Anchorless vs Anchor-Based Rotator Cuff Repair: Similar Outcomes, Lower Costs? Insights From a Randomized Controlled Trial

Can Anchorless Rotator Cuff Repair Deliver the Same Results at a Lower Cost?

Published in Healthcare & Nursing and Surgery

Anchorless vs Anchor-Based Rotator Cuff Repair: Similar Outcomes, Lower Costs? Insights From a Randomized Controlled Trial
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Rotator cuff tears are among the most common causes of shoulder pain and dysfunction, with arthroscopic repair considered the standard surgical treatment. While anchor-based techniques are widely used, they contribute substantially to procedural costs. This raises an important question: can anchorless transosseous repair achieve comparable outcomes while reducing financial burden?

In our prospective randomized controlled trial, we compared arthroscopic single-row anchor repair with arthroscopic transosseous anchorless repair in patients with small- to medium-sized rotator cuff tears. Sixty-two patients were randomized equally between the two treatment groups and followed clinically using validated outcome measures, including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), and range-of-motion assessments.

Both techniques demonstrated significant improvements in shoulder function, pain, and mobility. At final follow-up, patients in both groups achieved excellent and nearly identical clinical outcomes, with no significant differences in ASES scores, OSS scores, or range of motion. Importantly, the transosseous anchorless technique achieved these outcomes at a substantially lower implant cost.

These findings suggest that anchorless transosseous repair may represent a highly cost-effective alternative to traditional anchor-based repair for selected rotator cuff tears, particularly in healthcare systems where resource utilization and value-based care are increasingly important considerations.

As healthcare costs continue to rise worldwide, should cost-effectiveness become a larger factor in selecting rotator cuff repair techniques? We welcome your thoughts and experiences.

Article links

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40109510/

https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0976566225000475

Mustafa Mohamed MesrigaMohamed Kamal MesregahsportsAhmed Abdel-Monem DewidarHany Elsayed SaadAyman Mohamed Ebied

#Orthopaedics #ShoulderSurgery #RotatorCuffRepair #Arthroscopy #SportsMedicine #ValueBasedHealthcare #ClinicalResearch #RandomizedControlledTrial #OrthopaedicResearch #SpringerNature

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Sport Orthopaedics
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Clinical Medicine > Orthopaedics > Sport Orthopaedics
Orthopaedics
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Clinical Medicine > Orthopaedics
Surgical Orthopedics
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Surgery > Surgical Orthopedics
Sport Orthopaedics
Humanities and Social Sciences > Society > Sport Science > Sports Medicine > Sport Orthopaedics
Sports Medicine
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Clinical Medicine > Sports Medicine