On the Increasingly Stochastic Peer Review
The peer review system is broken. But artificial intelligence won't save us. Instead, editors and conference chairs should at least try.
We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website. You can decide for yourself which categories you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available.
Further information can be found in our privacy policy.
Recent Comments
I would add an advice especially for ECRs: if you avoid the temptation to use LLMs, you will become a better scientist eventually. And I am not sure whether even attempting to improve readability and grammar are worth the risks involved; unless your English is extremely poor, minor issues should not count in peer review and among your readership.