After the Paper: Current state of ethical challenges reported in Saudi Arabia: a systematic review & bibliometric analysis from 2010 to 2021
Published in Social Sciences, Education, and Arts & Humanities
The academic significance of health and medical research lies in its explicit contributions to existing knowledge and the development of new theories and hypotheses that advance academic progress across disciplines, progress science, and improve health outcomes. One of such papers in my research career has become Current state of ethical challenges reported in Saudi Arabia: a systematic review & bibliometric analysis from 2010 to 2021 published in BMC Medical Ethics in 2022.
Over the past decade, my medical research in the Middle East, combined with my deep interest in medical ethics, has led me to collaborate with pioneers of Islamic bioethics. Together, we aimed to identify aspects of clinical care that may be perceived differently in the West. This experience, along with my training at the Interdisciplinary Center for Bioethics at Yale University in New Haven, CT, has allowed me to explore a wide range of bioethical issues, motivating this paper.
In preparing this paper, I was mindful that while contemporary bioethical research encompasses issues such as stem cell research, genetics and biobanking, cloning, and infertility treatment, bioethics in Saudi Arabia is still in its infancy, exploring the very foundations of medical ethics. Accordingly, this study presented fundamental areas of bioethics to shed light on core ethical questions and applied ethics in Saudi Arabia. My task was not only to collect data but also to use the most rigorous methodology to ensure the validity and reliability of the data presented. In this context, I conducted a systematic review and bibliometric analysis, describing each step in as much detail as possible to enable future researchers to replicate the study in their own.
As a result, the article Current state of ethical challenges reported in Saudi Arabia: a systematic review & bibliometric analysis from 2010 to 2021 has proven to be one of the most influential works for my colleagues, international researchers, Saudi ethicists, and me. Since its publication, the article has received 34 citations, which, while not a measure of success, does demonstrate that it has generated 34 new research hypotheses not only in Saudi Arabia but throughout the Middle East.
Little did I know then that this work would also lead my colleagues and myself to the design and publication of two new articles: Knowledge, Attitude, and Behavior Toward Organ Donation and Transplantation Among Medical Students in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia and A Multicenter Study to Determine Knowledge and Perceptions on Stem Cell Donation, Transplantation Among Saudi Medical Students, published in Transplantation Proceedings by Elsevier. These studies were designed not simply to collect quantitative data, but to enable future researchers to use valid data collection instruments developed and validated specifically for medical students. Moreover, these articles demonstrated how much work remains to be done by ethicists and medical educators to educate medical students about the principles of organ and stem cell donation and transplantation. In terms of impact, these two articles received over 30 citations and have been replicated in various settings, from India to Jordan. To this day, my colleagues and I continue to receive emails requesting the use of the data collection tool. This demonstrates that researchers and scholars around the world strive not only to use and cite specific papers but also to view these articles as valid and reliable sources of information for their own work—a fundamental value of ethical research.
In generating our hypothesis for Current state of ethical challenges reported in Saudi Arabia: a systematic review & bibliometric analysis from 2010 to 2021, my colleagues and I stated:
"To the authors’ knowledge, there are no previous studies aimed to systematically identify, compile, describe, and discuss ethical arguments and concepts in the best-studied domains of bioethics in Saudi Arabia and to present cultural, social, educational, and humane perspectives."
Indeed, this paper has become a pioneering paper that has created an encyclopedic body of knowledge and has had a significant impact, thus, benefiting public health, education, and the cultural context of bioethics, as well as contributing to the expansion of the academic knowledge base.
As a summer faculty member at Yale University, I perceive this work as a complex mechanism that illustrates the various ways knowledge is generated and utilized. I firmly believe that just as I developed this idea as a Yale student with the support of my professors, one of my future students will propose a similar innovative research idea. I will undoubtedly encourage them to persist and create work that ultimately becomes a success story for many researchers and, most importantly, enhances healthcare.
References
Woodman, A., Waheed, K. B., Rasheed, M., & Ahmad, S. (2022). Current state of ethical challenges reported in Saudi Arabia: a systematic review & bibliometric analysis from 2010 to 2021. BMC medical ethics, 23(1), 82. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-022-00816-6
Woodman, A., Al-Jamea, L. H., Zahrani, E. M. A., Elsafi, S. H., Waheed, K. B., Al-Yami, F. S., Qahtani, S. H., Quiambao, J. V., Jebakumar, A. Z., & Al-Attar, B. (2022). Knowledge, Attitude, and Behavior Toward Organ Donation and Transplantation Among Medical Students in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. Transplantation proceedings, 54(7), 1690–1696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.05.034
Woodman, A., Elsafi, M. S., Zahrani, E. M. A., Jebakumar, A. Z., Quiambao, J. V., Maawadh, R. M., Aldossary, A. M., Alsakatawi, M. J., Alotaibi, Y. F., Algamdi, A. A., & Alfahad, O. A. (2023). A Multicenter Study to Determine Knowledge and Perceptions on Stem Cell Donation, Transplantation Among Saudi Medical Students. Transplantation proceedings, 55(9), 2009–2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2023.08.009
Follow the Topic
-
BMC Medical Ethics
This journal is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the ethical aspects of biomedical research and clinical practice, including professional choices and conduct, medical technologies, healthcare systems and health policies.
