Bridging the Gap in Pharmacy Education: Why We Investigated Self-Medication Among Future Drug Dispensers in North-Central, Nigeria
Published in Healthcare & Nursing and Public Health
-
When we think about rational drug use and antimicrobial stewardship, our minds naturally turn to qualified prescribers, seasoned clinical pharmacists, and hospital wards. But where do the foundational habits of healthcare delivery truly take root?
They begin in the classroom, long before a trainee steps behind a community pharmacy counter or into a clinical facility.
In our newly published study in BMC Public Health, my co-authors and I set out to investigate a crucial yet frequently overlooked group within the health workforce pipeline: pharmacy technician students.
The Reality on the Ground
In many low- and middle-income countries—including Nigeria—pharmacy technicians serve as the backbone of primary healthcare delivery and community drug distribution. They are often the first point of contact for patients seeking swift, affordable relief for common ailments.
However, during our interactions with trainees in North-Central, Nigeria, a subtle paradox became evident: While these students were actively learning the principles of pharmacology and rational drug use, many were routinely self-medicating without professional guidance.
This observation sparked a critical research question: If future healthcare dispensers engage in risky self-medication practices during their training, how will this influence their clinical advice, dispensing behaviors, and professional stewardship in the future?
What Our Findings Revealed
Our empirical investigation among pharmacy technician trainees uncovered several key insights:
- High Prevalence & Easy Access: Self-medication was widespread, driven largely by peer advice, leftover medications, and easy access to over-the-counter and prescription-only medicines.
- The Drivers Behind the Habit: Academic stress, perceived familiarity with drugs, and the urge to manage mild symptoms quickly without visiting health centers were primary motivators.
- The Cognitive Gap: While students possessed theoretical knowledge about drug side effects and resistance, this knowledge did not automatically translate into safe personal health practices.
Why This Research Matters for Global Public Health
Addressing self-medication is not merely an academic exercise—it is a frontline defense against antimicrobial resistance (AMR), adverse drug reactions, and irrational medicine use.
If we hope to build resilient healthcare systems, institutional intervention must start early:
- Curricular Reform: Health training institutions must move beyond teaching purely theoretical pharmacology. We need practical modules focused on personal health-seeking behavior, rational self-care, and professional ethics.
- Institutional Stewardship: Training centers need accessible, confidential, and responsive student health services to reduce the reliance on self-diagnosis and self-treatment.
- Role Modeling: Instilling strong rational drug use habits during training ensures that graduates enter the workforce as proactive advocates for safe medicine use.
Moving Forward
We invite researchers, educators, and public health practitioners across the Springer Nature community to join this conversation. How is your institution addressing health-seeking behaviors among health trainees?
Read the full open-access article in BMC Public Health:
Health ROI Architect, BioPolicy Strategist, Pharma Economic Futurist and Therapeutics Pioneer
Follow the Topic
-
BMC Public Health
An open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health.
Related Collections
With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.
HIV stigma
BMC Public Health is calling for submissions to our Collection on HIV stigma, which remains a critical barrier to achieving optimal health outcomes for individuals living with HIV. Stigma undermines their quality of life, access to healthcare, and overall well-being. Despite significant advancements in treatment and prevention, discrimination and stigma continue to perpetuate fear, isolation, and misinformation within communities.
The urgency to address HIV stigma is heightened in the context of global health initiatives, as we strive for a more inclusive society where individuals living with HIV are empowered, well-informed, and treated with dignity. This Collection aims to gather cutting-edge research and diverse perspectives that illuminate the multifaceted nature of HIV stigma, highlighting the intersections of culture, policy, and public health that shape the experiences of those affected.
The Collection welcomes scholarship that not only documents stigma but also advances new ways of understanding and responding to it. We particularly invite work that examines stigma as a social, structural, and relational force that shapes care, rights, intimacy, and everyday life for people living with HIV.
The scope of this Collection encompasses a range of topics related to HIV stigma, including but not limited to:
- Qualitative research that foregrounds the knowledge, agency, and perspectives of people living with HIV and others affected by stigma
- Psychosocial dimensions of stigma experienced by people living with HIV
- The role of HIV awareness campaigns in combating stigma
- Innovative and community engaged approaches to measuring or addressing stigma
- Policy analyses addressing stigma in healthcare settings
- Intersectional analyses of stigma across gender, sexuality, age and migration, social, environmental or structural determinants of health contributing to discrimination
- Impacts of digital spaces, media narratives, and global health governance on stigma
This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3: Good Health & Well-being and SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities. We strongly encourage submissions from the global south and from teams that include community partners and lived experience experts.
All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer-review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.
Publishing Model: Open Access
Deadline: Dec 01, 2026
Digital exclusion and health equity
Digital exclusion poses significant barriers to health equity, particularly in the context of an increasingly technology-driven healthcare landscape. Many individuals, especially from underserved communities face challenges in accessing digital health resources, including telehealth services, electronic health records, and health information online, alongside challenges from other social determinants of health. This Collection seeks to explore the intersection of digital health access and health equity, focusing on the disparities that arise from unequal access to digital tools and resources.
Addressing digital health exclusion is critical for promoting health equity and ensuring that all individuals can benefit from advancements in digital health. Recent strides in telehealth and digital health interventions have demonstrated the potential for technology to improve access to care, yet they also reveal significant disparities that must be acknowledged. By understanding the factors that contribute to eHealth disparities, we can develop targeted digital inclusion strategies that address the unique needs of diverse populations, ultimately fostering a more equitable health system.
Topics for submission include but are not limited to:
- Equitable digital health systems: policy, infrastructure, and community engagement
- Digital health access among underserved communities
- Digital literacy and health outcomes across diverse populations
- Innovations and implementation strategies for bridging digital health gaps in underserved communities
- Measuring and monitoring digital health disparities: metrics and methodologies
This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3 (Good Health and Well Being) and SDG 10: (Reduced Inequalities).
All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer-review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.
Publishing Model: Open Access
Deadline: Dec 11, 2026