Investing in sustainable health: Insights from BMC Nutrition for European Public Health Week 2026

In this blog, we highlight recent BMC Nutrition studies that support the themes of European Public Health Week 2026, spanning planetary health, food systems, individual behaviours, and clinical outcomes.
Investing in sustainable health: Insights from BMC Nutrition for European Public Health Week 2026
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks
European Public Health Week (EUPHW), taking place from 4–8 May 2026, is an annual initiative led by the European Public Health Association, bringing together researchers, policymakers, and practitioners from across Europe. It offers a valuable moment to reflect on shared public health priorities and to strengthen collaboration in tackling the challenges we face. Each year, EUPHW highlights the critical role of research and evidence in shaping healthier, more equitable societies. The 2026 theme, “Investing for sustainable health and well-being,” draws attention to the importance of long-term, systems-level thinking—encompassing prevention, equity, workforce development, and the integration of health across all policies. 
 
In this context, we are pleased to showcase a selection of recent research published in BMC Nutrition. These articles reflect the breadth and diversity of work across nutritional science and public health nutrition—areas that are central to addressing some of today’s most pressing challenges, including non-communicable diseases, dietary transitions, and health inequalities. Together, they highlight the value of evidence-based approaches and interdisciplinary collaboration in advancing sustainable health and well-being across Europe and beyond.
 
Recent research in BMC Nutrition reflects many of the themes at the heart of this year’s EUPHW. For example,  work from the Netherlands by Corné van Dooren et al.,  explores the feasibility of aligning dietary recommendations with both health and environmental sustainability. Using a modelling approach, the authors assess how current dietary patterns compare with reference diets designed to stay within planetary boundaries while meeting nutritional requirements. The findings show that substantial dietary shifts would be needed to simultaneously achieve optimal health outcomes and environmental targets, particularly through reduced consumption of animal-based products and increased intake of plant-based foods. The study highlights the challenges and trade-offs involved in developing truly sustainable dietary guidelines at the population level. 
  
Understanding how individuals engage with such transitions is equally important. A scoping review  from the Robert Koch Institute in Germany, synthesising evidence from 93 studies, suggests that awareness of the link between meat consumption and climate change remains relatively low. Instead, people are more often motivated by health concerns and animal welfare. This gap between environmental knowledge and behaviour points to the need for clearer, more targeted public health messaging.
 
Several studies also highlight how behavioural and societal factors shape dietary change.  Research from Norway by Øverby and colleagues shows that web-based tools can support healthier preconception diets, particularly when they provide clear and practical guidance that makes behaviour change feel achievable. At the same time, a separate Norwegian study by Løvhaug et al., underscores the importance of collaboration in food system transformation. Drawing on perspectives from a large cross-sector partnership, the authors show that even in well-established collaborative environments, early alignment on roles, expectations, and shared goals is critical to success.
 
Insights into consumer attitudes are further provided by a  study of German adolescents, which finds generally positive views towards milk alternatives, driven by perceived health, environmental, and animal welfare benefits. However, barriers such as taste preferences, cost, and concerns about nutritional adequacy remain, highlighting where targeted education could help support more sustainable choices.
 
Beyond individual behaviour, questions of equity and access are also central. A study from Spain examining charitable food aid in Barcelona reveals that while food parcels may meet some energy needs, they often fall short in key micronutrients such as calcium, vitamin D, and zinc, and can exceed recommended levels of fat and sodium. These findings point to important nutritional gaps and the need to better align food aid provision with dietary guidelines.
 
At a global level, strengthening how we measure diet quality is another key priority. Research led by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) highlights inconsistencies in how the Minimum Dietary Diversity for Women (MDD-W) indicator is assessed across major surveys. Differences in questionnaire design and classification approaches can lead to varying estimates, raising important questions around comparability in public health monitoring.
 
Finally, work by Rydhög and colleagues provides insight into dietary patterns within intervention settings, showing that greater adherence to a Paleolithic-style diet was associated with more favourable weight and cardiometabolic outcomes, although without clear additional benefits beyond the broader lifestyle intervention. This highlights the value of detailed dietary pattern metrics in understanding how diet relates to health outcomes.
 
