Behind the Paper: Survey of lived experiences and challenges in hepatitis B management and treatment

Over 250 million individuals are living with hepatitis B worldwide, most remain unaware of their infection. Major barriers to accessing diagnostics, routine management and treatment exist. Values and preferences of people with lived experience are essential to understand barriers.
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Explore the Research

BioMed Central
BioMed Central BioMed Central

Survey of lived experiences and challenges in hepatitis B management and treatment - BMC Public Health

Almost 300 million people are living with chronic hepatitis B infection worldwide and most remain undiagnosed and at risk for liver cancer. In 2015 the World Health Organization (WHO) developed guidelines for the prevention, care, and treatment of persons with chronic hepatitis B and in early 2023 began to work on updating these guidelines. In March 2023, a self-administered, anonymous online survey was launched, aiming to identify patient preferences related to the clinical management of hepatitis B including current management, treatment, and care experiences, preferences regarding engagement with providers, and preferences related to simplifying hepatitis B care access. A sample of 560 individuals living with hepatitis B (self-identified as HBsAg positive) from 76 countries completed the survey. Key findings demonstrated that less than half (49%, N = 268) of participants regularly visited a doctor to check the health of their liver (every 6–12 months), with 37% of participants prescribed antiviral medication by a specialist (82%, N = 167) or general practitioner (13%, N = 26). Participants reported not being actively involved in care decision making with their providers (42%, N = 217), with an overwhelming majority wanting to participate in hepatitis B management and treatment choices (85%, N = 435). Participants provided qualitative and quantitative details using open-ended responses within the survey about challenges with medication affordability and receiving care from a knowledgeable provider. Overall findings demonstrated key gaps in care, management, and treatment access related to hepatitis B: identifying these gaps can be used to identify areas for improvement along the care continuum for viral hepatitis. The survey found a need for the comprehensive simplification of clinical management and health care services related to hepatitis B. A thematic analysis of the open-ended survey responses highlighted major overarching themes including the cost and access burdens associated with hepatitis B management and treatment, and challenges in finding knowledgeable providers. Results from this mixed methods survey were used to inform the WHO hepatitis B guidelines update. Efforts should continue to explore public health approaches to address barriers and facilitators to testing, care, and treatment for people with hepatitis B to improve awareness of hepatitis B and access, care, and treatment among patients and providers.

Over 250 million people are living with hepatitis B worldwide and approximately 20 to 30 percent of those infected will develop life-threatening complications, including cirrhosis and liver cancer. Globally, the majority of individuals remain undiagnosed, and out of care. Individuals who are aware of their infection, particularly within low and middle income countries,  face significant health disparities (including costs for testing, management and treatment, access to a knowledgeable health care provider, stigma and discrimination) that limit the ability to following to the standard guideline recommendations for treatment and management.

 What inspired this study?

 To gain a better understanding of the values and preferences from people with hepatitis B regarding their care, our team conducted a survey to better understand diagnostics, treatment and management preferences and barriers to accessing care for hepatitis B. This study reports on survey findings and provides insight into the current lived experiences of people with hepatitis B and suggestions for improving care service delivery and management. The survey results can be used to inform key updates and considerations to hepatitis B clinical management and treatment recommendations within future hepatitis B guideline development.

 Why is it important?

Despite significant mortality, only approximately 10% of people with hepatitis B are diagnosed and therefore there is a major diagnostic and care gap for those with hepatitis B worldwide. Disparities and limited clinical management including treatment, particularly in low and middle-income countries (LMIC), is a significant challenge for those diagnosed with hepatitis B. There is limited literature about patient values and preferences related to testing, management and treatment of hepatitis B. Our intent is   to fill that gap and call attention to the need for more research in this space.

 What makes this study unique?

This study was unique in that it was a global survey examining lived experiences and treatment preferences for those with hepatitis B. It is one of the first that examines treatment values and preferences.

Did this study show anything unexpected?

Almost all individuals responding to the survey expressed the desire to be involved in care and treatment decisions around their hepatitis B management. This encourages the need for more shared decision-making models of care delivery including peer support for people with hepatitis B and strengthened relationships between providers and their patients. Additionally, having a knowledgeable health care worker and one that could empathize with those with hepatitis B was a challenge for many, particularly those in low- and middle-income countries. This emphasizes the low knowledge and awareness among health care providers and the need for enhanced hepatitis B specific training of providers. Access to affordable testing and treatment was a major barrier of care for people with hepatitis B due to the high out-of-pocket expenses required for hepatitis B management.

