Unmasking Senescence in CAR T-cell Therapy: A Costimulation-Mediated Alliance or Adversity?
Published in Cancer and Cell & Molecular Biology

The idea of engineering T cells with a synthetic receptor to more effectively kill cancer cells began more than three decades ago. Since the 1990s, chimeric antigen receptor T (CART) cell therapy has been refined and resulted in several FDA-approved therapies. In 2017, two CD19-targeting CART products, Kymriah (tisagenlecleucel) and Yescarta (axicabtagene ciloleucel), were FDA-approved after showing unprecedented success in subsets of patients with leukemia and lymphoma. The key difference between the two products is the costimulatory domain (CSD), a part of the CAR which enhances the anti-tumor activity of CART cells. Tisagenlecleucel is equipped with 4-1BB costimulation (BBζ), while axicabtagene ciloleucel is equipped with CD28 costimulation (28ζ).
The choice of CSD contributes to distinct CART cell behavior; generally, studies have found that BBζ generates a milder but longer-lasting response, while 28ζ has a shorter but stronger response against cancer cells. Further analysis suggests that 28ζ is more prone to exhaustion, a well-known dysfunctional T cell state, than BBζ. However, regardless of the CSD used, more than half of patients treated with CART cells relapsed within the first year of treatment.
Exhaustion is a widely accepted reason for CART cell failure. However, exhaustion is not the only dysfunctional T cell phenotype. T cell senescence is another suboptimal T cell fate, but its role in CART cell failure had not been studied. T cell senescence develops as a response to several stressors commonly seen in patients with cancer, including chemotherapy, radiation, strong stimulation, and extended interaction with cancer cells. Although both T cell exhaustion and senescence result in impaired T cell activity, the underlying mechanisms and clinical treatment can be quite different. Therefore, it is imperative to assess the role of senescence in CART cell failures.
Due to the aggressive, relapsing nature of cancer, CART cells repeatedly interact with malignant cells. To simulate this chronic CART cell activation in the lab, CART cells are commonly activated with cancer cells in multiple coculture cycles in vitro. During these activation cycles, we adapted this model with a key difference to distinguish between exhaustion and senescence. Exhaustion is often considered reversible, while senescence is a permanent cell fate. In our model, we introduced a rest time between activation cycles to generate activated/rested CART cells. The rest time proved critical to allowing exhaustion marker expression to fall back to baseline levels. Despite expressing similar levels of exhaustion markers, repeatedly activated/rested CART cells showed impaired T cell activity compared to basal CART cells in vitro and in vivo, suggesting that CART cells can be impacted through mechanisms beyond exhaustion.
Further analysis with activated/rested CART cells revealed that CART cells undergo several changes which are similar to those seen in senescent T cells. These changes are more prominent in BBζ than 28ζ and coincided with MYC activation in only BBζ. MYC is an oncogene, and oncogene activation is a well-known senescence inducer. We found that ectopic MYC activation seemed to impair only BBζ. Alternatively, we induced senescence by mildly irradiating CART cells. To our surprise, the efficacy of 28ζ, but not BBζ, improved upon irradiation-induced senescence. These results were consistent with published patient data which showed that senescent 28ζ but not senescent BBζ correlated with better clinical outcomes.
In conclusion, we studied the role of senescence in CART cell dysfunction through multiple models, including a fast and scalable model using repeated activation/resting cycles. This model allows senescent T cells to be studied and provides a platform to form a more complete understanding of CART cell failures. Our study identifies senescence as a failure mechanism mainly in BBζ. This study not only provides a more comprehensive understanding of CART cell failures but also provides opportunities to generate more durable CART cell treatment protocols through removal of senescent cells. Our study sought to better understand CART cell failure, with the ultimate goal of developing more durable CART cell therapy and improved patient outcomes.
Study Title: Differential susceptibility and role for senescence in CART cells based on costimulatory domains
Published: June 2025, Molecular Cancer
Read it here: https://molecular-cancer.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12943-025-02371-1
Follow the Topic
-
Molecular Cancer
This journal promotes the exchange of ideas, concepts and findings in any area of cancer and related biomedical science, from a molecular point of view.
Related Collections
With collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.
Cell Death Mechanisms in Cancer
This Collection focuses on the various and complex mechanisms of regulated cell death, a central theme in cancer development, progression, and treatment response. We invite submissions related to both traditional and emerging pathways, including apoptosis (programmed cell death involving caspases), autophagy (self-degradation of cellular components for survival or death), necrosis (uncontrolled cell lysis often linked to inflammation), necroptosis (programmed necrosis mediated by RIPK3 and MLKL), ferroptosis (iron-dependent lipid peroxidation-driven cell death), pyroptosis (inflammatory caspase-mediated lytic death), cuproptosis (copper-dependent death associated with mitochondrial stress), parthanatos (DNA damage-driven, PARP-mediated death), and anoikis (detachment-induced apoptosis which play a critical in metastasis).
Special attention will be given to translational and clinical studies, such as how these pathways influence tumor immune evasion, therapy resistance, and the development of novel targeted treatments.
Submissions may include original research, reviews, and clinical studies on how regulating these pathways can improve cancer outcomes.
All submissions in this collection undergo the journal’s standard peer review process. Similarly, all manuscripts authored by a Guest Editor(s) will be handled by the Editor-in-Chief. As an open access publication, this journal levies an article processing fee (details here). We recognize that many key stakeholders may not have access to such resources and are committed to supporting participation in this issue wherever resources are a barrier. For more information about what support may be available, please visit OA funding and support, or email OAfundingpolicy@springernature.com or the Editor-in-Chief.
Publishing Model: Open Access
Deadline: Feb 27, 2026
Please sign in or register for FREE
If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in