A Journey Through Birth Defects: From Trainee to Pediatrician’s Perspective

In our context, lack of consistent documentation makes it difficult to fully understand the true burden of birth defects. This realization, together with my early clinical experiences in neonatology, motivated me to explore this field more deeply, not only as a clinician but also as a researcher.
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Explore the Research

BioMed Central
BioMed Central BioMed Central

Patterns and risk factors of birth defects in Bangladesh: evidence from a neonatal intensive care unit - BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Introduction Birth defects constitute substantial contributor to neonatal mortality and morbidity particularly in low and middle income countries. In Bangladesh, limited screening and low awareness contribute to delayed diagnoses and inadequate care. This study aimed to delineate the patterns of birth defects and identify associated risk factors to provide baseline data in a tertiary care neonatal intensive care unit in Bangladesh to support future surveillance, inform policy development, and guide preventive strategies. Methods This hospital based prospective observational study was conducted in the Department of Neonatology at Chittagong Medical College Hospital, Bangladesh, from August to December 2020. Neonates with birth defects were identified through detailed clinical examination and classified according to the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification. Relevant data were collected using a predesigned questionnaire. Data were analyzed in SPSS version 28. Logistic regression was done to identify perinatal risk factors. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Among 5,223 admitted neonates, 183 (3.5%) had birth defects. Musculoskeletal anomalies were most common (67 cases), followed by cleft lip/palate (30), circulatory (29), chromosomal (24), eye, ear, face and neck (23) anomalies. Among these neonates, 56 (30.6%) died, with a 1.59 fold higher mortality risk compared to those without defects (95% CI: 1.15–2.18; p = 0.005). Maternal hypertension (AOR: 3.92; 95% CI: 2.56–5.99; p < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (AOR: 4.15; 95% CI: 2.37–7.27; p < 0.001), polyhydramnios (AOR: 7.33; 95% CI: 2.63–20.41; p < 0.001), and oligohydramnios (AOR: 10.19; 95% CI: 3.68–28.23; p < 0.001) were strongly associated with birth defects. Conclusions The study highlights the significant burden of birth defects and associated neonatal mortality. Musculoskeletal anomalies were the most frequently observed defects. Maternal hypertension and diabetes mellitus were identified as strong predictors, warranting targeted antenatal screening and timely intervention. Routine neonatal examination at community level as well as in hospital is recommended to facilitate early detection and proper referral of birth defects.

Many years ago, during my honorary training in neonatology, I encountered newborns with various types of birth defects, many of which I was seeing for the first time. Unfortunately, many of these babies did not survive. During this period, I became familiar with terms such as malformation, deformation, and disruption, and my curiosity about congenital anomalies grew.

At that time, I had a mobile phone with a camera whose resolution was not very good—much like my level of training at that early stage of my career. Nevertheless, I started documenting the cases I encountered. By the end of my three-month training period, I had collected enough material to prepare a presentation on the congenital anomalies I had seen during that time.

My teachers appreciated my effort to collect local data, and that moment marked the beginning of my journey into the field of birth defects.

The irony is that, many years later, the fate of many children born with birth defects remains unchanged for various reasons, including limited awareness, delayed diagnosis, and inadequate access to specialized care. It is high time that we strengthen our efforts to prevent birth defects, improve early detection, and ensure better care for affected children and their families.

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Go to the profile of Olena Yelizarova
22 days ago

Thank you for raising this important issue and for sharing such a personal and formative clinical experience.

This topic is also very close to my own professional path. My PhD research was devoted to the frequency of congenital anomalies among live births in Ukraine, and it served as a pilot study for the implementation of a Genetic Monitoring Programme. That programme no longer operates in its original form, but the work done during that period became part of a much longer and very difficult path toward systematic early detection of hereditary and congenital conditions.

In Ukraine, this path has taken almost two decades and has contributed to the development of neonatal screening and prenatal testing/diagnostic approaches aimed at earlier diagnosis, timely treatment, and prevention where possible. It was not a quick or simple process, and your post is an important reminder that behind every public health programme there are years of clinical observation, local data collection, advocacy, and persistence.

I fully agree that we still need stronger awareness, earlier diagnosis, better referral pathways, and more accessible specialized care for children with birth defects and their families.

Go to the profile of Syeda Humaida Hasan
15 days ago

Thank you very much for sharing your remarkable journey and for highlighting the long-term efforts required to establish a sustainable system for congenital anomaly surveillance and early diagnosis.

I look forward to exploring your work to gain knowledge and insights from the European experience in establishing genetic monitoring and birth defect surveillance systems. In Bangladesh, we are still far from developing a national birth defects registry; however, your experience provides valuable lessons and inspiration. I sincerely hope that, with sustained efforts in research, advocacy, and policy development, we will one day be able to establish such a system in our country.

Go to the profile of Olena Yelizarova
22 days ago

Your emphasis on consistent documentation is especially important. Without reliable registration and monitoring, birth defects remain visible mainly as individual clinical tragedies, but not as a measurable public health burden.

Follow the Topic

Biomedical Research
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Biomedical Research
Public Health
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Public Health

Related Collections

With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Mental health during and after pregnancy

The mental health of birthing people is a critical consideration that fundamentally affects the lives of parents, infants, and entire communities. Recent years have seen a growing recognition of the importance of addressing mental health issues in pregnant individuals, culminating in significant advancements in our understanding of associated conditions such as depression and anxiety. Despite this progress, it is crucial to continue advancing our collective knowledge in this area to ensure optimal care for parents and children alike.

The Collection invites researchers and clinicians in fields including obstetrics, maternal-fetal medicine, psychology, psychiatry, social work, and midwifery to contribute research that explores topics including, but not limited to, psychotherapy interventions during pregnancy and postpartum, the prevalence of perinatal mood disorders and its effects on the partner's mental health, the impact of maternal mental health on neonatal outcomes, innovations in screening for maternal mental health conditions (including depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress symptoms) along with support systems for high-risk pregnancies, and risk factors associated with postpartum mental health disorders. Submissions must include research that begins during preconception, pregnancy, or within six months postpartum. Studies may extend beyond this period, but they must originate within this timeframe to be in scope.

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3: Good Health & Well-Being.

All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Mar 01, 2027

Respectful maternity care - Part II

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth is calling for submissions to our Collection on Respectful maternity care - Part II.

The World Health Organization defines respectful maternity care (RMC) as care that maintains dignity, privacy, and confidentiality of pregnant and birthing women, ensures freedom from harm and mistreatment, and enables informed choice and continuous support during labor and birth. RMC is considered a fundamental human right. Despite the acknowledged importance of providing RMC to all women, many women still experience disrespect and abuse during labor and birth across global contexts.

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth is calling for submissions on ‘Respectful maternity care’ to bring together research on the benefits of respectful maternity care and the challenges in its implementation, both at the provider level and the system level. Both qualitative and quantitative research are welcome. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to, prevalence of disrespect and abuse in maternity care, implementation of respectful maternity care, RMC and maternal and neonatal outcomes, interventions to enhance and promote RMC, RMC in postnatal care, and effective communication and informed choice.

All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.

All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Aug 12, 2026