Analysis of environmental perception according to political ideology
Published in Sustainability, Business & Management, and Economics
What do you think? “Almost everything we do in modern life harms the environment”. Perhaps, “people worry too much about human progress harming the environment”. Or probably “we worry too much about the future of the environment and not enough about prices and jobs today”.
What do you think, do these issues flow upwards like magma from a volcano, or perhaps they can be seen as a constant stream that flows through a funnel, gradually permeating society? Or perhaps both views are compatible.
This article analyses corporate environmental (ir)responsibility (CEiR) and environmental perceptions among the population of several developed economies in a context of neoliberal globalisation and accelerated climate change following the last global financial crisis, mainly in relation to corporate irresponsibility and bad business practices.
This study examines national-level environmental perceptions in relation to corporate environmental responsibility, particularly in the context of the post-2008 financial crisis, a period marked by rising global protests and growing demands for environmental justice. Its main contribution lies in the development of two new indices based on ISSP data, offering a more specific and flexible alternative to broader measures such as the NEP scale. The findings reveal several implications for environmental governance in a turbulent world.
The Sustainable Development Goals, the challenges of climate change, the circular economy, and the global campaign against fossil fuels are just a few examples of issues related to the concept of sustainability. This is especially true in the context of the neoliberal economic system and global warming.
Regardless of its theoretical orientation, neoliberalism is characterised by a set of key principles (the ‘3 Ps’ of neoliberalism): a general philosophy or worldview, a broad political programme, and a set of specific policies, all with social and environmental implications.
The novelty of the article lies in linking societies’ environmental perceptions with respondents’ ideological self-identification and in attempting to incorporate this dimension into the analysis of corporate environmental (ir)responsibility (CEiR). The study is part of the CEiR's analyses, although it focuses more on social perception than on the actual actions of companies. For this reason, this research is grounded in the framework of corporate social (ir)responsibility and social mobilisation against global warming and other environmental risks (e.g., 2030 Agenda).
Lessons from recent economic history can provide clues for the future of capitalist and environmental collapse. In particular, various studies show what we can learn from the 2008 global financial crisis, helping to bring together efforts to achieve an environmentally compatible economic recovery, that is, a low-carbon economy.
The latent attribute of “environmental perception” was analysed across 15 respondent profiles defined by their degree of agreement (five categories) and ideological orientation (three levels). Each profile was considered to meet a given environmental criterion if it exceeds the threshold of equitable distribution among left-wing, centrist, and right-wing respondents for each agreement level (strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree, and strongly disagree).
The results show that the main factors are closely related to the gender and political ideologies of respondents. It is concluded that the political ideology of respondents, especially in contexts of global crisis, can influence social attitudes, perceptions, and behaviours on environmental issues, and even possible alliances to increase the number of international agreements on these issues.
The authors would like to thank Dr Georgina Cortés for her enthusiasm and constant support for scientific progress, as well as for being one of the leading disseminators and experts on Rasch methodology.
This post draws on the co-authored article by J. Agustín Franco, Jesús Rodrigo-Comino, Artemi Cerdà and Manuel Pulido, “Analysis of environmental perception according to political ideology” (Discover Sustainability, 2026), https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-026-02720-0
Follow the Topic
-
Discover Sustainability
A multi-disciplinary, open access, community-focussed journal publishing results from across all fields relevant to sustainability research whilst supporting policy developments that address all 17 of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
What are SDG Topics?
An introduction to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Topics and their role in highlighting sustainable development research.
Continue reading announcementRelated Collections
With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.
Food, Societies and Sustainability: Contemporary Concerns around Local Food Production and Consumption
Food goes far beyond nutrition. It reflects sociocultural identities and territorial heritage, consumption dynamics, economic development, public policies, sustainability concerns, food production, distribution and consumption. Understanding food production and food products, practices and strategies offers key insights into both historical traditions and contemporary lifestyles. Around the world, food and drink serve as powerful symbols of identity and attract interest through diverse value chains, economic interests and cultural expressions. On the other hand, traditional and local food systems contribute to cultural heritage, biodiversity conservation and sustainability matters from environmental, sociocultural and economic concerns.
The Collection "Food, societies and sustainability: Contemporary concerns around local food production and consumption" explores how food is locally produced, promoted and protected through public and private initiatives, food-based experiences, media platforms, and sustainable dietary and productive practices. It encourages contributions that examine how food concerns are shaped in contemporary societies, how globalization is affecting local food cultures, emphasizing the role of food as both tangible and intangible cultural heritage. Food preferences, food stereotypes, and attitudes towards food sustainability, analysed through the lenses of generational gaps and gender differences are also welcomed. This Collection seeks original research and case studies using both qualitative and quantitative methods.
Keywords: Food Systems, Food culture, Food Production, Locality, Heritage, Tourism, Gastronomy, Agricultural Biodiversity, Livestock Biodiversity, Food Sustainability, Regenerative Tourism.
This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 2, SDG 3, SDG 4, SDG 5, SDG 10, SDG 12, and SDG 17.
Publishing Model: Open Access
Deadline: Sep 30, 2026
Weather and Climate Extremes: A Special Reference to Multidisciplinary Research and Policy Developments
This Collection, titled "Weather and Climate Extremes: A Special Reference to Multidisciplinary Research and Policy Developments," focuses on the increasing global challenges posed by extreme weather events and climate phenomena. As these events intensify due to changing climate patterns, their impacts on ecosystems, infrastructure, human health, and socioeconomic systems become more pronounced, necessitating a multidisciplinary approach to understanding and addressing these complexities.
The Collection aims to bring together research from diverse fields, including atmospheric sciences, hydrology, ecology, engineering, public health, and social sciences. It encourages innovative contributions that explore cutting-edge solutions to predict, manage, and mitigate the effects of climate extremes. Topics may include advanced modelling techniques, nature-based solutions, climate-resilient infrastructure, risk assessment frameworks, and strategies for equitable policy development. The emphasis is placed on integrating scientific understanding with actionable solutions that address vulnerability, resilience, and adaptation.
Moreover, this Collection seeks to foster cross-disciplinary collaborations to bridge the gap between scientific research and policy implementation. By highlighting case studies, theoretical advancements, and practical approaches, it aims to advance the dialogue on climate resilience and inform decision-making processes globally. This platform aspires to serve as a critical resource for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers striving to navigate the escalating challenges of a changing climate.
Given the increasing frequency and intensity of climate extremes, this topic holds critical importance. Such extremes profoundly affect ecosystems, infrastructure, and human livelihoods, demanding coordinated efforts across disciplines to analyse risks, develop mitigation strategies, and inform policy. This Collection seeks to bring together cutting-edge research and innovative approaches from diverse fields, bridging scientific understanding and actionable policy frameworks. The proposed focus areas include, but are not limited to:
• Advances in modelling and forecasting weather and climate extremes
• Impacts on ecosystems, agriculture, water resources, and public health
• Nature-based solutions and climate-resilient infrastructure
• Interdisciplinary frameworks for risk management and adaptation planning
• Policy advancements addressing vulnerability, resilience, and equity
This call aims to engage a broad community of researchers, practitioners, and policymakers to enhance global discourse and support evidence-based decision-making by emphasising multidisciplinary contributions.
This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG
Keywords: Weather Extremes Modeling; Climate Change Impacts; Risk Assessment Frameworks; Nature-Based Solutions (NbS); Resilient Infrastructure Design; Equitable Policy Development; Interdisciplinary Climate Research; Adaptation and Mitigation Strategies; Socioeconomic Vulnerability Analysis; Extreme Event Forecasting
Publishing Model: Open Access
Deadline: Feb 28, 2027