What Your Eyes Reveal About Brain Aging and Alzheimer’s Risk

Tiny changes in pupil size can reveal how a deep brain region linked to Alzheimer’s disease works. By combining eye tracking and brain imaging, we explore how this hidden brain network changes with healthy aging.

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Explore the Research

SpringerLink
SpringerLink SpringerLink

Probing locus coeruleus functional network in healthy aging and its association with Alzheimer’s disease biomarkers using pupillometry - Alzheimer’s Research & Therapy

Background Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the leading cause of dementia, and the early detection of the disease-associated changes allows early interventions. The locus coeruleus (LC) has been reported to be the first brain region to develop tau pathology in AD. However, the functional brain network of the LC in both healthy aging and AD pathology is largely unknown due to technical difficulties associated with the small size of the LC. In this study, we used the measurement of spontaneous pupil constriction/dilation as a surrogate for LC activity to study LC brain network changes during healthy aging. Methods Thirty-seven healthy younger and thirty-nine healthy older adults were included from the Emory Healthy Brain Study and underwent resting-state functional MRI while simultaneously tracking pupil diameter. The measurements of pupil diameter dynamics were used as reference signals in brain connectivity analysis. The connectivity of the identified networks was then compared between younger and older participants. Correlations of the identified regions with neuropsychological assessments and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers were also evaluated. Results A brain network of 20 clusters associated with pupil diameter dynamics was identified, including the LC as well as brain regions functionally connected to the LC. The pupil diameter network was found to positively correlate with the salience network and negatively correlate with the central executive network. Functional connectivity decreased within the pupil diameter network with healthy aging. The pupil diameter connectivity was associated with memory, executive, and visuospatial functioning. CSF total tau closely correlated with pupil diameter network. Conclusions Pupil diameter dynamics provide valuable insights into LC-related processes. While they are not solely influenced by LC activity, spontaneous pupil constrictor/dilatory activity shows promise as a non-invasive approach to probe the LC network and warrants further studies to evaluate its value as an early biomarker of AD.

The pupil does more than respond to light—it also reflects activity in a small but powerful brain region involved in attention, memory, and Alzheimer’s disease. By tracking natural pupil changes during rest and linking them to brain scans, this study uncovers how brain networks shift with age. These insights suggest a simple, non-invasive way to study early brain changes long before symptoms appear.

Follow the Topic

Alzheimer's disease
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Clinical Medicine > Neurology > Neurological Disorders > Neurodegenerative diseases > Alzheimer's disease
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Radiology > Nuclear Medicine > Magnetic Resonance Imaging > Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Locus coeruleus
Life Sciences > Biological Sciences > Neuroscience > Neurophysiology > Circadian Rhythms and Sleep > Locus coeruleus
Brain Mapping
Life Sciences > Biological Sciences > Neuroscience > Neurophysiology > Brain Mapping
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Health Care > Medical Physics > Medical Imaging > Nuclear Medicine > Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Neuroradiology
Life Sciences > Biological Sciences > Biological Techniques > Biological Imaging > Neuroradiology

Related Collections

With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Neuromodulation in Neurodegenerative Disorders: Novel TMS Approaches and Protocols Targeting Cognition, Mood, and Biomarkers

A network‑based understanding of neurodegenerative diseases is driving renewed interest in treatments that can directly modulate disrupted brain circuits. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is emerging as a promising tool within this shift, offering a non‑invasive way to influence cortical activity and support cognitive and behavioral function. Its adaptability makes it relevant not only for Alzheimer’s disease, where cognitive decline and neuropsychiatric symptoms are central challenges, but also for disorders such as frontotemporal dementia, Lewy body diseases, and Parkinson’s disease.

TMS can be tailored through different stimulation patterns, targeted to specific networks, and integrated with pharmacological, cognitive, or rehabilitative therapies. As disease‑modifying treatments advance, there is growing interest in how neuromodulation might enhance plasticity, improve treatment responsiveness, or help manage mood and motivational symptoms that significantly affect quality of life. At the same time, progress in biomarker‑guided personalization and efforts to harmonize stimulation protocols across centers are laying the groundwork for broader clinical adoption.

