Getting to this point was not a straightforward journey. The idea began as a simple research question, but transforming it into a publishable paper required long nights spent refining the protocol, revising tools, collecting data under real-world constraints, and constantly questioning whether the design was robust enough. There were moments of doubt during the analysis, especially when the results did not align neatly. The writing phase followed, demanding clarity, structure, and patience. Submitting the manuscript felt risky, as peer review would expose every weakness.

The review process itself tested my resilience. Critical comments necessitated careful revisions, reanalysis, and stronger justifications of methods and findings. Each round of feedback elevated the work to a higher standard. There were delays, formatting corrections, supplementary file adjustments, and small technical issues that loomed larger at the time. But persistence carried me through. Receiving the message that the article is now published makes every revision, correction, and moment of uncertainty worthwhile. It is not just a publication; it is proof of discipline, growth, and a commitment to advancing knowledge.

https://links.springernature.com/f/a/tjenmrrsHX1kUle8RrPEJQ~~/AABE5hA~/dhYku-mh33WQ0QS73qZ3fhvWWcmOCEWTQjVfh8-tczuuTgNW884qC-eONyQik3EVpRkDbz56rGLtvkvkiu7JeTCn7_DYf-_p80SSNxUiXmdjP8FIhBt38GZ9OZqLrqRdA4xu6s6w-RkWT1vl0-tfddcmQkXrnCUvkdfAbmxaoc5RZbdIPYXLaPuA3OV3-fMdiWmdLjPvmM2aTG4OGHKgq78WebTMCVE7EB1p3KL-G15H4TqJ7iFfxRJBC-nPtePObWazuWs7a3Pnlx_GIxfvjjz35zEHQB0V2asYP5rLW_c~