Rate and predictors of loss to follow-up in HIV care in a low-resource setting: analyzing critical risk periods

By identifying when HIV-positive individuals are most at risk of dropping out, healthcare providers can create better strategies to keep more people engaged in their treatment—and ultimately, help reduce the spread of HIV.

Published in Biomedical Research

Rate and predictors of loss to follow-up in HIV care in a low-resource setting: analyzing critical risk periods
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Explore the Research

BioMed Central
BioMed Central BioMed Central

Rate and predictors of loss to follow-up in HIV care in a low-resource setting: analyzing critical risk periods - BMC Infectious Diseases

Background Patient loss-to-follow-up (LTFU) in HIV care is a major challenge, especially in low-resource settings. Although the literature has focused on the total rate at which patients disengage from care, it has not sufficiently examined the specific risk periods during which patients are most likely to disengage from care. By addressing this gap, researchers and healthcare providers can develop more targeted interventions to improve patient engagement in HIV care. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study on newly enrolled adult HIV patients at seven randomly selected high-volume health facilities in Ethiopia from May 2022 to April 2024. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 26, with a focus on the incidence rate of LTFU during the critical risk periods. Cumulative hazard analysis was used to compare event distributions, whereas a Poisson regression model was used to identify factors predicting LTFU, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Results The analysis included 737 individuals newly enrolled in HIV care; 165 participants (22.4%, 95% CI: 19.5–25.2) were LTFU by the end of two years, of which 50.1% occurred within the first 6 months, 29.7% within 7–12 months, and 19.4% from 13 to 24 months on ART. The overall incidence rate of LTFU was 18.3 per 1,000 PMO (95% CI: 15.9–20.6), with rates of 167.7 in the first 6 months, 55.4 in 7–12 months, and 18.1 in 13–24 months. Incomplete addresses lacking a phone number or location information (IRR: 1.61; 95% CI: 1.14, 2.27) and poor adherence (IRR: 1.78; 95% CI: 1.28, 2.48) were factors predicting the incidence rate of LTFU. Conclusion LTFU peaked in the first 6 months, accounting for approximately half of total losses, remained elevated from months 7–12, and stabilized after the first year of HIV care and treatment. Address information and adherence were predictors of LTFU. To effectively minimize LTFU, efforts should focus on intensive support during the first six months of care, followed by sustained efforts and monitoring in the next six months. Our findings highlight a critical period for targeted interventions to reduce LTFU in HIV care.

Why Do Some People Stop HIV Treatment? Understanding the Key Moments

In the global fight against HIV, keeping people engaged in their treatment is crucial. Even though many countries aim to meet ambitious HIV care goals by 2030, a significant challenge remains: helping those who start HIV treatment continue their care and keep their virus under control. A big part of this challenge is what’s known as "loss to follow-up" (LTFU).

What is Loss to Follow-Up (LTFU)?

LTFU happens when someone on HIV treatment misses their medical appointments or stops taking their medication for over 28 days. This is a serious issue, as it can lead to poorer health, increased risk of death, and a higher chance of spreading HIV to others because the virus isn’t being suppressed.

When Do People Stop Treatment?

This study looked at 737 adults who were new to HIV care and identified the times when they were most likely to stop their treatment:

  • The First 6 Months Are Critical: About 50% of the people who dropped out of care did so within the first six months. This early period is a high-risk time, with an LTFU rate nine times higher than later periods (13-24 months). People might face challenges like dealing with side effects, struggling to adjust to a new routine, or not yet seeing the benefits of the medication.
  • 7-12 Months: A Continued Risk: Even though the risk of dropping out decreases after the first six months, many people still struggle to stick with their treatment during months 7-12. About 30% of those who stopped care did so during this time. Factors like financial difficulties, stigma, or transportation issues can continue to affect them.
  • After 12 Months: A More Stable Phase: After a year on treatment, the dropout rate drops significantly. By this time, many patients have adjusted to their routine, seen improvements in their health, and are more committed to their treatment.

What Can We Do About It?

The findings suggest that the first six months of HIV treatment are a make-or-break time. Health programs should focus on providing extra support during this period, such as helping patients manage side effects and offering counseling. Continued support is also important in the following months to help people overcome challenges that might come up later.

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

HIV infections
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Biomedical Research > Pathogenesis > Infection > Infectious Diseases > HIV infections

Related Collections

With collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Urinary tract infections

BMC Infectious Diseases is calling for submissions to our Collection on Urinary tract infections. Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most common bacterial infections encountered in clinical practice, affecting hundreds of millions of individuals worldwide each year. In addition to being highly prevalent, UTIs present ongoing challenges due to their recurrent nature and the rise of antibiotic-resistant pathogens. This Collection seeks to address these challenges by highlighting advancements in our understanding and management of UTIs.

We invite submissions that explore a wide array of topics within the scope of UTIs, including but not limited to:

-Pathogenesis and microbiology: investigations into the molecular mechanisms of Uropathogenic Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus saprophyticus, Klebsiella spp., Pseudomonas spp., Candida albicans, Enterococcus spp., and Staphylococcus aureus

-Clinical manifestations and complications: research on various clinical presentations of UTIs, including acute cystitis, catheter-associated urinary tract infection, and pyelonephritis

-Diagnostic innovations: advances in urinalysis techniques and novel diagnostic biomarkers that improve the accuracy and speed of UTI diagnosis

-Treatment and resistance: insights into current and emerging therapies for UTIs (including antimicrobial treatments and their efficacy against resistant strains), and research on alternative therapeutic approaches (such as bacteriophage therapy, probiotics, and immunomodulatory treatments)

-Epidemiology and prevention: studies examining the epidemiological trends of UTIs in various populations, risk factors for infection, and strategies for prevention

This Collection aims to provide a platform for sharing knowledge and fostering collaboration among researchers, clinicians, and healthcare professionals. By addressing the multifaceted nature of UTIs, we hope to contribute to the development of more effective strategies for their management and prevention. This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3: Good Health & Well-Being.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Aug 26, 2025

Healthcare-associated infections

BMC Infectious Diseases is calling for submissions to our Collection on Healthcare-associated infections.

Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) represent a significant challenge to patient safety and public health, affecting millions of patients worldwide each year. These infections, which can occur in various healthcare settings, including hospitals and long-term care facilities, encompass a range of conditions such as surgical site infections, catheter-associated infections, and ventilator-associated infections. The emergence of antibiotic-resistant pathogens has further complicated the landscape of HAIs, necessitating ongoing research and innovation in infection prevention and control strategies.

Advancing our collective understanding of healthcare-associated infections is crucial for developing effective interventions that can reduce their incidence and improve patient outcomes. Recent advances in this field include the implementation of improved infection control protocols, the use of advanced surveillance technologies, and the development of novel antimicrobial agents. These efforts have shown promise in mitigating the impact of HAIs, but continued research is essential to address the evolving challenges posed by emerging pathogens and to refine existing strategies.

Ongoing research in healthcare-associated infections may lead to advancements in personalized infection prevention strategies, improved diagnostic tools, and the integration of artificial intelligence in infection surveillance. Such innovations could significantly boost our ability to predict, prevent, and manage HAIs, ultimately leading to safer healthcare environments.

This Collection aims to enhance understanding and improve practices in healthcare-associated infections management. Key topics of interest for submission include, but are not limited to:

Strategies for preventing surgical site infections

Trends in catheter-associated infections

Impact of antibiotic resistance on nosocomial infections

Innovations in infection control practices

Surveillance methods for healthcare-associated infections

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3: Good Health & Well-Being.

All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Oct 31, 2025