This Collection highlights original research articles and reviews that advance the role of TMS in neurodegenerative disorders and clarify how neuromodulation can be incorporated into personalized, multimodal care. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to:

  • TMS protocols targeting cognition in Alzheimer’s disease and related disorders, with particular attention to cognitive, functional, and behavioral outcomes
  • Innovative stimulation approaches, including theta‑burst and accelerated paradigms
  • TMS applications for mood, motivation, and other neuropsychiatric symptoms
  • Biomarker‑informed personalization using TMS‑EEG, MRI connectivity, or other neuroimaging tools
  • Methodological optimization and multicenter reproducibility of TMS protocols
  • Mechanistic insights into TMS‑induced plasticity in aging and neurodegeneration

This is a sister Collection with Engineering TMS-Based Neurorehabilitation: Innovations for Functional Restoration in Neurological Disorders in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3, Good Health and Well-Being.

All submissions in this Collection undergo the journal’s standard peer review process. Similarly, all manuscripts authored by a Guest Editor(s) will be handled by the Editor-in-Chief. As an open access publication, this journal levies an article processing fee (details here). We recognize that many key stakeholders may not have access to such resources and are committed to supporting participation in this issue wherever resources are a barrier. For more information about what support may be available, please visit OA funding and support, or email OAfundingpolicy@springernature.com or the Editor-in-Chief.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Nov 27, 2026

Real-World Implementation of Blood-Based Biomarkers for Neurodegenerative and Neuroinflammatory Diseases

Blood-based biomarkers (BBB) are transforming the diagnostic and therapeutic landscape of neurodegenerative and neuroinflammatory diseases, offering scalable, minimally invasive tools that can expand access to precision medicine. Their rapid development in Alzheimer’s disease has accelerated efforts to integrate blood‑based testing into clinical workflows, clinical trials, and screening strategies for drug trials. At the same time, advances in biomarkers for multiple sclerosis and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis are opening new avenues for disease monitoring, prognostication, and treatment evaluation beyond traditional imaging and CSF‑based approaches.

Despite this momentum, real‑world implementation remains uneven. Regional differences in healthcare infrastructure, reimbursement, laboratory capacity, and regulatory pathways shape how and when BBB can be adopted. Equally important is the distinction between biomarkers intended for etiological diagnosis in clinical practice and those optimized for trial enrichment, patient stratification, or pharmacodynamic readouts. Ensuring analytical robustness, harmonized validation, and clear clinical interpretation frameworks is essential for responsible translation.

This Collection highlights original research articles and reviews that advance the practical deployment of BBB across neurodegenerative and neuroinflammatory diseases, clarify their clinical utility, or address the challenges of global implementation. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to:

  • BBB for Alzheimer’s disease, including Aβ and p‑tau isoforms
  • BBB for multiple sclerosis, including neurofilaments and emerging inflammatory markers
  • BBB for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and their role in prognosis and therapy monitoring
  • BBB for Parkinson’s disease
  • Clinical implementation pathways for blood‑based neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation markers
  • Regional variability in biomarker adoption and health‑system readiness
  • Analytical validation and standardization of blood assays
  • Etiological diagnosis vs. trial‑specific applications in neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation
  • Trial enrichment and patient stratification using BBB
  • Health-economic evaluation of BBB

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3: Good Health and Well-Being.

All submissions in this collection undergo the journal’s standard peer review process. Similarly, all manuscripts authored by a Guest Editor(s) will be handled by the Editor-in-Chief. As an open access publication, this journal levies an article processing fee (details here). We recognize that many key stakeholders may not have access to such resources and are committed to supporting participation in this issue wherever resources are a barrier. For more information about what support may be available, please visit OA funding and support, or email OAfundingpolicy@springernature.com or the Editor-in-Chief.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Mar 01, 2027