Can AI-Supported Digital Microscopy Bridge the Diagnostic Gap in Primary Health Care?

A scoping review published in JMIR examined AI-supported digital microscopy at the primary healthcare level. The study finds that AI systems often achieve diagnostic performance comparable to expert manual microscopy across a range of sample types and show promise in expanding access to diagnostics.
Can AI-Supported Digital Microscopy Bridge the Diagnostic Gap in Primary Health Care?
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Explore the Research

Journal of Medical Internet Research
Journal of Medical Internet Research Journal of Medical Internet Research

AI-Supported Digital Microscopy Diagnostics in Primary Health Care Laboratories: Scoping Review

Background: Digital microscopy combined with artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being implemented in health care, predominantly in advanced laboratory settings. However, AI-supported digital microscopy could be especially advantageous in primary health care settings, since such methods could improve access to diagnostics via automation and a decreased need for experts on-site. To our knowledge, no scoping or systematic review has previously examined the use of AI-supported digital microscopy in primary health care laboratories, and a scoping review could guide future research by providing insights into the challenges of implementing these novel methods. Objective: This scoping review aimed to map published peer-reviewed studies on AI-supported digital microscopy in primary health care laboratories to generate an overview of the subject. Methods: A systematic search of the databases PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and IEEE was conducted on October 2, 2024. The inclusion criteria in the scoping review were based on three concepts: using digital microscopy, AI, and comparison of the results to a standard diagnostic system; and one context, being performed in primary health care laboratories. Additional inclusion criteria were peer reviewed diagnostic accuracy studies published in English, performed on humans and achieving a sample level diagnosis. The study selection and data extraction were performed by two independent researchers, and cases of disagreement were resolved through discussion with a third researcher. The methodology is in accordance with the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. Results: A total of 3,403 articles were screened during the article identification process, of which 22 (0.6%) were included in the scoping review. The samples analyzed were as follows: blood (n=12) for blood cell and malaria detection; urine (n=4) for urinalysis and parasite detection; cytology of atypical oral (n=1) and cervical cells (n=2); stool (n=2) for parasite detection; and sputum (n=1) for ferning-patterns indicating inflammation. Both conventional (n=15) and specifically developed methods (n=7) were used in sample preparation. The AI-supported digital microscopy achieved comparable diagnostic accuracy to the reference standard for complete blood counts, malaria detection, identification of stool and genitourinary parasites, screening for oral and cervical cellular atypia, detection of pulmonary inflammation, and urinalysis. Furthermore, AI-supported digital microscopy achieved higher sensitivity than manual microscopy in six out of seven (85.7%) studies that used a reference standard that allowed for this comparison. Conclusions: AI-supported digital microscopy achieved comparable diagnostic accuracy to the reference standard for diagnosing multiple targets in primary health care laboratories and may be particularly advantageous for improving diagnostic sensitivity. With further research addressing challenges such as scalability and cost-effectiveness, AI-supported digital microscopy could improve access to diagnostics, especially in expert-scarce and resource-limited settings.

The World Health Organization (WHO) has highlighted how crucial it is to bring diagnostics closer to patients in primary health care. Yet many clinics in resource-constrained settings still lack access to basic laboratory testing. When accurate tests can be performed at the point of care, results are usually achieved faster, which improves treatment decisions and reduces the risk of diagnostic errors.

Manual microscopy remains a cornerstone of diagnostics in primary healthcare as it is affordable, versatile, and allows clinicians and laboratory staff to directly visualize pathogens and cellular changes in the sample. However, high-quality microscopy depends on skilled personnel and reliable infrastructure, both of which are limited in primary healthcare settings with constrained resources. This can lead to large differences in diagnostic quality and access between facilities and regions.

AI-supported digital microscopy is emerging as a powerful technology for laboratory diagnostics and may be particularly valuable in primary healthcare. By automating parts of the microscopy workflow and reducing reliance on on-site experts, it can help overcome limitations of traditional manual microscopy. This has the potential to improve access to diagnostic services where they are needed most, especially in expert-scarce settings such as low- and middle-income countries and sparsely populated areas in high-income countries.

In the scoping review, the researchers identified articles investigating complete end to end AI-supported digital microscopy in primary health-care laboratories world-wide. End-to-end AI-based diagnostics here refers to a complete diagnostic workflow from collecting and digitizing samples to generating diagnostic results on a sample level. This was done through a systematic search of four scientific databases where articles were identified that reported results on diagnostic accuracy using digital microscopy, AI, and being performed in primary health care laboratories. A total of 3,403 articles were identified during the initial search, of which 22 (0.6%) were included after the screening process in the scoping review.

The results of the scoping review highlighted a broad applicability of AI-supported digital microscopy: “What stands out in our review is the breadth of applications where AI-supported digital microscopy shows promise, ranging from complete blood counts and malaria detection to stool parasites and cervical cancer screening” says Nina Linder, senior researcher from FIMM and professor at Uppsala University. “Many of the applications focus on conditions that place a disproportionate burden on vulnerable groups, for example cervical cancer screening among women and different parasitic infections among children” says Professor Linder. “If we can bring these AI-based tools into primary health care and point-of-care settings, we have a real opportunity to narrow diagnostic gaps for those who need it most,” says Professor Johan Lundin, senior co-author from FIMM and Karolinska Institutet.

Another main finding was the high diagnostic accuracy achieved with AI-supported digital microscopy. “In our review, AI-supported digital microscopy showcased diagnostic accuracy comparable to manual microscopy” says Dr Joar von Bahr, first author from FIMM and Karolinska Institutet. “Particularly encouraging was that AI-supported systems showed higher sensitivity than manual microscopy in six out of seven studies that made this comparison. This level of performance suggests that AI-supported digital microscopy may ultimately be used to enhance the diagnostic accuracy in primary healthcare” says von Bahr.

“Although AI-supported digital microscopy shows great promise, our review shows that the next step is to move beyond pilots and develop solutions that are scalable, transferable, and truly workable in routine practice. These systems ought to be cost-effective, and easy to implement across diverse laboratories,” says Professor Linder. 

The study was carried out in collaboration between the Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM) at the University of Helsinki, Karolinska Institutet, Uppsala University, and was supported by the Erling-Persson Foundation, Wallenberg Autonomous Systems and Software Program (WASP) funded by the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, the Swedish Research Council, and Finska läkarsällskapet, Liv och Hälsa, Sigrid Jusélius foundations in Finland.

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Scholars at Risk
Research Communities > Scholars at Risk
Artificial Intelligence
Mathematics and Computing > Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
Primary Care Medicine
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Clinical Medicine > Primary Care Medicine
Global Health
Humanities and Social Sciences > Society > Sociology > Health, Medicine and Society > Global Health
Diagnostic Devices
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Clinical Medicine > Diagnosis > Diagnostic Devices
Biological Microscopy
Life Sciences > Biological Sciences > Biological Techniques > Biological Imaging > Biological Microscopy