Dosimetric investigation of small fields in radiotherapy measurements using Monte Carlo simulations, CC04 ionization chamber, and razor diode

In very small radiation fields, even sub-millimeter variations in beam properties can produce noticeable dosimetric deviations. This raises an interesting question: are we facing only detector challenges — or deeper modeling limitations?
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Explore the Research

Springer International Publishing
Springer International Publishing Springer International Publishing

Dosimetric investigation of small fields in radiotherapy measurements using Monte Carlo simulations, CC04 ionization chamber, and razor diode - Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine

The motivation of this study is to check the dosimetry of small field sizes used in various treatment techniques using different methods (Monte Carlo simulations and detectors). We created two Monte Carlo models for Elekta Versa HD linear accelerators using EGSnrc (BEAMnrc-DOSXYZnrc) codes. Previous studies led us to define one model with an ideal symmetry full‐width‐half‐maximum (FWHM) of 0.15 cm in the x and y directions for the Gaussian distribution of the primary electron source and redefine the other with a larger asymmetry FWHM of 0.35 cm in the X and 0.6 cm in the Y directions. We calculated the penumbra width using both models. We measured output factors using two different detectors including Razor Diode which is designed especially for small field size measurements and compared them with both models. Using these detectors aims to investigate different detector sensitivities for dose measurements. In addition, patient-specific planning quality assurance (PSQA) for four fictional cases using Elekta Versa HD with Nasopharyngeal, Astrocytoma, right cerebellum, and right breast cancers were done using an IBA—2D array and compared to the minimum segment width parameter in Monaco Treatment planning system (TPS) for (0.5 and 1) cm segment width. The results indicated that Monte Carlo simulation shows increasing in the values of penumbra width with increasing the size of FWHM for field size range 0.5 × 0.5 to 3 × 3 (in-plane: 0.33 to 0.45 for model 1 and 0.46 to 0.65 for model 2, cross-plane: 0.29 to 0.38 for model 1 and 0.44 to 0.62 for model 2). The results indicate that output factors decrease as FWHM increases. The Razor Diode and CC04 detectors show consistent results up until a field size of 1 × 1 cm2. Additionally, plans with a minimum segment width of 0.5 cm demonstrate a lower gamma passing rate (GPR) compared to those with a 1 cm segment width. In conclusion, Inaccurate modeling of the FWHM of the primary source can lead to a significant error in the calculation when using a Monte Carlo model of the beam; Accordingly, this may lead to inaccurate delivery of treatment dose for cancer patients, in addition, this error increases as we go down field size 1 × 1 cm2 to reach an unacceptable level in field size 0.5 × 0.5 cm2. Thus, and as found, we can conclude that: to produce a more accurate radiotherapy treatment plan which in turn will lead to high-quality treatment for cancer patients, It is recommended that, during the beam-shaping process in IMRT or VMAT optimization, the minimum dimensions of any individual beamlet or segment within the treatment field should not be smaller than 1 × 1 cm2.

Over the past few years, small-field dosimetry has advanced significantly, particularly with the rise of stereotactic and highly modulated treatments.

However, as field sizes approach the sub-centimeter regime, the agreement between measurement, TPS modeling, and Monte Carlo simulations can sometimes diverge in ways that are not purely detector-related.

Monte Carlo methods are often considered the gold standard in dose calculation. Yet in practice, several coupled factors influence the final agreement:

Beam source width and stability

Accelerator tuning and steering

MLC modeling and head scatter representation

Detector perturbation effects

Commissioning assumptions based on conventional field sizes

When segment sizes reach 1 cm or even 0.5 cm, very small variations in electron source width or beam alignment can lead to measurable output factor differences.

This suggests that the discussion may be shifting from “which detector is correct” toward how accurately the beam itself is represented in both measurement and modeling frameworks.

This raises the question of whether current protocols fully capture the sensitivity of these regimes.

