AI Ethics in Real Life: Why Professional Judgement Still Matters
Published in Computational Sciences and Education
When people talk about Artificial Intelligence, the discussion often focuses on the technology itself. Is the AI accurate? Is it biased? Is it transparent? Can it be trusted?
These are important questions. But they are not enough.
In real life, AI is not used by machines alone. It is used by people. A teacher may use AI to support learning. A doctor may use AI to assist diagnosis. A manager may use AI to support decision making. In each case, the human professional still has to interpret the AI output, question it, and decide what is appropriate.
This is the main idea behind our newly published article, “From abstract ethics to situated practice: A bibliometric analysis of AI ethics and professional judgement,” published in Educational Technology Research and Development.
Our study looked at how AI ethics research has developed between 2009 and 2025. We analysed 282 research publications to understand how scholars are discussing AI ethics across different professional fields.
What we found is that AI ethics is no longer only about abstract principles, technical safeguards, or policy rules. The discussion is moving closer to real world practice. Researchers are increasingly talking about trust, human judgement, collaboration between humans and AI, professional responsibility and decision making that depends on context.
In simple terms, AI ethics is moving from this question:
“What rules should guide AI?”
to a more practical question:
“How do people use AI responsibly in real situations?”
This shift matters because ethical decisions cannot always be solved by a checklist. In professional practice, people often face uncertainty, competing values, institutional pressures and human consequences.
This is where we need to learn, relearn and unlearn.
We need to learn how AI works and what it can offer. We need to relearn the value of professional judgement in a world where machines can produce fast answers. We also need to unlearn the habit of treating AI outputs as neutral, final, or automatically better than human reasoning.
This is especially important in education, where teachers must think carefully about fairness, learning, assessment, student development, and academic integrity.
Education is therefore an important space for AI ethics. Schools and universities are not only places where AI tools are used. They are also places where deeper questions about intelligence, learning, fairness and human agency are actively discussed.
One key message from our article is that professionals should not become passive users of AI. AI can support decision making, but it should not replace human judgement. Responsible AI use depends not only on better technology, but also on reflective, critical and ethically aware professionals.
In short, AI ethics is not only about making AI systems responsible. It is also about helping people use AI responsibly.
Greetings, my name is Chamil Arkhasa Nikko bin Mazlan, and I am a Malaysian educator and scholar in the field of music education. I hold a Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) and a Master’s degree in Music Education from Sultan Idris Education University (UPSI), where I focused on the pedagogical and cultural dimensions of music learning. My academic foundation began with a Bachelor of Music in Performance and a Diploma in Music from ASWARA, Malaysia’s National Academy of Arts, Culture, and Heritage.
Let get connected!
Follow the Topic
-
Educational technology research and development
This is a scholarly journal focusing on research and development in educational technology.
Related Collections
With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.
Open Call for ETR&D Special Issue Proposals
Educational Technology Research and Development
(ETR&D) invites proposals for Special Issues that address timely, significant, and innovative topics in the field of educational technology research and development. We welcome ongoing submissions of Special Issue proposals from scholars who are prepared to serve as Guest Editors and who can bring together diverse, high-quality contributions aligned with ETR&D’s mission.
Scope and Expectations
Special Issues should:
- Focus on emerging, high-impact topics relevant to educational technology research, practice, or theory development.
- Include contributions that demonstrate methodological rigor, theoretical advancement, or practical significance.
- Be aligned with the standards of excellence and the scope of ETR&D.
Guest Editors are responsible for managing the peer-review process under the supervision of ETR&D's Editors-in-Chief and must uphold the journal’s editorial integrity and ethical policies.
READ FULL DETAILS HERE.
Publishing Model: Hybrid
Deadline: Ongoing
SDG 4 Quality Education Collection
Springer is calling for articles to our new Collection on Education for Sustainable Development and Global Citizenship, in support of the UN Sustainable Development Goal: SDG 4 which aims to ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all.
Education has an important role to play in giving learners the knowledge and skills needed to promote sustainable development. This collection creates a cross-disciplinary space for researchers and educators working across various types of education, from early childhood to vocational and higher education, as well as all the subject areas and educational psychology, focused on addressing this significant global issue. We bring together scholarship that supports the UN Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDGs), explores policy and community issues, and makes a difference to education for a sustainable future.
We encourage submissions including, but not limited to, the following topics:
- education for sustainable development and sustainable lifestyles
- human rights education
- education on gender equality
- peace education
- promotion of a culture of peace and nonviolence
- global citizenship
- intercultural education
- education for international understanding
- scientific literacy
- Future-oriented thinking
- inclusive education
We are happy to hear your ideas for short commentary or a collection of articles, please contact one of our publishers to discuss this before submitting.
Submission Procedure:
Submission is possible to the participating journal of your choice, please select TC: SDG4 - Quality Education in the electronic submission portal.. Accepted articles will be published in their respective journal, as well as highlighted on the Collection page. Please contact one of our publishers if you have further questions.
Publisher Contacts
Maria Noland, publisher: STEM and Medical Education
Lawrence Liu, publisher: STEM, Medical and Vocational Education
Jolanda Voogd, publisher: Language education, linguistics and learning
Publishing Model: Hybrid
Deadline: Jan 01, 2030
Please sign in or register for FREE
If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in