What Brazilian hospitals taught me about resilience under pressure
Published in Public Health, Education, and Business & Management
Several studies have associated emergency department overcrowding, operational fragmentation, and staff overload with patient safety risks, delayed care, communication failures, and burnout in healthcare systems worldwide. Discussions in quality improvement, resilience engineering, and healthcare operations research have increasingly reinforced the importance of governance structures, operational coordination, and organizational resilience in highly pressured environments.
Over the last few years, I have participated in projects involving Lean Healthcare, organizational maturity assessment, clinical governance, and emergency department overcrowding analysis in Brazilian hospitals.
These experiences — combined with operational work in intensive care units, emergency departments, and healthcare leadership — reinforced an important perception:
Resilience in healthcare systems is often misunderstood.
In many organizations, resilience becomes associated with the ability of professionals to continue operating despite chronic overload. However, operational experience and quality improvement initiatives increasingly demonstrate that sustainable healthcare systems cannot depend indefinitely on extraordinary individual effort alone.
Eventually, even highly committed teams become vulnerable when governance structures, operational visibility, communication flows, and decision-making processes become fragile.
In projects related to operational flow and organizational maturity, it became clear that resilient systems are characterized not only by technical competence, but by their ability to maintain coordination under pressure.
This includes:
- reliable operational data;
- governance structures capable of supporting decision-making;
- communication alignment between teams;
- organizational trust;
- and operational models capable of functioning even during periods of saturation.
Many healthcare crises are not necessarily generated by lack of technical knowledge.
They emerge from fragmentation.
Fragmented communication.
Fragmented accountability.
Fragmented operational visibility.
Fragmented priorities.
Under pressure, fragmented systems collapse faster.
At the same time, I have also witnessed remarkable operational recoveries in hospitals capable of reorganizing flow, rebuilding governance mechanisms, and restoring alignment between teams even in highly constrained environments.
These experiences significantly changed the way I understand healthcare leadership and operational resilience.
Resilience is not the absence of pressure.
It is the capacity of the system to continue functioning safely, coherently, and predictably despite pressure.
And perhaps that is one of the most important lessons Brazilian hospitals have taught me.
References
- To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System
- Resilient Health Care
- The association between emergency department crowding and adverse patient outcomes: a systematic review
- Burnout in healthcare professionals: a call for organizational action
- Goodhart’s Law and healthcare performance measurement
Follow the Topic
-
BMC Global and Public Health
An open access, transparent peer review journal publishing outstanding and influential research and opinion of broad interest to all professional communities involved in global and public health research, policy-making, implementation and delivery worldwide.
Related Collections
With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.
Advanced data-driven analytical frameworks to support and improve policy decisions
BMC Global and Public Health is calling for submissions to our Collection on how the integration of advanced data-driven methods in public health policy is rapidly transforming how we understand and respond to global health challenges. This Collection focuses on the application of innovative statistical modelling, machine learning, and geographic information systems (GIS) to inform health policy decisions. By integrating data from surveys and health records with information on social and environmental determinants, researchers can uncover actionable insights that enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of health interventions across diverse populations.
The relevance of these advanced methodologies is underscored by recent advancements in methods for data collection and analysis, which have enabled researchers to create more precise models for predicting disease outbreaks, evaluating health interventions, and addressing health disparities. As public health continues to confront complex issues such as pandemics and non-communicable diseases, the ability to leverage data-driven strategies becomes increasingly vital for crafting evidence-based policies that are responsive to real-world challenges.
Continued research in this area could lead to groundbreaking methodologies that enhance our understanding of health dynamics and improve public health responses. Future advancements may include the development of real-time data analytics for tracking disease spread, enhanced spatial epidemiological models that account for environmental variables, and improved collaboration between data scientists and public health professionals. By further integrating data science with public health, we can pave the way for more effective interventions and ultimately improve health outcomes globally.
We encourage submissions in the following areas, with a particular interest in studies relevant to low- and middle-income countries (LMICs); however, contributions from all settings are welcome, including:
- Applications of Machine Learning in Public Health
- Spatial Epidemiology and Disease Mapping
- Statistical Modeling for Health Policy Decisions
- GIS in Public Health Decision Making
- Evidence-Based Approaches to Infectious and Non-communicable Diseases
This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being.
All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer-review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.
Publishing Model: Open Access
Deadline: Nov 14, 2026
Climate change and human health: Unpacking connections, advancing solutions
BMC Global and Public Health is calling for submissions to our Collection on the intersection of climate change and global and public health. This Collection seeks to unpack the profound impacts of climate change on population health, health equity, and health systems – and the solutions needed to protect health, reduce inequities, and enhance health system resilience.
We welcome papers covering diverse geographies and populations (especially marginalized groups), climate hazards and risks (both direct and indirect), diseases and health outcomes (including physical and mental health), and health system areas. Submitted papers may fall under the following sub-themes:
1. Climate and Health Pathways and Mechanisms
How climate change affects population health, health equity, and health systems – with a focus on the pathways and mechanisms, the wide range of upstream drivers (ex. ecosystem change) and downstream determinants (ex. social conditions) involved, and existing and emerging solutions to address them
2. Climate Justice and Health Equity
How climate change worsens existing health inequities and impacts marginalized communities – and the range of solutions – from the community to the policy level – required to achieve climate justice and health equity
3. Data for Climate and Health: Challenges and Innovations
What data gaps and challenges are faced in climate and health research and action – and the emerging methodological, technological, and governance innovations for overcoming them to inform policies and societal responses
4. Interventions for Climate Change and Health
What are the emerging interventions – ex. clinical, technological, community-based, institutional – for climate-health problems – at micro, meso, and macro levels – and evidence of effectiveness, lessons learned from their implementation, and prospects for sustainability and scale up
This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3: Good Health and Well-Being and SDG 13: Climate Action.
We encourage work from local, regional, national, and global partnerships and collaboration among multidisciplinary scientists using multiple methodologies. We ask that authors be careful to use non-stigmatizing/preferred language in their manuscripts as outlined in relevant language guidelines for their respective fields.
All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer-review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.
Publishing Model: Open Access
Deadline: Nov 13, 2026
Please sign in or register for FREE
If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in