One Article Can Change Your Life

At last, after dedicated two years, my article was published but was it enough? No. I need to share my feelings too. Researches became insufficient when to express our feelings. So i decide to share the story “behind the paper”.

Published in Social Sciences and Public Health

Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Explore the Research

SpringerLink
SpringerLink SpringerLink

Attitudes of doctors and nurses towards people living with HIV: an analysis of sociodemographic correlates - Discover Health Systems

Background HIV-related stigmatization among healthcare workers is still high. The aim of the study is to determine the attitudes of doctors and nurses towards people living with HIV (PLWH), to measure their level of knowledge about HIV, and to determine correlations between attitudes and sociodemographic data. Methods This was a cross-sectional study. Doctors and nurses at Izmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital were included in this study. The study was performed as a face-to-face and online survey. The sociodemographic data form and AIDS Attitude Scale (AAS) were administered to the participants. The results were analyzed with the IBM SPSS 24.0 programme. The significance level was accepted as p < 0.05. Results A total of 404 people were included in our study. 301 (74, 5%) of the participants were female, and 103 (25, 5%) of the participants were male. The average age of the participants was 33.25 ± 8.22 years. Most of the participants were aged 24–30 years (55, 9%), and the negative attitudes of doctors and nurses towards PLWH were found to increase with age. Compared with registrar doctors and nurses, specialist doctors have more positive and empathetic attitudes and less avoidance. Conclusion Attitudes of participants are generally mild-high positive but negative attitudes towards PLWH are common among doctors and nurses. Regular education is needed for nurses and registrar doctors to increase confidence in HIV and reduce negative attitudes towards PLWH. However, additional quantitative studies are needed to identify interventionable points to increase empathy towards PLWH.

“I have read an article and it changed my life”Pamuk would start with that sentence if he were me. I will not start with such powerful phrase because I am just “writing “not a “writer”, there is a huge difference between two of them,I believe.But I genuinely decided to work on this topic after reading a perspective article about one HIV (+) patient who has decided to stop their anti-retroviral therapy.The writer of that article was GP of that patient and the GP highlighted very important point in that article: as a doctor,even with just warm talking and friendly touching to the shoulder of patient,we can change our patients’ life. We can encourage our patients to continue with treatment. I was about to find a topic for my finishing thesis and I wanted to conduct a “social” research. After that article, I inspired from that GP and I said to my self “how was the attitudes of the healthcare workers in my hospital towards people living with HIV?”, “did we overcome our prejudice?”, “do we still stigmatize the HIV (+) patients?”…After such questions, I talked with my supervisor and we started that long journey. Unfortunately, starting was not easy because of rejections. We rejected 3 times by ethical approval committee. Reasons were the same “questions are harsh and stigmatizing”. We were shocked. How can we measure the peoples’ attitude without asking questions state stigmatization. So we needed to change some questions and we needed to restrict our participants with just doctors and nurses. Our plan was measuring attitudes of  all staff in the hospital and compare their attitudes with other group but we could not. My heart was little bit broken but a research was not about the feelings, it was about the “data”.

Researches need to be analytic and scientific, to reduce bias they need to be far from their feelings. Feelings can effect the results if your are deeply connected with. Thats true but you need to ask your self  “do I need to lose my feelings to become a good researcher?” Of course not. Despite of losing you need to connect and follow your feelings. Without loving the topic you are working on you cannot maintain  discipline that you need to finish your work. I spend two years. Without the feelings in my heart I could not finish this job.
 

Long story short, journey started with just one article and ended with another article. I hope my work and my words also can inspire the other researches and they can make our dreams come true with broaden our work or just following their hearts.

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Public Health
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Public Health
Health Policy
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Public Health > Health Policy
Health Policy
Humanities and Social Sciences > Society > Sociology > Health, Medicine and Society > Health Policy
Social Inequality
Humanities and Social Sciences > Society > Sociology > Social Structure > Social Inequality

Related Collections

With collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Implementation Research: Strengthening Health Systems

Implementation research serves as a cornerstone in the advancement of evidence-based healthcare. By bridging the gap between scientific evidence and practical implementation, it plays a critical role in translating research findings into effective policies and programs. The real-world application of healthcare interventions often reveals challenges that were not anticipated during the research phase. Thus, understanding the intricacies of program implementation within the broader context of health systems is essential for ensuring the sustainability and scalability of healthcare innovations.

Implementation science goes beyond merely identifying gaps between research and practice; it offers a systematic approach to uncovering unknown barriers and addressing them with feasible, context-specific solutions. This approach not only enhances the effectiveness of healthcare interventions but also contributes to the overall strengthening of health systems. The field holds the potential to inform policy-making, optimize resource allocation, and improve service delivery, particularly in settings where health systems are under-resourced or face unique challenges.

This collection aims to explore the role of implementation research in strengthening health systems, with a particular focus on its ability to bridge the gap between evidence and practice. It seeks to provide a comprehensive overview of how implementation science can be leveraged to address both known and unknown challenges in healthcare delivery. Contributions are invited from scholars who are conducting empirical research, theoretical analyses, or opinion pieces that examine the impact of implementation science on health systems. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to, case studies of successful implementation strategies, evaluations of policy impact, identification of systemic gaps, and the development of innovative solutions tailored to local contexts.

Keywords:Health systems, Implementation research, evidence, health service delivery, health service, health policy

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Oct 27, 2025

Chronic Care and Modern Approaches to Management

This collection is dedicated to advancing our understanding of chronic disease management through the lens of health systems innovation. We invite original research articles and rigorous reviews (systematic, narrative, or scoping) that examine how integrated care models and advanced health service frameworks can transform the management of long-term conditions. Our aim is to highlight research that connects clinical practice with the operational, organizational, and financial structures of health systems.

Submissions should focus on studies that explore and evaluate innovative approaches to care delivery within health systems, highlighting topics such as:

• Integrated Care Models: Investigations into coordinated care strategies that align medical and nursing practices with broader service delivery systems, ensuring seamless transitions between primary, secondary, and community care.

• Organizational Innovations: Evaluations of new management models and care strategies that optimize resource allocation, enhance patient safety, and streamline service delivery within complex health systems.

• Nurse-led and Multidisciplinary Care: Analyses of care strategies led by nursing professionals and multidisciplinary teams, emphasizing their roles in facilitating patient-centered care within structured health service environments.

• Health Economics and Service Sustainability: Economic evaluations and cost-effectiveness analyses of chronic care interventions that inform policy and practice changes within health systems.

• Digital Health and Care Coordination: Studies on the implementation and impact of digital technologies and telemedicine in improving chronic care management, with a focus on enhancing system-wide efficiency and patient outcomes.

• Health System Reforms: Research on policy-driven and organizational reforms aimed at integrating chronic disease management into the broader health services framework, ensuring that care models are both sustainable and scalable.

This collection of articles aims to explore and promote the synergy between clinical excellence and health system innovation, with the goal of highlighting how robust service delivery models can not only optimize clinical outcomes but also enhance patient satisfaction and improve overall quality of life. We are seeking studies that deeply address the operational, financial, and organizational aspects of chronic care within health systems, emphasizing the critical role of a well-structured healthcare system in supporting the treatment and management of chronic diseases.

In particular, we welcome manuscripts that explore innovative approaches to the design and implementation of healthcare services, with a focus on integrated care models, financial sustainability, and organizational efficiency. Our intention is to create a collection that not only contributes to high-quality academic research but also influences healthcare policies globally, providing practical and applicable solutions to address the challenges of international healthcare systems.

Keywords: Chronic disease care, Community Care, nursing care, patient engagement, health economic evaluation

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Dec 21, 2025