YWHAE-NUTM2 oncoprotein regulates proliferation and cyclin D1 in endometrial stromal sarcoma via RAF/MAPK and Hippo pathways
Published in Cancer
Endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) is the second most common subtype of uterine mesenchymal cancer, after leiomyosarcoma. ESSs comprise several clinicopathological entities, including endometrial stromal nodules, low-grade ESS (LG-ESS), high-grade ESS (HG-ESS), and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma.
We previously identified translocation t(10;17)(q22;p13) as the mechanism of YWHAE-NUTM2 fusion in HG-ESS and we further showed the t(10;17) resulted in two alternative oncogenic fusions, which had been previously indistinguishable based on conventional chromosomal banding studies. These alternative oncogenic events fuse YWHAE to either of two closely related novel proteins, NUTM2A or NUTM2B, both of which are encoded by genes in 10q22. This is the first example of a recurrent oncogenic rearrangement involving a 14-3-3 protein in cancer and the same fusion was subsequently demonstrated in a subset of pediatric renal sarcomas. Notably, the YWHAE-NUTM2 fusions are diagnostically specific for HG-ESS, among uterine sarcomas, and are associated with cyclin D1 upregulation. HG-ESS with YWHAE-NUTM2 fusion have strong nuclear cyclin D1 expression, which is found rarely – if at all – in other subtypes of ESS, and is likewise uncommon in other gynecologic sarcomas that can enter the differential diagnosis of HG-ESS, such as leiomyosarcoma. Therefore, both YWHAE-NUTM2 fusion and cyclin D1 expression have proven useful as diagnostic immunomarkers for clinically-aggressive ESS. However, the mechanisms by which YWHAE-NUTM2 causes cyclin D1 overexpression and HG-ESS oncogenesis have not been characterized.
In the current studies, we show YWHAE-NUTM2 complexes with both BRAF/RAF1 and YAP/TAZ in HG-ESS. These interactions are functionally relevant because YWHAE-NUTM2 knockdown in HG-ESS inhibits RAF/MEK/MAPK phosphorylation, Hippo/YAP signaling effector (CTGF and CYR61) and cyclin D1 expression, and cell proliferation. Further, cyclin D1 knockdown in HG-ESS dephosphorylates RB1 and inhibits proliferation. In keeping with these findings, we show that MEK and CDK4/6 inhibitors have anti-proliferative effects in HG-ESS, and combinations of these inhibitors have synergistic activity. These findings establish that YWHAE-NUTM2 regulates cyclin D1 expression and cell proliferation by dysregulating RAF/MEK/MAPK and Hippo/YAP-TAZ signaling pathways. Recent studies demonstrate Hippo/YAP-TAZ pathway aberrations in many sarcomas, but this is among the first studies to demonstrate a well-defined oncogenic mechanism as the cause of Hippo pathway dysregulation.
In sum, our findings provide the first insights into YWHAE-NUTM2 oncogenic mechanisms and intriguingly show that YWHAE-NUTM2 dysregulates both RAF1/BRAF and the Hippo pathway to cause overexpression of cyclin D1. These advances also identify the RAF/MEK/MAPK and Hippo pathways, and CDK4/6, as rational targets for evaluation of therapeutic strategies in HG-ESS with YWHAE-NUTM2 fusions. The advances reported herein identify new rationales for targeted therapies in these clinically challenging cancers.
Follow the Topic
-
Oncogenesis
A peer-reviewed open access online journal that publishes articles exploring mechanistic insight and molecular basis of cancer and related phenomena. It seeks to promote diverse and integrated areas of molecular biology, cell biology, oncology, and genetics.
Related Collections
With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.
Metabolic Reprogramming in Cancer
The field of cancer metabolism has expanded rapidly, revealing how metabolic reprogramming drives tumour progression, therapy resistance, and cellular adaptation. Beyond local interactions, accumulating evidence shows that circulating immune cells and blood‑borne factors—including metabolites, cytokines, and extracellular vesicles—actively influence tumour metabolic states. These systemic signals interact with tumour‑resident cells to shape metabolic plasticity, modulate survival pathways, and affect treatment responses.
Within the tumour microenvironment itself, metabolic interplay between cancer cells, immune cells, and stromal components remains a central determinant of tumour behaviour. Altered glycolytic flux, lactate‑driven microenvironmental changes, and cancer stem cell–associated metabolic adaptations contribute to tumour aggressiveness, immune evasion, and resistance mechanisms. Together, these local and systemic dimensions provide an integrated view of how metabolism underpins cancer progression.
This collection supports United Nations SDG 3: Good Health & Well-Being.
Topics of interest include:
- metabolic interactions within the tumour microenvironment
- cancer stem cell metabolism
- glycolytic pathways in tumour promotion
- tumour–immune cell metabolic interplay (local and systemic)
- interplay between circulating blood cells and tumour metabolism
- drug resistance and metabolic shifts
- protein expression in metabolic reprogramming
- role of transcription factors in metabolism
- signal transduction pathways affecting cancer metabolism
Publishing Model: Open Access
Deadline: Dec 31, 2026
Please sign in or register for FREE
If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in