The use of positive deviance approach to improve health service delivery and quality of care: a scoping review

The positive deviance approach has gained traction within healthcare organizations, yet there remains a scarcity of comprehensive guidance, resulting in the utilization of disparate methods of varying quality.

Published in Healthcare & Nursing

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Explore the Research

SpringerLink
SpringerLink SpringerLink

The use of positive deviance approach to improve health service delivery and quality of care: a scoping review - BMC Health Services Research

Background Quality has been a persistent challenge in the healthcare system, particularly in resource-limited settings. As a result, the utilization of innovative approaches is required to help countries in their efforts to enhance the quality of healthcare. The positive deviance (PD) approach is an innovative approach that can be utilized to improve healthcare quality. The approach assumes that solutions to problems are already available within the community and identifying and sharing those solutions can help others to resolve existing issues. Therefore, this scoping review aimed to synthesize the evidence regarding the use of the PD approach in healthcare system service delivery and quality improvement programs. Methods Articles were retrieved from six international databases. The last date for article search was June 02, 2023, and no date restriction was applied. All articles were assessed for inclusion through a title and/or abstract read. Then, articles that passed the title and abstract review were screened by reading their full texts. In case of duplication, only the full-text published articles were retained. A descriptive mapping and evidence synthesis was done to present data with the guide of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis extension for Scoping Reviews checklist and the results are presented in text, table, and figure formats. Results A total of 125 articles were included in this scoping review. More than half, 66 (52.8%), of the articles were from the United States, 11(8.8%) from multinational studies, 10 (8%) from Canada, 8 (6.4%) from the United Kingdom and the remaining, 30 (24%) are from other nations around the world. The scoping review indicates that several types of study designs can be applied in utilizing the PD approach for healthcare service and quality improvement programs. However, although validated performance measures are utilized to identify positive deviants (PDs) in many of the articles, some of the selection criteria utilized by authors lack clarity and are subject to potential bias. In addition, several limitations have been mentioned in the articles including issues in operationalizing PD, focus on leaders and senior managers and limited staff involvement, bias, lack of comparison, limited setting, and issues in generalizability/transferability of results from prospects perspective. Nevertheless, the limitations identified are potentially manageable and can be contextually resolved depending on the nature of the study. Furthermore, PD has been successfully employed in healthcare service and quality improvement programs including in increasing surgical care quality, hand hygiene practice, and reducing healthcare-associated infections. Conclusion The scoping review findings have indicated that healthcare systems have been able to enhance quality, reduce errors, and improve patient outcomes by identifying lessons from those who exhibit exceptional practices and implementing successful strategies in their practice. All the outcomes of PD-based research, however, are dependent on the first step of identifying true PDs. Hence, it is critical that PDs are identified using objective and validated measures of performance as failure to identify true PDs can subsequently lead to failure in identifying best practices for learning and dissemination to other contextually similar settings.

Healthcare systems worldwide are faced with a myriad of challenges in enhancing accessibility and delivering top-notch healthcare services on a global scale. These hurdles encompass deficiencies in data collection and monitoring systems, subpar organizational team culture and limited capacity, ineffective leadership, a lack of incentivization for outstanding performance, and a scarcity of evidence-based health policies to bolster implementation and enhance the proficiency of healthcare professionals. Consequently, there is an increasing imperative to explore and adopt innovative approaches to enhance and provide safe, effective, and high-quality healthcare services within the healthcare system.

The positive deviance approach emerges as an innovative strategy aimed at identifying exemplary practices existing within a given community. This community, within the healthcare context, encompasses various entities including teams, groups, departments, and organizations. For example, regional/provincial, zonal, and district-based administrative health offices, local health facilities, and their respective units can be considered as departments and organizations within this community. Notably, social service agencies, healthcare organization representatives, and local government bodies have been regarded as integral components of communities in studies employing the positive deviance approach to understand collaboration among social service and healthcare providers in communities achieving relatively low levels of healthcare utilization and expenses among senior citizens.

This approach acknowledges the intrinsic value of existing expertise and operates under the premise that solutions to problems already exist within the community. By identifying and disseminating these solutions, others can effectively address existing complex and intractable challenges. It further underscores that despite facing similar resource constraints, there are individuals who excel in their performance within organizations, and when given the opportunity, these positive deviants are eager to share their experiences, particularly when leaders facilitate the process.

Follow the Topic

Health Care
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Health Care

Related Collections

With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Promise, perception, and practice: workforce capability and technology integration in healthcare

BMC Health Services Research invites submissions on how health workforce professionals interact with, adopt, and shape the implementation of digital health technologies, artificial intelligence (AI), and modern electronic health record (EHR) systems. Whether these technologies deliver value depends not only on the technical specifications but also on how they are implemented, governed, evaluated, and continuously refined within the organizations and workforces in which they operate. Health systems worldwide are committing to technology portfolios at a pace that consistently outstrips the evidence base needed to guide them, leaving technology program leaders without the knowledge they need to make sound investment and deployment decisions. We particularly welcome work that bridges implementation science, clinical informatics, and health services research to generate evidence actionable for health systems managing growing technology portfolios.

Topics of interest include, but are not limited to:

  • Adoption and sustained use: digital literacy, training, and effective human–AI collaboration
  • Front-line feedback as a signal for monitoring and improving technology performance
  • Case studies of AI tools (clinical systems, ambient documentation, EHRs, decision support) with focus on long-term value and sustainment
  • Governance, evaluation frameworks, and learning health system models for continuous assessment
  • Impacts on care quality, clinician well-being, efficiency, and costs, including unintended effects (e.g., workflow disruption, alert fatigue)
  • Ethical, equity, and policy considerations, including evolving AI governance
  • Innovative measurement using EHR logs, administrative data, and observational methods
  • Development of standardized evaluation frameworks applicable across technologies and settings

We welcome submissions across all article types accepted by BMC Health Services Research, including research articles, systematic reviews, study protocols, database and software articles.

All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Jan 29, 2027

Strengthening health system resilience: from emergency preparedness to response and recovery

Health systems worldwide are increasingly facing the dual challenges of rising health demands and the unpredictability of emergencies. Recent and ongoing polycrises—whether the COVID-19 pandemic, sporadic outbreaks of emerging or reemerging diseases, or increasingly frequent emergencies resulting from natural hazards—have highlighted the urgent and compelling need for enhanced health system preparedness and resilience. Effective emergency preparedness involves not only robust planning and response strategies but also the capability to adapt and recover quickly from disruptions. This Collection aims to explore the multifaceted aspects of strengthening health systems to ensure they can effectively prepare for, respond to, and recover from emergencies and maintain continuity of care.

Addressing the resilience of health systems is crucial for safeguarding public health and ensuring that healthcare providers can deliver effective services during crises. Recent advancements have included the integration of technology in health management, improved supply chain logistics, and enhanced workforce training. Furthermore, frameworks for assessing health system resilience have been developed, offering valuable insights into best practices. However, ongoing research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of these strategies and to implement innovative solutions that can be adapted to various contexts and crises.

Topics for submission but are not limited to:

  • Governance, leadership, and policy approaches for resilient health systems
  • Frameworks and metrics for assessing and strengthening health system preparedness and resilience
  • Financing mechanisms and economic resilience of health systems in emergencies
  • Community engagement and locally led strategies in crisis preparedness, response and recovery
  • Workforce training, surge capacity, and capability building for emergency response
  • Supply chain management and essential resource security during emergencies
  • Digital technologies and data-driven innovations for emergency preparedness, response and recovery
  • Health system resilience in underserved, vulnerable, or fragile settings

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being.

All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Mar 19, 2027