Behind the Research: Sex and Gender Medicine in Physician Training, a 10-Year Follow-Up at Cedars-Sinai

A follow-up survey reveals that despite institutional efforts, trainee exposure to sex and gender medicine remains limited, underscoring the need for deeper integration into clinical education.

Published in Education

Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Explore the Research

SpringerLink
SpringerLink SpringerLink

Sex and gender medicine in physician clinical training: a 10-year follow-up single-site survey - Discover Medicine

Purpose Increasing recognition of Sex and Gender Medicine has led to multifaceted initiatives improving patient care through physician education. Limited data exist evaluating the impact of these initiatives on physician trainees. We re-evaluated the representation of Sex and Gender Medicine in post-graduate physician clinical training at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in a 10-year follow up study. Methods Post-graduate physician trainees from medical and surgical subspecialities (n = 490) were surveyed online in 2024. Sixty-two trainees (19%) responded to questions regarding sex and gender-based medicine. The results were compared to the results of a similarly conducted survey of the same medical center in 2014. Results Most post-graduate physician trainees feel that gender medicine concepts are important (90% now vs. 88% previously, p = 0.60) and that a formal curriculum discussing gender medicine topics should be implemented in their training program (53% vs. 60% previously, p = 0.70). Trainees report that the frequency of sex/gender discussion in didactic and clinical teaching has remained low (31% reporting “often” or “very often” vs. 25% previously, p = 0.50). Most trainees (82%) endorse that increasing education on the topic limits bias and improves patient care. Most trainees continue to report incorporating sex in their clinical practice despite limited formal education (95% vs. 92% previously, p = 0.52). Conclusions Increased training in sex and gender-based medicine concepts remain desired by post-graduate physician trainees, yet minimal changes have occurred over the last decade. These findings continue to support greater efforts to implement sex and gender-based medicine concepts into clinical training programs for postgraduate physician trainees.

Why this study was necessary

In 2014, we surveyed physician trainees at Cedars-Sinai to assess how often topics related to sex (biological differences) and gender (socially constructed roles) were addressed in their clinical and didactic education. Despite growing awareness of sex and gender differences in disease patterns and treatment response, we found that most trainees reported little to no exposure.

In the years since, our institution made concerted efforts to bridge this gap. With support from the NIH-sponsored Specialized Center of Research Excellence (SCORE) and our Center for Excellence in Sex Differences in Medicine (CEC), Cedars-Sinai introduced new requirements for grand rounds, embedded sex-based decision tools in clinical practice, and launched educational workshops. A decade later, we wanted to evaluate whether these efforts had increased awareness and exposure in physician training.

What we did

In February 2024, we repeated the original survey with current residents and fellows at Cedars-Sinai. The instrument was nearly identical to the 2014 version, allowing us to directly compare trainee attitudes and perceived exposure over time.

We distributed the anonymous survey to 490 postgraduate trainees and received 62 responses, similar to the participation level in 2014.

What we found

While enthusiasm for sex and gender medicine remained strong, perceived exposure had changed little since 2014.

  • 90% of respondents in 2024 said sex and gender medicine is important, virtually identical to the 88% from 2014.
  • 53% supported a formal curriculum, comparable to 60% in 2014.
  • Only 31% reported hearing about sex and gender concepts "often" or "very often" in clinical teaching, versus 25% in 2014.
  • 95% said they incorporate sex into patient care.
  • 82% believed additional training would help reduce bias and improve care.

 

These results suggest that while trainees recognize the importance of sex and gender in medicine, this content is still not consistently taught in clinical settings.

Percentage of trainees who rated sex and gender medicine as “important,” in 2014 and 2024.

Institutional efforts and persistent challenges

Over the past ten years, Cedars-Sinai implemented several initiatives to advance sex and gender awareness in clinical education:

  • Required all CME speakers to address sex as a biological variable
  • Developed tools to integrate sex-based differences into diagnostic pathways
  • Offered SCORE-supported workshops and mentorship for trainees
  • Embedded sex and gender topics into select lectures and research projects
Institutional efforts at Cedars-Sinai to promote sex and gender medicine education, 2014–2024.

Despite these efforts, trainees still reported rare inclusion of sex and gender in their daily clinical learning. This suggests that occasional top-down interventions may be insufficient unless these concepts are routinely reinforced at the point of care by attending physicians and supervisors.

Reflections from the research team

One surprising and encouraging result was the continued increase in support from male trainees, whose endorsement of sex and gender medicine now closely matches that of female peers. This shift reflects broader cultural progress in medical education and highlights the universal relevance of these concepts to patient care.

Still, the dissonance remains: most trainees say sex and gender matter, but few report frequent exposure during their training. This gap between recognition and education underscores the need to make sex and gender medicine a consistent part of graduate medical education.

Frequency of clinical exposure to sex and gender medicine concepts, as reported by trainees.

What this means for the future of medical training

To close this gap, we recommend a multi-pronged strategy:

  1. Integrate sex and gender content across all specialties, not just as optional lectures
  2. Provide structured training for faculty to help them incorporate these topics into everyday teaching
  3. Include sex and gender medicine as required competencies for board certification
  4. Develop and share clinical decision tools that normalize SABV (sex as a biological variable) in care delivery

Although this study was conducted at a single site with a modest response rate, it reinforces national findings that change has been slow. The consistent trainee support shows there is a clear appetite for better education.