Introducing the Palgrave Macmillan Campaign for the Humanities
At Palgrave Macmillan we publish cutting-edge humanities research that has real-world impact. This research community brings together the voices of our authors and editorial team to highlight and publicize the value of the humanities and humanities research in our world today.
Continue reading announcementRelated Collections
With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.
Ethical challenges in outbreak response
BMC Medical Ethics is calling for submissions to our Collection, Ethical challenges in outbreak response. The emergence of infectious disease outbreaks presents numerous ethical challenges that require careful consideration by public health officials, healthcare providers, and policymakers. As outbreaks escalate, the need for rapid decision-making often clashes with the principles and values that underpin clinical and public health ethics. This Collection aims to explore these dilemmas, focusing on the intersection of ethics and crisis management during outbreak response. We welcome work that critically reassesses governance failures during the COVID-19 pandemic, other outbreaks, and/or anticipates "Disease X" scenarios. The collection seeks to provide a platform for discussing normative tensions distinctive to outbreak contexts, such as urgency, uncertainty, collective risks, and coercive powers.
Addressing ethical challenges in outbreak response is crucial for ensuring that future public health interventions are fit for purpose. In addition to substantive principles, there is now increased attention to the procedural justice that should guide public health decisions in crises, emphasizing the need for transparent, inclusive, and participatory approaches. As societies grapple with the complexities of managing outbreaks, examining these ethical dimensions will be vital for fostering public confidence and ensuring the effectiveness of interventions in future outbreaks.
This Collection welcomes critical reflection on the strengths and limits of existing ethical frameworks for outbreak response, including their capacity to address contextual complexity, power asymmetries, and global inequities.
Topics of interest include but are not limited to:
- Ethical dilemmas in resource allocation
- Tensions between individual rights and coercion for collective ends
- Consent and authorization in conditions of urgency, uncertainty, and constrained liberty
- Public trust in health systems
- Crisis management ethics
- Reciprocity and occupational risk (healthcare workers, essential workers)
- Global justice and structural inequalities
- Bioethical frameworks for outbreak response
- Ethics in pandemic preparedness
We welcome normative, empirical, and interdisciplinary contributions that critically examine how ethical commitments are negotiated, operationalized, or compromised in outbreak response.
Researchers are invited to submit their work to this Collection, showcasing insights into the ethical challenges faced during outbreak response and exploring innovative solutions to ensure ethical practices in public health.
This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3 (Good Health and Well Being) and SDG 10 (Reduced inequalities).
All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer-review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.
Publishing Model: Open Access
Deadline: Dec 11, 2026
Genomic research and ethical considerations
The intersection of genomic research and ethical considerations presents a rich field of inquiry that is increasingly relevant in today's scientific landscape. As advancements in technologies such as CRISPR and genome editing have accelerated, the ability to manipulate genetic material has raised critical ethical questions surrounding gene privacy, informed consent, and the potential consequences of genetic modifications.
Addressing the ethical dimensions of genomic research is essential as society navigates the implications of genetic testing and information. Recent developments in gene editing technologies have not only transformed therapeutic possibilities but have also highlighted the need for robust ethical frameworks to guide their application. Discussions surrounding equity in access to genomic technologies, risks of discrimination based on genetic information, and ethics surrounding privacy of genetic data are vital to ensure that advancements are made with consideration for all stakeholders involved. Facilitating dialogues among scientists, ethicists, policymakers, the public, and fostering a collaborative approach to addressing ethical dilemmas in genomic research is essential.
BMC Medical Ethics is calling for submissions to our Collection, Genomic research and ethical considerations. This Collection aims to explore these complexities and the ethical implications that arise from our growing capabilities in understanding and manipulating the human genome. We welcome research that addresses the ethical considerations surrounding genomic advancements and their implications for society. Key topics of interest for submission include, but are not limited to:
Ethical implications of CRISPR technology
Gene privacy and data protection
Informed consent in genetic testing
The role of bioethics in genomic research
Equity in access to genetic modification technologies
All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.
Publishing Model: Open Access
Deadline: Aug 21, 2026
Please sign in or register for FREE
If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in