Analysis of environmental perception according to political ideology

We can trace the current climate denialism of the far right as a reaction to greater social awareness of environmental risks following the 2008 global financial crisis? The class struggle is also reflected in the fight against climate change.
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Explore the Research

SpringerLink
SpringerLink SpringerLink

Analysis of environmental perception according to political ideology - Discover Sustainability

This article analyses corporate environmental (ir)responsibility (CEiR) and environmental perceptions among the population of several developed economies in a context of neoliberal globalisation and accelerated climate change following the last global financial crisis, mainly in relation to corporate irresponsibility and bad business practices. This research is based on the framework of corporate social (ir)responsibility and social mobilisation against global warming and other environmental risks (e.g., 2030 Agenda). To this end, a new theoretical framework is proposed and an empirical analysis is carried out using data from the International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) covering 32 countries after the 2008 crisis. Two indices were developed for each country and the level of agreement on both ideological spectrums (left and right) was assessed. Several Rasch models were also estimated to study the suitability of environmental criteria as a tool for analysing environmental perceptions among respondents. The results show that the main factors are closely related to the gender and political ideologies of respondents. It is concluded that the political ideology of respondents, especially in contexts of global crisis, can influence social attitudes, perceptions, and behaviours on environmental issues, and even possible alliances to increase the number of international agreements on these issues.

What do you think? “Almost everything we do in modern life harms the environment”. Perhaps, “people worry too much about human progress harming the environment”. Or probably “we worry too much about the future of the environment and not enough about prices and jobs today”.

What do you think, do these issues flow upwards like magma from a volcano, or perhaps they can be seen as a constant stream that flows through a funnel, gradually permeating society? Or perhaps both views are compatible.

This article analyses corporate environmental (ir)responsibility (CEiR) and environmental perceptions among the population of several developed economies in a context of neoliberal globalisation and accelerated climate change following the last global financial crisis, mainly in relation to corporate irresponsibility and bad business practices.

This study examines national-level environmental perceptions in relation to corporate environmental responsibility, particularly in the context of the post-2008 financial crisis, a period marked by rising global protests and growing demands for environmental justice. Its main contribution lies in the development of two new indices based on ISSP data, offering a more specific and flexible alternative to broader measures such as the NEP scale. The findings reveal several implications for environmental governance in a turbulent world.

The Sustainable Development Goals, the challenges of climate change, the circular economy, and the global campaign against fossil fuels are just a few examples of issues related to the concept of sustainability. This is especially true in the context of the neoliberal economic system and global warming.

Regardless of its theoretical orientation, neoliberalism is characterised by a set of key principles (the ‘3 Ps’ of neoliberalism): a general philosophy or worldview, a broad political programme, and a set of specific policies, all with social and environmental implications.

The novelty of the article lies in linking societies’ environmental perceptions with respondents’ ideological self-identification and in attempting to incorporate this dimension into the analysis of corporate environmental (ir)responsibility (CEiR). The study is part of the CEiR's analyses, although it focuses more on social perception than on the actual actions of companies. For this reason, this research is grounded in the framework of corporate social (ir)responsibility and social mobilisation against global warming and other environmental risks (e.g., 2030 Agenda).

Lessons from recent economic history can provide clues for the future of capitalist and environmental collapse. In particular, various studies show what we can learn from the 2008 global financial crisis, helping to bring together efforts to achieve an environmentally compatible economic recovery, that is, a low-carbon economy.

The latent attribute of “environmental perception” was analysed across 15 respondent profiles defined by their degree of agreement (five categories) and ideological orientation (three levels). Each profile was considered to meet a given environmental criterion if it exceeds the threshold of equitable distribution among left-wing, centrist, and right-wing respondents for each agreement level (strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree, and strongly disagree).

The results show that the main factors are closely related to the gender and political ideologies of respondents. It is concluded that the political ideology of respondents, especially in contexts of global crisis, can influence social attitudes, perceptions, and behaviours on environmental issues, and even possible alliances to increase the number of international agreements on these issues.

The authors would like to thank Dr Georgina Cortés for her enthusiasm and constant support for scientific progress, as well as for being one of the leading disseminators and experts on Rasch methodology.

