What do play-fighting and pessimism tell us about pain in calves?

Understanding how calves play and whether they’re a pessimist or an optimist may provide insight into their experiences of pain following a common husbandry procedure.
What do play-fighting and pessimism tell us about pain in calves?
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Explore the Research

SpringerLink
SpringerLink SpringerLink

Pain and pessimism affect calves’ play behaviours post-disbudding - Discover Animals

Calves are expected to play less when in pain, and more pessimistic individuals may be more affected by painful events, such as hot-iron disbudding (i.e., horn-bud removal). We explored 1) the impact of disbudding on different play behaviours, predicting that those involving the head (e.g., play-fighting) may be more sensitive to disbudding due to the injury location, and 2) the effect of ‘pessimism’ (assessed using the judgement bias test) on changes in play post-disbudding. Holstein female calves (n = 19) were housed in groups of 10, individually tested for judgement bias at 25 days old, and disbudded following the farm’s standards (including sedation and local anaesthesia) at 45 days old. Individual and parallel locomotor play and play-fighting were recorded for 4 h/day (from 1800 to 2200 h) for 5 days before disbudding, on disbudding day, and for 7 days after. Play-fighting reduced after disbudding compared to baseline and did not recover over 7 days. Locomotor play did not change on disbudding day and increased on the day after compared to baseline. More pessimistic calves did not show greater changes in play post-disbudding, but they showed a smaller increase in locomotor play on the day after disbudding, suggesting they did not recover as well as the others. Overall, play-fighting (i.e., pushing with the head) may be a more sensitive indicator of disbudding pain than other play behaviours, likely reflecting calves avoiding evoked pain, which may persist for at least 7 days. Our results also add to the growing literature demonstrating that pessimistic expectations affect animals’ ability to cope with stressors.

On commercial farms, it’s common practice to prevent horns from developing by burning the horn buds with a hot iron. Even when pain control is applied, it’s highly likely that they experience significant pain in the hours and days following the procedure. However, asking how calves feel after disbudding is challenging, especially because they may have evolved to hide their pain.

What does calf play say about pain?

Imagine a group of preschoolers in the playground; you might see some playing tag, while others are rough-and-tumble wrestling. Calves are the same – they run alone, they run together, they jump, they kick, and they play-fight.  One way to ask a calf about pain is to observe their play, assuming that the less they play, the worse they feel.

Two calves engaging in play-fighting. Image made with ChatGPT (OpenAI).

In this study, after disbudding, the calves kept running around, but play-fighting was almost eliminated over the next 7 days. Why? Looking at how calves play-fight, this makes sense – calves might avoid banging heads if the disbudding injury is still painful even about 7 days post-disbudding. Or perhaps it hurt once, and they become afraid of play-fighting altogether.

Changes in play-fighting duration from “baseline” (before disbudding) to 7 days after disbudding (seconds of play-fighting per 4 hour daily observation). Adapted from Figure 1 in the paper (doi: 10.1007/s44338-025-00105-7) using ChatGPT (OpenAI).

Is the bucket of milk half empty?

So, calves feel pain after disbudding, but just like people, they likely all handle it differently. This can be related to whether your glass (or bucket of milk) is half full or half empty. Like humans, more pessimistic calves may expect pain to be worse and end up experiencing it more negatively.

All calves, whether pessimist or optimist, stopped play-fighting after disbudding. On the other hand, most of them actually ran around more than before on the day after disbudding, potentially to make up for the lost play-fighting or to cope with stress. But what about the pessimistic ones? They didn’t show quite the same increase in running, suggesting they weren’t recovering in the same way or not at the same pace.

Next steps?

Implication 1: Better or longer pain relief needs to be explored for calves after disbudding.

If calves don’t play-fight for up to a week after disbudding, this likely tells us that they need better pain relief. Unlike us, they can’t reach for paracetamol themselves, so more research is needed on the best schedules of pain treatment to ensure they are free from pain and can play with their friends.

Implication 2: More pessimistic calves may have worse or longer-lasting experiences of pain

It’s easy to accept that “one size doesn’t fit all” for humans, and this idea needs to be extended to non-human animals like calves. We need to better understand how each calf experiences pain so that we can tailor their care to them, much like we would try to do with patients in a hospital.

Interested in the interplay between pain, play, and pessimism in calves? Read the full paper here.

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Animal Science
Life Sciences > Biological Sciences > Zoology > Animal Science
Animal Ethics
Life Sciences > Biological Sciences > Veterinary Science > Animal Ethics
Animal Cognition
Humanities and Social Sciences > Behavioral Sciences and Psychology > Comparative Psychology > Animal Cognition

Related Collections

With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Next-Generation Biomonitoring: Leveraging eDNA and Molecular Tools for Animal Conservation

As global biodiversity faces unprecedented pressure, the need for rapid, non-invasive, and scalable monitoring tools has never been greater. This Collection focuses on the transformative role of environmental DNA (eDNA), metabarcoding, and high-throughput sequencing in understanding animal populations. We seek to move beyond simple species detection toward integrating molecular data with ecological modeling.

We invite contributions that explore:

· Standardization of eDNA protocols for terrestrial and aquatic vertebrates.

· Integration of multi-omics to assess population health and genetic diversity.

· The use of non-invasive sampling to monitor elusive or endangered species.

· Advancements in wildlife forensics and the tracking of illegal trade through molecular markers.

Keywords: Environmental DNA; Metabarcoding; Non-invasive monitoring; Conservation genetics; Population genomics; Wildlife forensics.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Dec 16, 2026

Wildlife Trade and Zoonotic Diseases

This Collection invites contributions that explore the relationship between wildlife trade and zoonotic disease transmission. The trade in wild animals, both legal and illegal, domestic and international, is significant in the emergence and spread of zoonotic diseases (here defined as the bidirectional interchange of infectious pathogens between animals and humans). With the trade chain wild, animals and humans are in close contact, creating opportunities for pathogens to cross from one species to another, including from and to humans. This can lead, and has led, to major outbreaks and pandemics. Points where this cross-over may happen include the catching and butchering of wild animals, their transportation and handling, their trading in markets, as well as their consumption or other use. Increasing the likelihood of transmission are the conditions in which the animals are in (cramped, unhygienic, stressful) and with a wide range of species being grouped together. In this Collection, we want to bring together studies that approach the links between wildlife trade and zoonotic diseases from various angles and at different stages, including ones that focus on the people involved, the animals that are traded, and the (potentially) zoonotic diseases they may carry.

Keywords: pathogens, animal trade, Asia, One Health, human health, bushmeat, wet markets

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Aug 07, 2026