 30 years. Microplastics were extracted using density separation and identified with ATR-FTIR. Soil physical, chemical, and biological properties were analyzed, and Soil Quality Index (SQI) was assessed with the Soil Management Assessment Framework (SMAF), which considers soil taxonomy, climate class, slope, sampling time, texture, mineralogy, organic matter, and analytical techniques to estimate the functional potential of each soil, considering the relevant soil indicators under MP accumulation. In this study, the evaluated soil indicators included physical properties such as bulk density (BD), aggregate stability (AS), available water content (AWC), and water-filled pore space (WFPS); chemical properties such as soil pH, electrical conductivity (EC), available phosphorus (P), and exchangeable potassium (K); and biological properties such as soil organic carbon (SOC), microbial biomass carbon (MBC), and potentially mineralizable nitrogen (PMN). Our data showed clear differences in both MPs and SQI across the three mulching periods, allowing the observed patterns to be better understood. The results showed that prolonged mulch application substantially increased MP accumulation and negatively affected key physical and biological soil indicators. Long-term mulching consistently reduced SQI values, indicating a cumulative decline in soil health and ecosystem functioning. At 0–10 cm depth, MP abundances were 69.3 ± 18.2, 64.0 ± 14.39, and 48.0 ± 9.53 particles kg− 1 for short-, medium-, and long-term durations, respectively, while at 10–20 cm depth, the values were 37.33 ± 6.18, 48.0 ± 9.75, and 78.66 ± 27.76 particles kg− 1. These depth-specific patterns were accompanied by increases in bulk density (10%), substantial reductions in aggregate stability (48%), nitrogen mineralization (24%), and microbial biomass carbon (14%) with increasing plastic use (from S to L) at 0–10 cm depth. Overall, these analytical outcomes corresponded with a 17% reduction in SQI under long-term mulch application. These findings provide a solid foundation for predicting and monitoring MP contamination in agricultural soils with different mulch durations. The main limitation of this study is that, as a field-based investigation conducted under real agricultural conditions, it lacks full control over environmental and management variability, which should be considered when interpreting the results.

Plastic mulching has become a routine practice in modern agriculture, valued for its ability to conserve moisture, control weeds, and boost crop yields. Yet beneath these short-term benefits lies a growing concern: the accumulation of microplastics in soil. This study examines how years of plastic use translate into long-term changes in soil health, offering a closer look at a problem that is only beginning to be fully understood. 

The research focuses on agricultural fields with different histories of plastic mulching—ranging from a few years to several decades. By analyzing soils across these timeframes and at different depths, the study captures how microplastics build up over time. Using advanced identification techniques, the researchers quantify microplastic particles and relate their presence to a broad set of soil indicators, including physical structure, chemical properties, and biological activity. 

The findings reveal a clear pattern: the longer plastic mulching is used, the more microplastics accumulate in the soil. Over time, these particles begin to interfere with key soil functions. Indicators such as aggregate stability, water dynamics, and microbial activity show declines, pointing to a gradual degradation of soil quality. Importantly, the study uses a soil quality index to integrate these changes, showing a consistent drop in overall soil performance under long-term mulching. 

Beyond individual parameters, the results highlight how microplastics affect the soil as a system. Physical properties such as bulk density and water retention are altered, while biological indicators—including microbial biomass and nitrogen cycling—are negatively impacted. These combined effects suggest that microplastics are not just passive contaminants, but active agents influencing how soil functions and supports plant growth. 

For the broader agricultural community, the implications are significant. Plastic mulching is widely adopted across cropping systems, particularly in regions facing water scarcity or intensive production pressures. This study suggests that its long-term use may come with hidden costs, slowly undermining the very resource it aims to protect: the soil itself. 

Ultimately, the research calls for a more balanced view of agricultural technologies. While plastic mulching can deliver immediate agronomic benefits, its cumulative environmental impact cannot be ignored. For researchers and practitioners alike, the challenge now is to rethink soil management strategies—exploring alternatives, improving material design, or developing better recovery systems—to ensure that productivity gains today do not compromise soil health tomorrow.

Image credit: Mypix 

This post was created with the assistance of AI.

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in