Why School Based Dengue Education Matters

Why School Based Dengue Education Matters
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Explore the Research

BioMed Central
BioMed Central BioMed Central

School based health education as an underutilized strategy for dengue prevention - Discover Public Health

Dengue is a rapidly expanding mosquito-borne viral disease and a recognized neglected tropical disease (NTD) with substantial population health impacts in tropical and subtropical regions worldwide. Despite sustained investments in vector control, dengue incidence has increased markedly over the past two decades, highlighting persistent gaps in prevention strategies—particularly among children and adolescents, who bear a disproportionate burden of infection. Schools represent an underleveraged but strategically important setting for dengue prevention, offering sustained access to young populations and opportunities to reinforce preventive behaviors within households and communities. This perspective article synthesizes evidence from multiple geographic contexts suggesting that school-based dengue health education improves knowledge, and to a more variable extent, attitudes, and preventive practices among students and, in some cases, their families and communities. However, these interventions are often short-term and peripheral within national dengue and NTD control frameworks. We propose a stepwise integration framework for embedding education within national strategies, complementing vector control and surveillance efforts, and advancing equity and health system resilience. Key implementation gaps include limited policy integration, variable program standardization, and insufficient linkage to long-term surveillance or community interventions. Strengthening dengue education among children may represent a scalable and sustainable opportunity to reduce NTD burden and improve population health outcomes in alignment with Sustainable Development Goal 3.

This paper started with a simple question: why do we keep seeing dengue cases rise, even when we know how to prevent them?

So much of dengue control still centers on vector control, including spraying, surveillance, and emergency response. These approaches are essential, but they often come into play after risk is already elevated. What felt less explored, at least in a sustained and systematic way, was the role of education, especially among children.

As I began reviewing the literature, a pattern became clear. School based dengue education consistently improves knowledge. But when it comes to changing behaviors, the evidence is more mixed. That is not a failure of education. It is a reminder that behavior does not exist in isolation. Students may understand how dengue spreads, but they do not always have control over their environments, particularly when breeding sites exist at the household or community level.

That insight shifted the focus of the paper. Instead of asking whether education works, the more useful question became how education should be positioned within broader dengue control strategies. In the paper, I explore how school based approaches can be better integrated into existing dengue prevention efforts.

What emerged is the idea that education should not be treated as a short term or stand alone intervention. Schools are one of the few settings where sustained, structured engagement is possible. They connect students, families, and communities. When aligned with vector control and surveillance, education can reinforce prevention in a way that is continuous rather than reactive.

This paper is ultimately an argument for integration. Not replacing existing strategies, but strengthening them by embedding education more intentionally within national dengue and public health frameworks.

At its core, this work points to a broader shift in how we think about prevention. Lasting progress will depend not only on responding to outbreaks, but on building systems that support informed, everyday practices across communities.

Follow the Topic

Public Health
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Public Health
Health Promotion and Disease Prevention
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Public Health > Health Promotion and Disease Prevention
Dengue virus
Life Sciences > Biological Sciences > Microbiology > Virology > Dengue virus
Global Health
Humanities and Social Sciences > Society > Sociology > Health, Medicine and Society > Global Health
Infectious Diseases
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Biomedical Research > Pathogenesis > Infection > Infectious Diseases

Related Collections

With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

The Economics of Longevity: Health Expenditure and Societal Implications for Public Health Systems

The relationship between health investment and life expectancy has long been a focal point in public health research and policy. As nations grapple with rising healthcare costs and varying health outcomes, understanding how financial allocations influence population health becomes increasingly critical. Numerous studies have illustrated that increased spending on health services often correlates with improvements in life expectancy; however, the complexities of this relationship are not fully understood. Factors such as socioeconomic status, healthcare accessibility, and the efficiency of health systems play significant roles in determining how investments translate into health outcomes.