This post draws on the co-authored article by J. Agustín Franco, Jesús Rodrigo-Comino, Artemi Cerdà and Manuel Pulido, “Analysis of environmental perception according to political ideology” (Discover Sustainability, 2026), https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-026-02720-0

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Sustainability
Research Communities > Community > Sustainability
Behavioral Economics
Humanities and Social Sciences > Economics > Behavioral Economics
Scholars at Risk
Research Communities > Scholars at Risk
Industries
Humanities and Social Sciences > Business and Management > Industries

What are SDG Topics?

An introduction to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Topics and their role in highlighting sustainable development research.

Continue reading announcement

Related Collections

With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Food, Societies and Sustainability: Contemporary Concerns around Local Food Production and Consumption

Food goes far beyond nutrition. It reflects sociocultural identities and territorial heritage, consumption dynamics, economic development, public policies, sustainability concerns, food production, distribution and consumption. Understanding food production and food products, practices and strategies offers key insights into both historical traditions and contemporary lifestyles. Around the world, food and drink serve as powerful symbols of identity and attract interest through diverse value chains, economic interests and cultural expressions. On the other hand, traditional and local food systems contribute to cultural heritage, biodiversity conservation and sustainability matters from environmental, sociocultural and economic concerns.

The Collection "Food, societies and sustainability: Contemporary concerns around local food production and consumption" explores how food is locally produced, promoted and protected through public and private initiatives, food-based experiences, media platforms, and sustainable dietary and productive practices. It encourages contributions that examine how food concerns are shaped in contemporary societies, how globalization is affecting local food cultures, emphasizing the role of food as both tangible and intangible cultural heritage. Food preferences, food stereotypes, and attitudes towards food sustainability, analysed through the lenses of generational gaps and gender differences are also welcomed. This Collection seeks original research and case studies using both qualitative and quantitative methods.

Keywords: Food Systems, Food culture, Food Production, Locality, Heritage, Tourism, Gastronomy, Agricultural Biodiversity, Livestock Biodiversity, Food Sustainability, Regenerative Tourism.

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 2, SDG 3, SDG 4, SDG 5, SDG 10, SDG 12, and SDG 17.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Sep 30, 2026

Clean Water and World Sustainability

Water is the lifeblood of our planet, fundamental to all life forms and a cornerstone of human progress. Yet, despite its critical importance, ensuring universal access to clean and safe water remains a pressing global challenge. In the face of complex issues such as climate change, urbanization, and population growth, the need for sustainable water management has never been more urgent. Water security, quality, and accessibility are integral to fulfilling the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 6, which emphasizes ensuring the availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all. However, the path to water sustainability is laden with challenges, ranging from the pollution and contamination of freshwater resources to the degradation of ecosystems that support vital water cycles.

In this context, the proposed research collection, “Clean Water and World Sustainability”, aims to compile pioneering research that addresses the multifaceted issues surrounding clean water, ecosystem health, and global sustainability. This collection seeks to showcase groundbreaking solutions and interdisciplinary approaches that promote sustainable water practices while considering the broader environmental, economic, and social impacts of water use.

We welcome contributions from scholars worldwide that present original research on topics such as: (i) the impact of industrial and agricultural practices on water quality and availability; (ii) advances in water treatment technologies and wastewater management; (iii) the role of freshwater ecosystems in mitigating climate change; (iv) sustainable water governance models and policy frameworks; and (v) the interaction between water scarcity, human health, and socioeconomic development.

This collection provides a unique platform for researchers to disseminate their cutting-edge findings on transformative solutions to the world’s water crisis and contribute to global sustainability efforts. The research presented will not only inform policy decisions but also empower local communities, industry leaders, and environmental advocates to take action in safeguarding and rejuvenating this invaluable resource.

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to: SDG 6 & SDG 11

Keywords: Water Accessibility and Management; Water Security; Water Treatment Technologies; Sustainable Development; Ecosystem Health; Interdisciplinary Approaches; Sewage/Wastewater Reuse

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Sep 30, 2026