Conducting the Rhizosphere Symphony: How Much Do Plants Change Their Tune?

Agricultural management and plant selection both shape microbial communities, but what happens when they interact? We show that a single corn genotype influences microbial community composition and interactions differently under long-term organic vs. conventional management.

Published in Microbiology

Conducting the Rhizosphere Symphony: How Much Do Plants Change Their Tune?
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Explore the Research

BioMed Central
BioMed Central BioMed Central

Agricultural management and plant selection interactively affect rhizosphere microbial community structure and nitrogen cycling - Microbiome

Background Rhizosphere microbial communities are key regulators of plant performance, yet few studies have assessed the impact of different management approaches on the rhizosphere microbiomes of major crops. Rhizosphere microbial communities are shaped by interactions between agricultural management and host selection processes, but studies often consider these factors individually rather than in combination. We tested the impacts of management (M) and rhizosphere effects (R) on microbial community structure and co-occurrence networks of maize roots collected from long-term conventionally and organically managed maize-tomato agroecosystems. We also explored the interaction between these factors (M × R) and how it impacts rhizosphere microbial diversity and composition, differential abundance, indicator taxa, co-occurrence network structure, and microbial nitrogen-cycling processes. Results Host selection processes moderate the influence of agricultural management on rhizosphere microbial communities, although bacteria and fungi respond differently to plant selection and agricultural management. We found that plants recruit management-system-specific taxa and shift N-cycling pathways in the rhizosphere, distinguishing this soil compartment from bulk soil. Rhizosphere microbiomes from conventional and organic systems were more similar in diversity and network structure than communities from their respective bulk soils, and community composition was affected by both M and R effects. In contrast, fungal community composition was affected only by management, and network structure only by plant selection. Quantification of six nitrogen-cycling genes (nifH, amoA [bacterial and archaeal], nirK, nrfA, and nosZ) revealed that only nosZ abundance was affected by management and was higher in the organic system. Conclusions Plant selection interacts with conventional and organic management practices to shape rhizosphere microbial community composition, co-occurrence patterns, and at least one nitrogen-cycling process. Reframing research priorities to better understand adaptive plant-microbe feedbacks and include roots as a significant moderating influence of management outcomes could help guide plant-oriented strategies to improve productivity and agroecosystem sustainability.

The rhizosphere has long been described as the zone of influence of plant roots1, but roots are not the only influence on soil microorganisms in this important region. Agricultural management practices such as fertilization and crop rotation shape soil physical and chemical properties and influence which bacteria and fungi survive and thrive. Upon establishment, plant roots then recruit a subset of microorganisms from bulk soil, establishing the unique microbial community that will inhabit the rhizosphere in a sort of one-time “rhizosphere snapshot” driven by host selection. At least, that’s how the story was thought to go.

However, while sampling for other projects at the Russell Ranch Century Experiment, a long-term agricultural system trial initiated 25 years ago, we started to question whether complex, dynamic rhizosphere processes are really established in such a static manner. For example, this trial has shown differences in the amount of soil organic matter and the soil microbial communities between conventional, organic, and integrated management systems. It has also shown variation in the availability of nutrients such as nitrogen from organic and synthetic sources even when the total amount applied is constant2. Wouldn’t plants require different root-associated microbial communities, then, in organic systems where nutrients must be obtained through mineralization of cover crops and compost rather than readily available synthetic fertilizer? Instead of a “rhizosphere snapshot”, what if plant roots are active conductors of an ongoing “rhizosphere symphony”, with each plant genotype upregulating specific microbial taxa and functions as a conductor brings together different sections of instruments?

We hypothesized that a single maize genotype would recruit management-system-specific rhizosphere communities in plots under long-term organic management as compared to the conventionally managed plots. To understand how plants shape not only which microbes are present but also how they interact with one another and what they do, we investigated microbial taxonomic composition, co-occurrence networks, and nitrogen-cycling functional genes.

We found that plant selection does moderate the influence of agricultural management on rhizosphere microbial communities, although bacteria and fungi respond differently from one another. A single maize genotype recruited management-system-specific taxa and shifted N-cycling pathways in the rhizosphere, distinguishing this soil compartment from bulk soil. Plant effects acted as an equalizing influence on bacterial communities, making rhizosphere microbiomes from conventional and organic systems more similar to one another in diversity and network structure than communities from their respective bulk soils. In contrast, fungal community composition was mainly affected by management practices, but network arrangements were mostly driven by plants.

Our finding that plants change their tune in different management systems highlights the essential role of roots in orchestrating rhizosphere microbiome assembly and processes. With further research into the underlying mechanisms, we may be able to manipulate the sound of the symphony by talking to the conductor: plant-driven strategies may be instrumental in maximizing beneficial rhizosphere interactions for sustainable agricultural productivity.

