Beyond Isolated Optimization: A Holistic Review Across the Pre‑Mid Post‑Treatment Chain for Hard Carbon in Sodium‑Ion Battery

Published in Materials

Beyond Isolated Optimization: A Holistic Review Across the Pre‑Mid Post‑Treatment Chain for Hard Carbon in Sodium‑Ion Battery
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Explore the Research

Springer Nature Singapore
Springer Nature Singapore Springer Nature Singapore

Beyond Isolated Optimization: A Holistic Review Across the Pre-Mid Post-Treatment Chain for Hard Carbon in Sodium-Ion Battery - Nano-Micro Letters

Commercialization of sodium-ion batteries depends on the advancement of high-performance hard carbon (HC) anodes. Their complex microstructure, composed of graphitic nanodomains, nanopores, and defects, fundamentally governs sodium storage. However, most design of HC is hampered by a fragmented research approach focusing on single-point optimization. Isolated improvements in the precursor selection, pyrolysis, or post-treatment often produce unsatisfactory results due to overlooked synergistic effects across the entire fabrication chain. This review addresses this challenge by proposing a holistic, full-process engineering perspective. We first clarify how the core structural features of HC collectively determine the storage mechanism. We then systematically examine the roles of pretreatment, mid-process control, and post-treatment in microstructural manipulation. We also critically assess and comparatively evaluate these strategies by identifying their respective strengths, shortcomings, and interdependencies. Our analysis emphasizes that treatments at one stage precondition outcomes at another, highlighting key coupling points for synergistic optimization. How to coordinate these strategies in industrial production to obtain batch performance stable HC has also been discussed. Finally, we put forward future research directions, focusing on establishing quantitative microstructure–property relationships through advanced characterization and modeling, developing cross-stage co-design strategies, and evaluating process scalability and sustainability. This review aims to guide the transition of HC anode development from exploratory confusion toward rational, predictive engineering.

As the global energy transition accelerates, sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) are emerging as a compelling alternative to lithium-ion systems, offering superior low-temperature performance, enhanced safety, and faster charging at a fraction of the cost. Yet, the commercialization bottleneck remains locked in the anode—specifically, hard carbon (HC), the only commercially viable anode material for SIBs today. Now, researchers from Qilu University of Technology, Henan University, City University of Hong Kong, and Wuhan University of Science and Technology, led by Professor Qingwei Li, Professor Jiwei Zhang, and Professor Paul K. Chu, have delivered a landmark review that redefines how we engineer HC from the ground up.

Why This Review Matters

Traditional HC research has long been trapped in a fragmented paradigm—optimizing precursors, pyrolysis, or post-treatment in isolation. These single-point improvements often yield disappointing results because they ignore the intricate synergies and trade-offs across the entire fabrication chain. This work shatters that paradigm by proposing a holistic "Pre-Mid-Post" full-process engineering framework, treating HC development as a systematically coordinated chain rather than a collection of disconnected steps.

Innovative Framework and Mechanism

The review first decodes the "house-of-cards" microstructure of HC—randomly oriented graphitic nanodomains, nanopores, and defects—and clarifies how these four core structural features collectively govern sodium storage. It then systematically dissects each stage of the fabrication chain:

Pretreatment Engineering: From hydrothermal crosslinking and chemical crosslinking to pre-oxidation, pre-carbonization, pre-doping, component regulation, and pore-forming treatments. Each strategy is evaluated for its capacity to modulate graphitic domain growth, pore topology evolution, and defect engineering at the precursor stage.

Mid-Pyrolysis Control: The review critically compares conventional slow heating carbonization with next-generation technologies including flash Joule heating (FJH) and microwave-induced heating. Notably, FJH enables millisecond-scale carbonization that suppresses excessive graphitization while preserving expanded interlayer spacing—yielding HC with plateau capacities up to 290 mAh g-1 and energy savings of ~80%.

Post-Treatment Modification: Surface functional group regulation, post-doping, pore filling, surface coating, and pre-sodiation are analyzed as precision "pruning" tools to refine the preformed carbon framework. For instance, fluorine grafting via "grafting technology" achieves ICE up to 90.0% and stable cycling over 5,000 cycles at 2.0 A g-1.

Outstanding Synergies and Trade-offs

The review's analytical depth lies in exposing the dynamic contradictions within HC microstructures: expanded interlayer spacing boosts ion transport but may compromise electronic conductivity; abundant closed pores enhance plateau capacity but require careful control of open-to-closed pore ratios; defects provide active sites yet exacerbate irreversible SEI formation. The authors demonstrate that only cross-stage co-optimization—where pretreatment preconditions mid-pyrolysis outcomes, which in turn dictate post-treatment efficacy—can resolve these antagonistic effects.

Industrial Relevance and Future Outlook

Drawing from commercial benchmarks including Kuraray, ShengQuan Group, and BSG New Energy, the review addresses the critical gap between laboratory innovation and industrial mass production. It emphasizes raw material consistency control, continuous rotary kiln/roller furnace engineering, and batch-to-batch stability as prerequisites for scaling.

Looking forward, the authors chart six strategic directions: (1) establishing multi-scale quantitative structure–performance relationships via advanced characterization and machine learning; (2) developing cross-stage synergistic modification strategies; (3) promoting interdisciplinary integration of computational simulation and in situ characterization; (4) resolving engineering bottlenecks in large-scale fabrication; (5) standardizing precursor physicochemical information disclosure; and (6) harnessing machine learning to accelerate R&D cycles.

Stay tuned for more groundbreaking insights from this collaborative team across Qilu University of Technology, Henan University, City University of Hong Kong, and Wuhan University of Science and Technology!

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Batteries
Physical Sciences > Materials Science > Materials for Energy and Catalysis > Batteries
Materials for Energy and Catalysis
Physical Sciences > Materials Science > Materials for Energy and Catalysis
Nanotechnology
Physical Sciences > Materials Science > Nanotechnology
  • Nano-Micro Letters Nano-Micro Letters

    Nano-Micro Letters is a peer-reviewed, international, interdisciplinary and open-access journal that focus on science, experiments, engineering, technologies and applications of nano- or microscale structure and system in physics, chemistry, biology, material science, and pharmacy.