Analysis of environmental perception according to political ideology
Published in Sustainability, Business & Management, and Economics
What do you think? “Almost everything we do in modern life harms the environment”. Perhaps, “people worry too much about human progress harming the environment”. Or probably “we worry too much about the future of the environment and not enough about prices and jobs today”.
What do you think, do these issues flow upwards like magma from a volcano, or perhaps they can be seen as a constant stream that flows through a funnel, gradually permeating society? Or perhaps both views are compatible.
This article analyses corporate environmental (ir)responsibility (CEiR) and environmental perceptions among the population of several developed economies in a context of neoliberal globalisation and accelerated climate change following the last global financial crisis, mainly in relation to corporate irresponsibility and bad business practices.
This study examines national-level environmental perceptions in relation to corporate environmental responsibility, particularly in the context of the post-2008 financial crisis, a period marked by rising global protests and growing demands for environmental justice. Its main contribution lies in the development of two new indices based on ISSP data, offering a more specific and flexible alternative to broader measures such as the NEP scale. The findings reveal several implications for environmental governance in a turbulent world.
The Sustainable Development Goals, the challenges of climate change, the circular economy, and the global campaign against fossil fuels are just a few examples of issues related to the concept of sustainability. This is especially true in the context of the neoliberal economic system and global warming.
Regardless of its theoretical orientation, neoliberalism is characterised by a set of key principles (the ‘3 Ps’ of neoliberalism): a general philosophy or worldview, a broad political programme, and a set of specific policies, all with social and environmental implications.
The novelty of the article lies in linking societies’ environmental perceptions with respondents’ ideological self-identification and in attempting to incorporate this dimension into the analysis of corporate environmental (ir)responsibility (CEiR). The study is part of the CEiR's analyses, although it focuses more on social perception than on the actual actions of companies. For this reason, this research is grounded in the framework of corporate social (ir)responsibility and social mobilisation against global warming and other environmental risks (e.g., 2030 Agenda).
Lessons from recent economic history can provide clues for the future of capitalist and environmental collapse. In particular, various studies show what we can learn from the 2008 global financial crisis, helping to bring together efforts to achieve an environmentally compatible economic recovery, that is, a low-carbon economy.
The latent attribute of “environmental perception” was analysed across 15 respondent profiles defined by their degree of agreement (five categories) and ideological orientation (three levels). Each profile was considered to meet a given environmental criterion if it exceeds the threshold of equitable distribution among left-wing, centrist, and right-wing respondents for each agreement level (strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree, and strongly disagree).
The results show that the main factors are closely related to the gender and political ideologies of respondents. It is concluded that the political ideology of respondents, especially in contexts of global crisis, can influence social attitudes, perceptions, and behaviours on environmental issues, and even possible alliances to increase the number of international agreements on these issues.
The authors would like to thank Dr Georgina Cortés for her enthusiasm and constant support for scientific progress, as well as for being one of the leading disseminators and experts on Rasch methodology.
This post draws on the co-authored article by J. Agustín Franco, Jesús Rodrigo-Comino, Artemi Cerdà and Manuel Pulido, “Analysis of environmental perception according to political ideology” (Discover Sustainability, 2026), https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-026-02720-0
Follow the Topic
-
Discover Sustainability
A multi-disciplinary, open access, community-focussed journal publishing results from across all fields relevant to sustainability research whilst supporting policy developments that address all 17 of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
What are SDG Topics?
An introduction to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Topics and their role in highlighting sustainable development research.
Continue reading announcementRelated Collections
With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.
Economic Responses to Environmental Challenges: Evidence, Models, and Innovations
Environmental degradation, climate change, and resource scarcity have emerged as critical global challenges, posing significant threats to economic stability, public welfare, and sustainable development. These complex issues require not only technological innovation and policy reform but also a deep understanding of the economic mechanisms that drive environmental outcomes.
In response, this Collection focuses on how economies can effectively address these threats through data-driven research, advanced modeling, and strategic policy design. The issue brings together studies that apply econometric and statistical methods—such as time series analysis, panel regression, spatial econometrics, and simulation-based models like Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs) and Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) models—to assess environmental policies and measure their economic impacts. These analytical tools are used to quantify trade-offs, predict long-term outcomes, and guide decision-making under uncertainty. By bridging economics, environmental science, and public policy, this collection deepens the empirical and theoretical understanding needed to design effective responses. It strengthens the foundation for achieving environmental sustainability alongside economic resilience.
Publishing Model: Open Access
Deadline: Jun 30, 2026
Progress on Reforms and Transitions for Sustainable Development in the Developing Countries
The United Nations recognizes 125 developing economies in 2024. These nations possess vast untapped potential, offering abundant resources and a burgeoning workforce. Their growth and development help drive global economic expansion, offer new market opportunities, and stimulate international trade and investment. Moreover, their voices are indispensable in addressing global challenges such as climate change, poverty, and inequality. In the last three decades, many developing countries have undergone significant economic and social transformations. By embracing market-oriented reforms, investing in infrastructure, education, and healthcare, and adopting sustainable practices, many nations such as China, Thailand, Vietnam, etc., have achieved remarkable progress in reducing poverty, improving living standards, and addressing environmental concerns.
As the world continues to evolve, shaped by globalization and technological advancements, it is imperative to critically examine the reforms and transitions of developing countries. By critically examining and/or analyzing both successes and failures, we can identify valuable lessons and best practices to inform and/or devise future policies and strategies desired. It is paramount that sharing knowledge and experiences among nations can foster collaboration, accelerate progress, and ensure a more sustainable and equitable future for all.
Discover Sustainability is pleased to announce a Collection focused on the latest advancements in social-economic reforms and transitions aimed at achieving sustainable development in the world’s developing nations. This Collection seeks to explore strong policies, innovative models, effective practices, and real-world case studies that address the multifaceted challenges and opportunities facing these countries. By sharing insightful findings and practical recommendations, this Collection aims to support and facilitate reforms and transitions that contribute to a more sustainable development for all countries in the coming decades.
In this Collection, original research articles and reviews are welcome. Research areas may include (but are not limited to) the following:
• Institutional reforms and economic diversification
• Financial sector development and inclusive finance
• FDI, green FDI, The Global Minimum Tax
• Trade liberalization and regional integration
• Innovation and technological advancement
• Forestry, poverty reduction and rural livelihood
• Forest transition, land transition, land use policies
• Education and human capital development
• Environment, health, and growth
• Green tourism, green logistics, green transportation
• Gender equality and women’s empowerment
• Climate change mitigation and adaptation, nature-based solutions
• Sustainable forest management, restoration, and reforestation
• Renewable energy and energy efficiency
• Circular economy, sharing economy and waste management
• Good governance and corruption control
• Democratic governance and political participation
• Rule of law and property rights
• Public sector reform and capacity building
• Green transformation, digital transformation
• Knowledge management systems, Mindspongeconomics
• Culture Tower, environmental culture, eco-surplus culture, high-quality culture
• Sustainable consumption and production
• AI technology and cross-border trade for sustainable development
This Collection supports and amplifies research related to:SDG 8, SDG 9, SDG 11, SDG 12, SDG 13& SDG 16
Keywords: Sustainable Development; Economic Reform; Green Transformation; Digital Transformation; Economic Growth; Environmental Culture; Circular Economy; Mindsponge-Mindspongeconomics; Knowledge Management System
Publishing Model: Open Access
Deadline: Jun 30, 2026
Please sign in or register for FREE
If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in