Philosophical Foundations of Critical Reflection in the Teaching-Learning Process
Published in Education
Critical reflection in education is not just a classroom technique—it is the culmination of centuries of philosophical thought. The journey from broad life philosophies to focused teaching strategies reveals how ideas about wisdom, democracy, and interpretation have gradually shaped the way teachers and learners engage with knowledge.
Imagine reflective practice as a funnel. At the wide opening, we find philosophers who explored reflection as a way of living wisely and ethically. As the funnel narrows, their insights are distilled into educational theories. Finally, at the narrow end, reflection becomes a practical tool for teachers in the classroom.
Broad Philosophical Foundations
- Aristotle – Practical Wisdom (Phronesis): Reflection begins as ethical judgment in action, helping us balance theory with lived experience.
- Dewey – Reflective Intelligence for Democratic Learning: Reflection becomes inquiry, encouraging learners to think critically and participate in democratic problem-solving.
- Gadamer – Interpretive Judgement: Reflection is dialogue, emphasizing interpretation and meaning-making in professional contexts.
- Habermas – Critical Reflection: Reflection challenges norms and power structures, making learning emancipatory and socially aware.
These thinkers remind us that reflection is not limited to teaching—it is a way of engaging with life itself.
Transition Toward Education
As reflection moves closer to the classroom, it takes on a more pedagogical focus:
- Kolb – Experiential Learning Cycle: Reflection becomes part of a cycle—experience, observation, conceptualization, and experimentation.
- Carr – Teacher-Centered Critical Reflection: Reflection empowers teachers to critique their own practices and the systems they work within.
Here, reflection shifts from philosophy to applied educational theory, guiding how teachers and learners interact with knowledge.
Focused Pedagogical Strategies
At the narrowest end of the funnel, reflection becomes directly actionable in teaching practice:
-
Schön – Reflection-in-Action and On-Action: Teachers reflect during teaching (in-action) and after teaching (on-action), continuously refining their methods.
This is where reflection becomes a critical tool for professional growth, allowing teachers to adapt, critique, and transform their practice in real time. The funnel metaphor shows us that critical reflection in teaching is deeply rooted in philosophy. It is not an isolated skill, but a practice shaped by centuries of thought: From wisdom and ethics (Aristotle) to democracy and inquiry (Dewey), to interpret and critique (Gadamer, Habermas), to learning cycles and professional practice (Kolb, Carr, Schön).
By tracing this lineage, we see that reflection in education is both a philosophical stance and a pedagogical necessity.
Critical reflection in the teaching-learning process is more than looking back on what worked or didn’t. It is about carrying forward the wisdom of philosophers, the insights of educational theorists, and the practical strategies of reflective practitioners. In doing so, teachers not only refine their methods but also honor a tradition that connects life philosophy with classroom pedagogy.
Reference:
Limbu, S. Critical reflection on fostering multidisciplinary competencies and addressing challenges in secondary education. Discov Educ (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-026-01101-z
Follow the Topic
-
Discover Education
An international, peer-reviewed open access journal that publishes original work in all areas of education, serving the community as a broad-scope journal for academic trends and future developments in the field.
Related Collections
With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.
Empowering Education through AI: Opportunities, Challenges and Risk Governance
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reshaping the landscape of education as a double-edged sword. On one hand, it holds great promise for empowering teaching, learning, assessment, and educational management by making them more efficient, accurate, adaptive, and responsive. On the other hand, the increasing integration of AI in education elicits significant pedagogical, ethical, social, and policy concerns, such as reduced learner agency, algorithmic control, academic misconduct, and exacerbated educational disparities. Without proper risk governance, the AI technologies intended to empower education may end up disrupting the educational processes and wreaking chaos on educational development. This calls for coordinated efforts from policymakers, researchers, and practitioners worldwide to ensure the legitimate, appropriate, responsible, and ethical use of AI in education.
Against this backdrop, this Collection aims to promote critical inquiry into the intricate and multifaceted features of AI use in education. We particularly welcome interdisciplinary perspectives that explicate how policymakers, researchers, educators, and learners can participate in and collaborate to leverage the transformative power of AI while mitigating the potential risks within different educational scenarios and across diversified cultural contexts. Potential topics include (but are not limited to):
1. Social, ethical, cognitive, emotional, and behavioural terrains of AI use in education
2. Human-AI collaboration in teaching, learning, assessment, and educational management
3. Learner agency, self-regulation, and AI-empowered learning
4. Teacher professional development in AI-empowered education
5. AI literacy for educators and learners
6. Educational equity and academic integrity in the AI era
7. Policy innovation and risk governance for AI use in various educational settings
8. Cross-cultural perspectives on AI use and governance in education
This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 4
Keywords: Artificial Intelligence (AI); Human-AI collaboration; AI-empowered education; policy innovation; risk governance; educational equity; academic integrity
Publishing Model: Open Access
Deadline: Feb 26, 2026
Empowering Education: Interdisciplinary Convergence and Skill Ecosystem Reconstruction for a Sustainable Future
In an era of unprecedented environmental and societal challenges, education systems must transform to empower students as catalysts for sustainable futures. This Collection advances sustainability education beyond environmental awareness, focusing on developing critical competencies—systems thinking, ethical decision-making, and innovative problem-solving—essential for building resilient societies.
We call for systemic reimagining of education across all levels and disciplines, particularly highlighting:
• Cross-curricular integration of sustainability principles in STEM and vocational training
• Pedagogical innovations that bridge theory-practice gaps
• Industry-education synergies for green skills development
• Digital transformation of sustainability learning
Key Research Domains
Contributions should address critical intersections of sustainability and education, including but not limited to:
• Curriculum innovation for actionable sustainability knowledge
• Evidence-based pedagogical strategies fostering sustainability literacy
• Vocational education redesign for green economy readiness
• Industry partnerships enhancing real-world learning
• Digital technologies (AI, data analytics) in sustainability education
• Assessment frameworks for sustainability competencies
• Teacher professional development models
• Global citizenship and ethical responsibility cultivation
Transformative Objectives
By examining how curricula, teaching strategies, and learning environments can embed sustainability principles, this Special Issue aims to:
• Equip learners with values-driven leadership capabilities
• Develop scalable solutions for environmental, social, and economic challenges
• Catalyze education’s role in achieving global sustainability goals
We invite submissions offering actionable insights and transformative frameworks to prepare students for thriving in a rapidly evolving world.
Publishing Model: Open Access
Deadline: May 31, 2026
Please sign in or register for FREE
If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in