We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website. You can decide for yourself which categories you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available.
Further information can be found in our privacy policy.
Recent Comments
I have an experience that may somewhat belong to the "non-expected" null research. I introduced the linear expansion model through the fundamental length calibration of "Gauge blocks.". I introduced both the original model form and the approximation. It was expected to find some impactful differences between the lengths output from them. But instead, I found trivial differences, although I used highly tolerated inputs for the two model forms.
Although the large number of analyses, when I submitted the manuscript to a highly evaluated journal, I received a negative answer. So, I decided to alter the objective from getting the null hypothesis to a comparative study between the forms. I would like to share my experiment with you. I hope it may be useful