Political economy of administrative responses to informal housing and land tenure security in Sheger City Ethiopia

The rapid urbanisation of Sheger City, Ethiopia, has led to a proliferation of informal housing and a growing struggle for land tenure security among its residents. This research, published in Discover Cities, delves into the political economy of administrative responses to this phenomenon.
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Explore the Research

Springer International Publishing
Springer International Publishing Springer International Publishing

Political economy of administrative responses to informal housing and land tenure security in Sheger City Ethiopia - Discover Cities

In the rapidly expanding urban frontiers of Ethiopia, informal housing is often treated as a technical failure of planning. However, this study argues that informality is a deliberate “logic of governance” mediated by power and capital. The research addresses a significant gap in political economy analysis regarding how demolition and upgrading are weaponized within urban power structures, hypothesizing that informal housing is a structural necessity born of asymmetric power dynamics and land speculation. Central to this analysis is the “Tripartite Alliance” of brokers, farmers, and Technocratic Agents who mediate the “negotiated legality” of settlements. The objective is to investigate the political economy of administrative responses in the newly established Sheger City, Oromia. Adopting a pragmatist philosophy, the study utilized an exploratory sequential mixed-methods design, triangulating quantitative data (n = 384) with 40 in-depth interviews and 5 focus group discussions. Inferential analyses reveal that administrative responses are not neutral; residents with “Brokering Experience” were 3.2 times more likely to avoid demolition (OR = 3.2, p < .01), while lower-income households were disproportionately targeted for eradication (chi2 = 14.32, p < .005). Discriminatory demolition (M = 4.56) was found to be more prevalent than neutral enforcement. Qualitative findings uncover a “Tripartite Alliance” of land brokers, displaced farmers, and municipal agents facilitating a “bargaining cycle” that commodifies tenure security. The study concludes that current reactive measures serve as tools for “accumulation by dispossession.” These findings contribute to the literature by uncovering how urban governance weaponizes land policy, suggesting that a shift toward inclusive, technology-based land management is essential to disrupt speculative informal networks and enhance community resilience.

This research, published in Discover Cities, delves into the political economy of administrative responses to this phenomenon, exploring how power dynamics, vested interests, and historical legacies shape the lives of those living on the margins of the city.

The study reveals that the state’s approach to informal housing is often characterized by a lack of transparency and accountability, leading to arbitrary evictions, forced displacements, and a constant state of insecurity for residents. The research also highlights the role of patronage networks and clientelism in shaping the allocation of land and the provision of services, further marginalizing those who lack access to these networks.

Despite these challenges, the research also documents the resilience and agency of informal housing residents, who engage in various forms of resistance and negotiation to secure their land and improve their living conditions. The study concludes with a call for a more inclusive and rights-based approach to urban planning and land management, one that recognizes the contributions of informal housing residents to the city’s economy and society.

The research was inspired by the author’s personal experiences and observations of the challenges faced by informal housing residents in Sheger City. The author conducted extensive fieldwork, including interviews, focus groups, and participant observations, to gain a deep understanding of the perspectives and experiences of those affected by informal housing and land tenure insecurity.

The research is a significant contribution to the literature on urban studies, political economy, and land tenure. It provides important insights into the challenges and opportunities for achieving sustainable and equitable urban development in Ethiopia and beyond.

Efa Tadesse Debele is a researcher with a focus on urban studies, land tenure, and political economy. Efa Tadesse Debele is also a member of the Springer Nature Research Communities, where Efa Tadesse Debele discusses and discovers new ideas, expands their network, and shares the challenges and successes of their work.