 

1.         Hiltner, L. Über neuere Erfahrungen und Probleme auf dem Gebiete der Bodenbakteriologie unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Gründungung und Bräche. Arbeiten der Deutschen Landwirtschafts-Gesellschaft 98, 59–78 (1904).

2.         Wolf, K. M. et al. The century experiment: the first twenty years of UC Davis’ Mediterranean agroecological experiment. Ecology 99, 503–503 (2018).


Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Microbiology
Life Sciences > Biological Sciences > Microbiology
  • Microbiome Microbiome

    This journal hopes to integrate researchers with common scientific objectives across a broad cross-section of sub-disciplines within microbial ecology. It covers studies of microbiomes colonizing humans, animals, plants or the environment, both built and natural or manipulated, as in agriculture.

Related Collections

With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Animal Gut Nutrition and Greenhouse Gas Mitigation

Animal Microbiome, Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology and Microbiome call for submissions to the collection on Animal Gut Nutrition and Greenhouse Gas Mitigation.

Efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from livestock systems increasingly hinge on innovations in animal gut nutrition. The dynamic relationship between the gut microbiome and nutrient utilization plays a pivotal role in shaping methane output, feed efficiency, and overall sustainability. Advances in microbial ecology—particularly in understanding the role of gut microbiome in nutrient metabolism—are opening new pathways for mitigating emissions while enhancing productivity. These developments support the implementation of climate-smart agricultural strategies to address climate change and its impacts.

Looking ahead, continued research in this field has the potential to yield innovative solutions such as targeted probiotic supplementation, which could further optimize gut function and enhance nutrient absorption. These advancements may lead to reduced greenhouse gas emissions while improving animal health and productivity. By deepening our understanding of the animal gut microbiome, we can contribute significantly to sustainable agricultural practices that benefit both the environment and food security.

We invite researchers to contribute to this special Collection on Animal Gut Nutrition and Greenhouse Gas Mitigation. Topics of interest include but are not limited to:

- Animal Gut Microbiome and Feed Efficiency

- Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Strategies

- Rumen Fermentation Dynamics

- Nutrient Utilization in Livestock

- Probiotic Supplementation Effects

- Sustainable Livestock Production Practices

- Climate-Smart Agriculture Innovations

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 13, Climate action.

All submissions in this collection undergo the relevant journal’s standard peer review process. Similarly, all manuscripts authored by a Guest Editor(s) will be handled by the Editor-in-Chief of the relevant journal. As an open access publication, participating journals levy an article processing fee (Animal Microbiome fees, Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology fees, Microbiome fees). We recognize that many key stakeholders may not have access to such resources and are committed to supporting participation in this issue wherever resources are a barrier. For more information about what support may be available, please visit OA funding and support, or email OAfundingpolicy@springernature.com or the Editor-in-Chief of the journal where the article is being submitted.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Sep 04, 2026

The Apple Microbiome

Microbiome and Environmental Microbiome are calling for submissions to our Collection on the Apple Microbiome.

With world apple production estimated at 84 million tons, the microbiome of the apple has significant implications for agriculture, food security, and human health. Understanding the complex interactions between apple plants and their associated microbial communities can lead to improved crop management strategies, enhanced fruit quality and longevity, and sustainable agricultural practices. Recent advances have highlighted the role of specific bacteria and fungi in promoting plant health and resilience against specific pathogens. Moreover, detailed profiling of these microbial communities, revealing their diversity and functional potential facilitate exciting future developments, such as the identification of beneficial microbial consortia for biocontrol and the formulation of tailored probiotic treatments for both plants and humans. By advancing our collective understanding in this area, we can work towards a more sustainable and resilient agricultural system.

Topics of interest include but are not limited to:

-Microbial diversity and function associated with apples

-Effects of soil health and rhizosphere interactions on apple production

-Impact of climate change on the apple microbiome

-Role of the apple microbiome in fruit quality

-Microbiome-driven strategies for disease resistance

This collection is open for submissions from all authors on the condition that the manuscript falls within both the scope of the collection and the journal it is submitted to.

All submissions in this collection undergo the relevant journal’s standard peer review process. Similarly, all manuscripts authored by a Guest Editor(s) will be handled by the Editor-in-Chief of the relevant journal. As an open access publication, participating journals levy an article processing fee (Microbiome, Environmental Microbiome). We recognize that many key stakeholders may not have access to such resources and are committed to supporting participation in this issue wherever resources are a barrier. For more information about what support may be available, please visit OA funding and support, or email OAfundingpolicy@springernature.com or the Editor-in-Chief of the journal where the article is being submitted.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Aug 05, 2026