 What is the wider significance of the study findings?

Takeaways from this study involve addressing access to management and care challenges reported within this survey so guidelines and recommendations can be applicable to those directly impacted by hepatitis B. Another significant finding is the need for expansion of health care worker training to ensure accurate and appropriate management for hepatitis B occurs within health care settings. The third major point is that shared decision making is a key aspect of care delivery and should be integrated within hepatitis B service delivery. And finally, survey findings demonstrate the social and psychological consequences associated with a hepatitis B diagnosis like stigma and discrimination. The stigma and discrimination associated with hepatitis B have also been linked to poor knowledge of hepatitis B among both providers and the general public and misconceptions around hepatitis B transmission. Education surrounding hepatitis B among both the general population and providers is essential to reduce these negative consequences of hepatitis B that impact those diagnosed.

Peer support: Downs LOKabagambe KWilliams S, et al. Peer support for people living with hepatitis B virus—A foundation for treatment expansionJ Viral Hepat2024001-10. doi:10.1111/jvh.13952

 Freeland, C., Qureshi, A., Wallace, J. et al. Hepatitis B discrimination: global responses requiring global data. BMC Public Health 24, 1575 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18918-8

Freeland, C., Mendola, L., Cheng, V. et al. The unvirtuous cycle of discrimination affecting people with hepatitis B: a multi-country qualitative assessment of key-informant perspectives. Int J Equity Health 21, 77 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-022-01677-6

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Go to the profile of Mohamed Baklola
over 1 year ago

Great story and well-conducted study

Follow the Topic

Hepatitis B virus
Life Sciences > Biological Sciences > Microbiology > Virology > Hepatitis B virus
Viral Hepatitis
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Clinical Medicine > Diseases > Infectious Diseases > Hepatitis > Viral Hepatitis
Viral Hepatitis
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Clinical Medicine > Diseases > Gastrointestinal Diseases > Liver Diseases > Hepatitis > Viral Hepatitis
Public Health
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Public Health

Related Collections

With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Male reproductive health

BMC Public Health invites submissions to our new Collection, "Male reproductive health”. Male reproductive health is an essential yet often overlooked aspect of public health that encompasses various factors affecting men's fertility and overall well-being. Issues such as declining sperm counts, poor sperm quality, the impact of environmental exposures and the effects of lifestyle and dietary factors on reproductive outcomes are gaining increasing attention.

This Collection seeks to examine the multifaceted influences on male reproductive health, considering environmental, infectious and sociocultural dimensions that affect male reproductive parameters and contribute to fertility challenges. Continued research in this area could help identify causative factors and contribute to advances in public health policies, ultimately benefiting future generations.

Key topics of interest include, but are not limited to:

Environmental pollution and reproductive health

Sperm count trends and implications for fertility

The role of occupational exposures in male fertility

The effects of infectious diseases on sperm parameters

Impact of diet and lifestyle factors on sperm quality and fertility

Psychological factors influencing reproductive health

Interventions for improving male reproductive health

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to Sustainable Development Goal 3- Good Health and Well-Being.

All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Dec 27, 2025

Aging and disability

BMC Public Health is calling for submissions to our Collection on Aging and disability.

Age-related diseases, chronic conditions, and impairments profoundly impact functional change among older adults. The consequences of this are manifold, encompassing diminished independence, reduced quality of life, increased risk of falls and injuries, heightened healthcare utilization, and greater caregiver burden. These factors collectively contribute to the complex challenges faced by individuals, families, healthcare systems, and society at large in addressing the needs of aging populations living with disabilities.

This collection aims to illuminate the multifaceted dynamics of aging and disability by exploring their interplay and implications for individual well-being, healthcare systems, and societal structures. We are particularly interested in receiving submissions which address the following:

• Falls prevention strategies

• Cognitive and physical impairment in aging

• Compression of morbidity and functional disability in aging

• Assistive technologies for elderly independence

• Age-related vision and hearing impairment

• Long-term care services and supports

• Social isolation among older adults with disabilities

• Aging, disability, and mental health

• Rehabilitation approaches for age-related disabilities

• Palliative care for elderly individuals with disabilities

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being and SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities.

All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Dec 12, 2025