I’m curious to hear perspectives from researchers and clinical physicists working in:

• small-field dosimetry

• Monte Carlo modeling

• beam commissioning and tuning

• SRS/VMAT physics

Are we mainly facing detector limitations — or are we beginning to observe the practical limits of current modeling approaches?

Short visual research video

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Go to the profile of Mina Magdy habib
20 days ago

In my view, the next step is advancing Monte Carlo algorithms via the Boltzmann transport equation—especially for small field dosimetry.

Follow the Topic

Medical Physics
Physical Sciences > Physics and Astronomy > Applied and Technical Physics > Medical Physics
Computational Physics and Simulations
Physical Sciences > Physics and Astronomy > Theoretical, Mathematical and Computational Physics > Computational Physics and Simulations
Radiation Dosimetry and Radiation Protection
Physical Sciences > Physics and Astronomy > Biophysics > Radiation Dosimetry and Radiation Protection
Biomedical Devices and Instrumentation
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Clinical Medicine > Biomedical Devices and Instrumentation
Radiation Dosimetry and Radiation Protection
Physical Sciences > Physics and Astronomy > Applied and Technical Physics > Medical Physics > Radiation Dosimetry and Radiation Protection
Radiation Dosimetry and Radiation Protection
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Health Care > Medical Physics > Radiation Dosimetry and Radiation Protection

Related Collections

With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Advancements and future directions of quantum technologies in the medical domain

In recognition of the United Nations 2025 International Year of Quantum Science and Technology, this special issue of Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine aims to explore the latest advancements and future directions of quantum technologies in the medical domain, with a focus on applications relevant to medical physics and biomedical engineering.

Motivation and Scope:

This special issue is motivated by the rapidly evolving landscape of quantum technologies and their potential to revolutionize healthcare. We seek contributions that go beyond existing medical devices and technologies that utilize basic quantum phenomena (such as standard MRI or SQUID magnetometers) to focus on emerging quantum technologies or significant enhancements to existing technologies that leverage quantum principles.

Within medical physics and biomedical engineering, this special issue focuses on applying quantum science and technology. We seek work demonstrating how unique quantum phenomena like superposition, entanglement, coherence, tunnelling, quantization of light, and quantum confinement enable new capabilities or yield performance superior to classical methods (e.g., in sensitivity, resolution, speed, computation, security).

Illustrative examples of topics within scope include, but are not limited to:

Advanced Quantum Sensing: Innovative quantum sensor designs for medical diagnostics (e.g., next-generation optically pumped magnetometers for MEG/MCG, nitrogen-vacancy centre thermometry), quantum probes for single-molecule detection, and quantum-enhanced techniques for medical imaging (like quantum-noise limited imaging or entanglement-assisted MRI).

Quantum Computing Applications: Development and application of quantum algorithms for drug discovery, protein folding, medical image analysis, radiation treatment planning optimization, and predictive modelling in healthcare.

Quantum Imaging Techniques: Exploration of quantum ghost imaging, imaging with entangled photons for enhanced resolution or reduced dose, and the use of advanced quantum detectors.

Secure Medical Data Handling: Applications of quantum communication and quantum key distribution for ensuring the privacy and security of medical data.

Translational and System Aspects: Contributions addressing the challenges and opportunities in translating quantum technologies from lab to clinic, including aspects of engineering, manufacturing, supply chain, regulatory pathways, and economic feasibility.

We are keen to feature contributions from across the entire quantum ecosystem relevant to medicine. This includes fundamental research from academia, technological development from industry, clinical perspectives on the potential impact and requirements of these technologies, insights into manufacturing and supply chain challenges, and discussions on policy and regulatory frameworks. We welcome original research articles, comprehensive reviews, forward-looking perspectives, opinion pieces, and bibliometric studies that help map the landscape, identify key trends, and foster the growth of this interdisciplinary field.

By bringing together diverse perspectives from researchers, engineers, clinicians, and industry professionals, this special issue aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the state-of-the-art and future potential of quantum technologies in medical physics and biomedical engineering, driving innovation and accelerating their adoption in healthcare.

Publishing Model: Hybrid

Deadline: Ongoing