Looking ahead

From our earliest survey in 2014 to this follow-up in 2024, the story has remained remarkably consistent: trainees care about sex and gender medicine and want more education, but they are not consistently receiving it. This study helped clarify how institutional efforts have helped—and where they fall short.

Our hope is that this research sparks renewed attention to how clinical training can better reflect what we know about biological and gender-related differences. We invite other institutions to replicate similar surveys and share their findings so we can accelerate progress together.

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Medical Education
Humanities and Social Sciences > Education > Professional and Vocational Education > Medical Education

Related Collections

With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Metabolic Wellness: Addressing the Health Prevention and Management of Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes

Obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) represent two of the most pressing and interlinked public health challenges of the 21st century. With escalating global prevalence, these conditions are no longer confined to affluent nations, but are rapidly rising in developing countries, driven by sedentary lifestyles, dietary transitions, environmental factors, and genetic predispositions. This Collection aims to provide a comprehensive and multidisciplinary examination of the complex biological, clinical, epidemiological, and socio-environmental mechanisms that underpin the obesity-diabetes nexus.

We invite contributions that critically explore the pathophysiological pathways linking adiposity to insulin resistance, including the roles of chronic low-grade inflammation, adipokine signaling, mitochondrial dysfunction, and gut microbiota. Research addressing genetic and epigenetic factors, pediatric and gestational diabetes, ethnic and gender disparities, and emerging biomarkers are particularly encouraged. Furthermore, we seek discussions on intervention strategies encompassing pharmacological treatments, nutritional modulation, lifestyle interventions, and public health policy frameworks that target obesity and T2DM prevention.

This Collection will serve as an essential reference for endocrinologists, diabetologists, obesity researchers, public health professionals, nutritionists, molecular biologists, and policymakers. By integrating global perspectives and cutting-edge research, it aspires to advance understanding and foster collaborative efforts toward mitigating this dual epidemic. Prospective authors are encouraged to contribute original chapters, clinical insights, or region-specific case studies that align with the Collection’s central theme such as:

1. Gut Microbiota and the Obesity-Diabetes Axis

2. Oxidative Stress and Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Obesity and T2DM

3. Epigenetic Modifications in Obesity and Glucose Metabolism Disorders

4. Artificial Intelligence and Digital Health Tools in Managing Obesity and Diabetes

5. Community-Based Interventions for Reducing Obesity and Diabetes Prevalence

Keywords: Obesity, BMI, Diabetes, Pathophysiology, Metabolic Syndrome, Cardiovascular diseases

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Mar 31, 2026

New Trends in Clinical Laboratory Medicine

The main purpose of the issue is to explore novelties in clinical biochemistry and laboratory medicine. The issue aims to cover different emerging topic.

One significant trend in clinical laboratory medicine is the use of automation, machine learning and artificial intelligence (AI) to improve laboratory workflows, reduce turnaround times, and enhance the accuracy of laboratory test results. Laboratories are adopting automated systems that can perform sample processing, analysis, and result reporting with minimal human intervention, resulting in faster and more efficient testing processes.

Furthermore, there has been a growing interest in using machine learning algorithms to analyze large amounts of data generated by clinical biochemistry tests. These techniques can also help to identify new biomarkers, develop more accurate diagnostic tools, and improve treatment outcomes.

The development of new biomarkers for disease diagnosis and monitoring can improve disease detection and treatment.

In this context, metabolomics can be applied to biomarker discovery, drug development and personalized medicine.

Another ongoing trend in clinical biochemistry is the increased use of personalized medicine. This approach involves tailoring medical treatment to the individual patient's unique characteristics, such as their genetics and metabolism. Advances in genomic sequencing and other technologies have made it easier to identify specific biomarkers and genetic mutations that can be targeted with personalized therapies. Moreover, new rapid diagnostic techniques are requested to tackle problems such as antibiotic resistance. Overuse or misuse of antibiotics recommended by physicians/self-medication at the time of infection has meant that drug-resistant pathogens have become a major healthcare issue, with millions of reported cases every year. Rapid diagnostics plays a pivotal role in the treatment of bacterial infection. For the timely treatment of patients, a rapid antimicrobial susceptibility test (AST) is urgently needed. Advanced diagnostics would allow clinicians to more quickly determine the most effective treatment, reduce the nonspecific use of broad-spectrum antimicrobials, and facilitate enrollment in new antibiotic treatments. A rise in antibiotic resistance is a certainty, therefore, we must develop technologies that will permit rapid AST (within few hours) and are non-invasive (saliva- or urine-based) or minimally invasive. At the same time, Point-of-Care Testing (POCT) has gained significant importance in healthcare due to its potential to provide rapid and accurate diagnostic results directly at the patient's bedside or in a non-laboratory setting. POCT indeed offer rapid, accessible, and versatile diagnostic capabilities, allowing for enhanced patient management, reduced turnaround time, and improved healthcare outcomes. POCT has the potential to revolutionize the way diagnostic testing is performed and integrated into healthcare systems.

SUMMARY

Clinical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine have a central role in achieving a quick and correct diagnosis. This Special Issue plans to give an overview of the most recent advances in the field.

This special issue is aimed at providing innovative contribution on new trends and advances on clinical biochemistry related to different topics.

Potential topics include, but are not limited to:

Automated systems

Biomarkers

Metabolomics, Volatolomics

Machine learning, Artifical Intelligence

Rapid diagnostics

POCT

Keywords: POCT, Biomarkers, Metabolomics, Volatolomics, Machine learning, Artifical Intelligence, Rapid diagnostics, Automated systems

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Jan 30, 2026