At the national level, health investments primarily encompass government expenditure on healthcare systems, public health initiatives, and health infrastructure. Nations that allocate substantial resources toward healthcare often experience better health outcomes and increased life expectancy among their populations. For instance, countries with robust healthcare funding tend to provide more comprehensive services, including preventive care, chronic disease management, and health promotion programs, all of which contribute to enhanced population health. However, it is crucial to consider how these investments are distributed across different segments of the population. Inequities in health spending can exacerbate existing disparities, leading to significant differences in life expectancy among various demographic groups. Effective health investment strategies must address these disparities to ensure that improvements in life expectancy are equitable and inclusive.

The motivation for this Collection arises from the urgent need to bridge the gap between health expenditures and tangible improvements in life expectancy. Recent global health crises and ongoing disparities in health outcomes across different populations have underscored the necessity for a deeper exploration of how resource allocation affects health dynamics. This Collection seeks to provide a platform for researchers and practitioners to discuss empirical evidence, theoretical frameworks, and innovative approaches to understanding these critical interactions. By fostering dialogue around effective health investment strategies, we aim to contribute to the development of more equitable and efficient health systems worldwide.

The purpose of this Collection is to gather comprehensive research that elucidates the dynamics between health investment and life expectancy across diverse contexts. We welcome contributions that analyze historical trends, comparative studies, and policy evaluations, as well as those that explore the implications of financial investments on health equity. By highlighting interdisciplinary perspectives and fostering collaboration, this Collection aspires to advance the discourse on optimizing health investments for improved population health outcomes.

Topics of interest include, but are not limited to:

- Economic evaluations of health interventions

- Policy impacts on health spending and life expectancy

- Health equity and investment disparities

- Longitudinal studies on health expenditures and population health

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3.

Keywords: health expenditure; healthcare economics; life expectancy; economic evaluation; population health; health investment; health policy

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Dec 31, 2026

Digital Frontiers in Public Health: Data-driven Solutions and Technologies for Efficiency, Effectiveness, and Equity

In recent years, the landscape of public health has been transformed by unprecedented access to high-quality data, advances in data storage and processing, and a growing willingness to share information across jurisdictions. The global response to the COVID-19 pandemic exemplified how coordinated data use and technological innovation can accelerate decision-making, enhance surveillance, and save lives. These developments mark a new era in which the application of modern data analytics in evidence-driven public health practices is not only possible but essential.

Building on this momentum, contemporary innovations are contributing to significant improvements in the three Es of public health: efficiency, effectiveness, and equity. Improved efficiency enables resources to be allocated and managed in a manner that generates the maximum attainable outputs; enhanced effectiveness ensures that public health policies, interventions, and practices achieve the expected health outcomes; and strengthened equity promotes fair access to healthcare and public health services across all populations. Together, these dimensions reflect the evolving priorities and capabilities of modern public health systems.

This Collection, “Digital Frontiers in Public Health: Data-driven Solutions and Technologies for Efficiency, Effectiveness, and Equity,” invites contributions that explore these themes through empirical studies, methodological advancements, case studies, and policy analyses. We seek manuscripts that highlight innovative data applications, cross-sector collaborations, digital health initiatives, and strategies that enhance equity through technology and data integration, as well as collaborative public health practices.

Topics of interest include, but are not limited to:

- Applications of novel data linkage and analytics methods in public health

- The role of participation and co-creation in addressing public health issues

- Digital and technological innovations in public health

- Complete or partial assessments of triple Es in public health

- Economic evaluations of public health interventions

By showcasing diverse approaches from around the world, this Collection aims to provide a comprehensive overview of how data-driven innovations are reshaping public health practice today, and in the future. Researchers, practitioners, and policymakers are encouraged to share their insights and experiences to contribute to this critical dialogue on the future of public health.

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3.

Keywords: digital applications; data sharing; data infrastructure; economic evaluations; health equity; public health; policy analysis; health informatics

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Sep 30, 2026