Heads or tails? A new look at birthing strategies of extinct marine reptiles

Published in Ecology & Evolution

Heads or tails? A new look at birthing strategies of extinct marine reptiles
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

In 2020 at the start of the pandemic I listened to an online talk by Drs Martin Sander and Nicole Klein on their thoughts on ichthyosaur birth. Their paper on a pregnant Cymbospondylus (the first pregnant specimen for this genus) had been published earlier that same year in the Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. In the talk, they discussed how the new specimen contradicted the prevailing hypothesis: that ichthyosaurs obligatorily gave birth tail-first due to the presumed risk of asphyxiation during birth. Their talk immediately grabbed my attention as I had had my doubts about this hypothesis for some time. I had a chance to talk further about this problem with Nicole and colleague Dr. Torsten Scheyer early in 2021. We quickly decided that the topic of ichthyosaur birth merited further study. I had already located two specimens of Mixosaurus within the depths of the palaeontological collections in Zürich that were pregnant but had not been published; one was still largely unprepared. We had the specimen prepared by an excellent preparator specialized in fossils from the Monte San Giorgio region of Switzerland and northern Italy. Simultaneously, I came into contact with Daniel Blackburn, an expert in reptile reproductive biology, who also expressed doubts about the “asphyxiation risk” hypothesis. He was very happy to come on board the project and was a major help for us, as he had the biological expertise we mostly lacked. Together, we were ready for the analysis.

What animal group did we look at: We looked at the extinct clade of Ichthyosauria. These are dolphin-like reptiles that inhabited the seas during the Mesozoic (i.e., they were alive roughly when dinosaurs roamed the land). Ichthyosaurs usually ate fish or squid, which we know because some have stomach content preserved. More importantly, we know from fossil evidence, especially from the famous Holzmaden locality in southern Germany, that these animals gave birth to live young. There is even one specimen preserved with the fetus exiting the birth canal. This specimen can be seen at the Natural History Museum in Stuttgart, Germany and I strongly recommend to everyone to have a look! For this paper we also specifically looked at the early diverging ichthyosaur Mixosaurus. This genus is important for our understanding of ichthyosaur birth as it represents a more derived, but still early form of this group. We were lucky to be able to study three different specimens, which are all housed in the paleontological collections of the University of Zürich.

What we discovered: Animals are born in a variety of ways. In mammals, we are accustomed to seeing either the head come out of the birth canal first (such as in humans), or the tail/pelvic region. The same is true for the marine reptile group Ichthyosauria. When the first pregnant specimens of these animals were found, the fetus was usually in a position to be born tail-first, which is similar in the also aquatic dolphins. An old hypothesis as to why dolphins would be born tail first was that if the fetus would come out head-first the risk of drowning would be much higher. This hypothesis got established in the literature without much scrutiny or evidence. We then surveyed birth preference in many aquatic and terrestrial tetrapods and we found that both head- and tail-first births occur regardless of birthing medium. In ichthyosaurs specifically, we discovered that the early diverging Triassic forms showed a head-first birth more often than the more derived dolphin-like Jurassic and Cretaceous forms that preferred a tail-first birth. All of this together led us to hypothesize that head- or tail-first birth is likely a result of change in morphology over evolutionary history or of maternal trim control during gestation.

Why do we study this?: I think gaining knowledge of the natural world is intrinsically valuable and we should encourage curiosity-driven research on any topic in nature. Specifically, regarding this study: We are very interested in the factors influencing the plethora of ways animals give birth, and their influence on maternal and foetal survivorship. Surprisingly little research has been done on the evolution of certain birthing preferences. We hope we have fit a little piece to that puzzle with this research.

A very special moment fossilized: the specimen of Stenopterygius quadriscissus SMNS 6293; on the right you see the fetus exiting the birth canal. Photo credit: Uli Schmid/SMNS

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Ecology
Life Sciences > Biological Sciences > Ecology

Related Collections

With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Ancient DNA and ancient proteins

In recent years, significant advancements in DNA extraction, sequencing technologies, mass spectrometry-based methods, computing power, and analytical techniques have transformed the study of ancient DNA and proteins. These developments have greatly expanded palaeontological and evolutionary research possibilities, offering a clearer window into the past. Additionally, this knowledge can assist researchers in predicting future ecological changes.

We welcome submissions on topics including, but not limited to:

• Paleoecology and ecosystem reconstructions: Insights from paleogenomic and paleoproteomic data to study past biodiversity, ecosystem dynamics, and species-environment interactions

• Extinct species and megafauna: Spatial and temporal distribution of extinct taxa, including Pleistocene megafauna, and their responses to environmental change

• Adaptation, domestication, and admixture: Genetic and protein-based evidence to uncover evolutionary processes in ancient populations

• Conservation and extinction: Lessons from ancient genomes and proteins to understand extinction dynamics and inform modern conservation efforts

• Ancient plants and microbial communities: Novel approaches to reconstruct past vegetation, microbial evolution, and marine ecosystems

• Theoretical advances: Rates of evolutionary change, population history, phylogeny, and species response to climate change and anthropogenic impacts

• Technical challenges and innovations: Addressing PCR biases that favor model or contaminate DNA, Preventing DNA degradation and improving DNA recovery, tackling incomplete reference databases, computational methods to improve sequence identification, taxonomic assignment, and noise filtering in highly fragmented datasets and developing frameworks for verifying and integrating data from multiple reference sources

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Aug 27, 2026

Wetland ecology

In support of World Wetlands Day 2026, BMC Ecology and Evolution invites submissions for an article collection focused on research that informs efforts to manage, restore, and conserve wetlands.

Wetlands are areas where either salty or fresh water is present on the surface or just below the soil, encompassing a diverse range of habitats from fens to mangroves. Despite covering only 6% of the Earth's surface, wetlands support an abundance of life, hosting 40% of all plant and animal species. They provide important ecosystem services, such as water purification and flood control, and serve as carbon sinks, helping to combat climate change.

However, wetlands are disappearing at an alarming rate. Over the past 50 years, we have lost 35% of the world's wetlands. The primary drivers of this loss include human activities such as draining and filling wetlands for agricultural and construction purposes, pollution, overfishing, resource overexploitation, the introduction of invasive species, and the impacts of climate change.

We invite submissions of research on topics including, but not limited to:

  • Impact of environmental stressors on wetland ecosystems (e.g. forecasting changes in wetland species distributions under climate and anthropogenic pressures)
  • The role of keystone species in wetland restoration and management
  • Mechanisms driving invasive species success in wetlands
  • Functional roles of biodiversity in maintaining wetland ecosystem services
  • Nature-based approaches for flood mitigation and water management (e.g. to remove excess phosphorus)
  • Ecosystem restoration: challenges and successes (e.g. mangroves, seagrass meadows and abandoned agricultural landscapes like rice paddies)
  • Integrating ecological, social, and policy frameworks to enhance wetland resilience

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 14: Life Below Water and SDG 15: Life on Land.

All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Dec 01, 2026