 

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

SDG 11: Sustainable Cities
Research Communities > Community > Sustainability > UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) > SDG 11: Sustainable Cities
Political Economy and Economic Systems
Humanities and Social Sciences > Economics > Political Economy and Economic Systems
Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning
Physical Sciences > Earth and Environmental Sciences > Geography > Human Geography > Urban Geography and Urbanism > Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning

Related Collections

With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Cities, Infrastructure and Health

City infrastructure shapes health and health inequities in myriad interdependent ways: cities are drivers of economic policy and employment; they are sites of excellence, for example, education and healthcare, but also of crime and exploitation. Mobility within and between cities and regions is critical for economic development but is also responsible for air pollution, chronic disease, and road traffic injuries. The voracious demands of urban populations for housing, energy, food, and other resources bind cities to their peri-urban and rural neighbors, and across the world environmentally, economically, and socially. These and other examples shape physical health, mental well-being, safety, and equity.

While infrastructure is defined as the undergirding of society, the costs and benefits of revitalizing old or creating new infrastructure tend to narrowly focus on economics rather than how cities and regions function and grow. The climate crisis is placing massive pressure on existing and new infrastructure to both mitigate and adapt to a newer more volatile world. The COVID-19 pandemic profoundly tested (as will future pandemics) the function and capacity of city infrastructure globally through connecting infrastructure (especially transport but also the flow of finance) and locally where critical infrastructure services and their workforce were both the cause and solution to the spread of the pandemic.

The percentage of the global urban population is growing steadily and by 2050 is expected to reach 68%, meaning scholarship to drive decision-making, politics, and policy is urgent. Taking a health lens to infrastructure provides an ever deeper understanding of the links between cities as producers of healthy societies and a healthy planet. Influencing city infrastructure to protect and promote the health of the public is wholly political, but the research into the systemic policy and practice connections between city infrastructure and the creation of healthy built environments remains underdeveloped.

This Collection invites papers that capture innovations in city infrastructure policies and practices. The innovations can range from ways that information is collected and used, to activities to develop capacity and share knowledge within and between cities, to the interrogation of policy-making and political institutions. Given the ubiquitous interconnected nature of this challenge, we encourage papers with a global south lens. Given city and infrastructure policy and practice is essentially transdisciplinary we encourage papers that span disciplines. We aim for a collection of papers that foster policy innovation by providing a mix of empirical rigour and critical depth.

Keywords:Cities, Infrastructure, Practice, Policy, Health, Equity, Wellbeing, Urban, Planning, Institutions, Governance, Power, Evidence

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Jun 01, 2026

Nature, Policy, and People: Rethinking Environmental Planning for Climate-Smart Urban Futures

As the 21st century progresses, cities face unprecedented pressures from rapid urbanization, climate variability, ecological degradation, and social inequality. These challenges call for integrated and forward-thinking planning approaches that enhance urban resilience while supporting sustainable development goals. In particular, environmental planning has emerged as a critical domain where transformative change can be realized—by reshaping how cities manage land, natural resources, infrastructure, and urban growth in the face of climate uncertainty. This Collection aims to advance scholarly and policy-oriented debate on climate-resilient urban environmental planning, focusing on nature-based solutions (NbS), green and blue infrastructure, ecosystem-based adaptation, and climate-sensitive land-use management. It invites interdisciplinary and comparative contributions from both the Global South and North, with emphasis on context-sensitive innovations, bottom-up adaptation practices, and integrated planning frameworks that prioritize equity, sustainability, and urban ecological health. Key themes include (but are not limited to):

• The design, implementation, and governance of NbS in formal and informal urban areas

• Urban ecosystem services and their role in climate adaptation and risk reduction

• Policy and planning tools for integrating green and blue infrastructure

• Spatial inequality, environmental justice, and access to green amenities

• Circular urbanism and the nexus of land, water, and waste systems

• Participatory planning for urban resilience and transformation

By drawing together research from urban planning, environmental science, climate policy, and spatial governance, this Collection will provide a platform for empirical evidence, theoretical innovation, and policy-relevant insights. Ultimately, it aims to influence how planners, practitioners, and decision-makers conceptualize and implement resilient and ecologically responsive urban futures.

Keywords: Urban Resilience, Nature-based Solutions, Adaptation to Climate Change, Climate Change, Green and Blue Infrastructure, Environmental Change

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Sep 30, 2026