How Do Heavy Metals Move Through Hard-Rock Aquifers? New Insights from Multi-Layered Column Experiments

Understanding how heavy metals move through hard-rock aquifers is vital for groundwater safety. Using laboratory columns mimicking layered basaltic, limestone and granitic systems, study reveals how mineralogy and evolving water chemistry control the transport and retention of cadmium and chromate.
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Explore the Research

SpringerLink
SpringerLink SpringerLink

Fate and retention behavior of varying charged heavy metals in monolithic and multi-layered hard-rock subsurface environments - Environmental Science and Pollution Research

Understanding contaminant fate and transport in hard rock aquifers under varying geochemical conditions is crucial for assessing groundwater contamination possibilities. Present study examines the retention and transport behavior of heavy metals in multi-layered subsurface aquifer systems. Three subsurface mimicking multi-layered columns were prepared representing basaltic (basalt-serpentine-bentonite), limestone (limestone-calcite-shale), and granitic (granite-feldspar-kaolinite) aquifer materials to evaluate their contaminant retention potential. Batch experiments revealed that serpentine (486.9 mg/kg for Cr and 3094 mg/kg for Cd) and calcite (3952 mg/kg for Cd) exhibited the highest retention capacities among the respective aquifer lithologies. Ionic competition studies suggested that retention of chromate ions was largely unaffected in the presence of Cd2+. Results from column transport experiments demonstrate distinct contaminant retention behaviors in monolithic and multi-layered rock systems. Cadmium exhibited higher retention than chromium, with values reaching 5781.7 mg/kg in serpentine and 5791.7 mg/kg in limestone triplets, compared to 260 mg/kg for chromium in limestone. Multi-layered systems showed altered water chemistry, significantly affecting retention. For instance, in the limestone triplet, chromium retention was 2.9 mg/kg compared to 87.2 mg/kg for averaged monolithic columns, while cadmium retention exceeded 5791.7 mg/kg compared to monolithic columns average of 917.7 mg/kg. Similarly, basaltic and granitic systems exhibited deviations between calculated and actual retention values. These results underline the critical roles of variations in mineral composition between multiple subsurface layers, geochemical conditions, and water chemistry in controlling contaminant mobility in hard-rock aquifer systems.

Groundwater contamination by heavy metals remains one of the most persistent environmental challenges worldwide. While soft sediment aquifers have been widely studied, far less is understood about how contaminants behave in hard-rock aquifer systems—which dominate large parts of India and many regions globally.

In our recent study published in Environmental Science and Pollution Research, we explored how two contrasting contaminants—cadmium (Cd²⁺) and chromate (CrO₄²⁻)—interact with different hard-rock environments under realistic subsurface conditions.

What did we do?
We designed laboratory systems that mimic natural aquifers using both:

  • Monolithic columns (single rock/mineral type), and

  • Multi-layered columns representing real geological sequences such as:

    • Basalt–Serpentine–Bentonite

    • Limestone–Calcite–Shale

    • Granite–Feldspar–Kaolinite

This allowed us to examine how contaminants actually travel through layered subsurface formations rather than idealized single materials.

Key Findings

Mineralogy matters: Carbonate-rich and serpentine materials showed exceptionally high retention of cadmium (up to ~5800 mg/kg), mainly through ion exchange and structural incorporation.

Charge controls behavior: Cr(VI) (anionic) and Cd(II) (cationic) behaved very differently. Chromate retention depended largely on surface charge, while cadmium was strongly governed by ion-exchange processes.

Layering changes everything: Multi-layered systems did not behave as simple averages of their individual components. Water chemistry evolved as it passed through successive layers, dramatically altering contaminant mobility.

Granitic systems were least reactive, suggesting higher vulnerability to heavy-metal transport compared to basaltic and limestone aquifers.

Why This Matters

Hard-rock aquifers supply drinking water to millions, yet their contaminant attenuation capacity is poorly constrained. Our work highlights that realistic multi-layer geochemistry must be considered when predicting groundwater risk and designing remediation strategies.

Understanding these processes can help environmental scientists and policymakers better assess where natural geological barriers can protect groundwater—and where additional intervention is urgently needed.

We hope this study sparks further discussion on incorporating true subsurface complexity into contaminant transport models.

Read the full article to explore the experiments and findings in detail.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-026-37400-z?utm_source=rct_congratemailt&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nonoa_20260115&utm_content=10.1007/s11356-026-37400-z

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Environmental Chemistry
Physical Sciences > Earth and Environmental Sciences > Environmental Sciences > Environmental Chemistry
Environmental Monitoring
Physical Sciences > Chemistry > Analytical Chemistry > Environmental Monitoring
Soil and Water Protection
Technology and Engineering > Civil Engineering > Environmental Civil Engineering > Soil and Water Protection
Water Quality and Water Pollution
Physical Sciences > Earth and Environmental Sciences > Environmental Sciences > Pollution > Water Quality and Water Pollution