Taken together, these studies illustrate the breadth of nutrition research contributing to public health priorities in Europe and beyond. From planetary boundaries and sustainable dietary transitions, to equity in food systems, improvements in nutrition surveillance, and advances in behavioural and clinical research, they point to the multiple, interconnected levers needed to improve population health. As European Public Health Week emphasises the importance of investing in sustainable health and well-being, this body of work reinforces the value of integrated, evidence-based approaches that bring together environmental, social, and biological perspectives on nutrition.
 

 

Open Collections 

BMC Nutrition continues to support these priorities through its open collections, which bring together research on key public health themes and create focal points for emerging areas of inquiry.  


  

For a wider perspective on how these themes are being explored across Springer Nature, see this recent post from Alex Goodridge https://communities.springernature.com/posts/european-public-health-week-2026-investing-for-sustainable-health-and-well-being 

Follow the Topic

Nutrition
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Health Care > Nutrition
Sustainability
Research Communities > Community > Sustainability
Public Health
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Public Health

What are SDG Topics?

An introduction to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Topics and their role in highlighting sustainable development research.

Continue reading announcement

Related Collections

With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Climate change and nutrition

The interconnections between climate change and nutrition are increasingly recognized as critical to global health and sustainability. Understanding this nexus is vital as we confront the multifaceted challenges posed by a rapidly changing climate. The food system is a significant contributor to greenhouse gas emissions but is also vulnerable to the adverse impacts of climate change. This creates a pressing need for research that informs nutrition-sensitive climate policies and promotes climate-resilient nutrition strategies.

Recent advances in this area highlight the progress being made. Studies have revealed the potential of climate-resilient systems that not only withstand climate stresses but also enhance nutritional outcomes. For example, agroecological practices are being adopted globally, demonstrating benefits for both farmer livelihoods and local dietary diversity. Furthermore, the development of innovative frameworks for assessing the climate nutrition nexus allows for more robust evaluations of policy interventions. These efforts have laid the groundwork for more nuanced understanding and strategies.

Looking forward, the field must increasingly move beyond documenting impacts towards identifying, testing and scaling practical solutions. Climate change disproportionately affects populations in the Global South, where fragile health systems, conflict, displacement and humanitarian crises compound existing vulnerabilities and magnify the nutritional consequences of climate shocks. There is therefore an urgent need for locally driven, contextually adapted and equitable solutions that can strengthen resilience and improve nutrition in the most vulnerable settings.

Addressing these challenges will require stronger interdisciplinary collaboration, bringing together nutritionists with social scientists, anthropologists, implementation scientists, global health researchers, environmental and agricultural scientists, economists and policymakers. Advances in implementation science, biotechnological methods, systems thinking, data analytics and climate-informed decision support offer exciting opportunities to accelerate the translation of evidence into effective policies and programs. By integrating nutrition with climate adaptation and resilience strategies, researchers can help shape healthier, more equitable and sustainable food systems for the future.

Topics of interest include, but are not limited to:

  • Climate-resilient systems for nutrition
  • Nutrition-sensitive climate policies
  • Implementation science for climate-resilient nutrition interventions
  • Locally led and contextually adapted solutions in climate-vulnerable settings
  • Community-based and participatory approaches to climate adaptation
  • Planetary health diets
  • Diet-related greenhouse gas emissions
  • Climate change adaptation strategies including early warning systems for nutrition
  • Climate nutrition nexus assessments including vulnerability, impacts, coping and resilience
  • Global policy implications
  • Nutrition equity in a changing climate
  • Nutrition and climate adaptation frameworks

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being.

All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Apr 14, 2027

Diet quality and food security in public health

The relationship between diet quality and food security is a pivotal aspect of public health nutrition, with profound implications for individual and community well-being. Continued exploration in this area is essential in addressing endemic malnutrition and ensuring nutritional security for all populations. With substantial global challenges such as rising food insecurity and escalating rates of diet-related chronic diseases, advancing our understanding of these interconnected domains provides critical insights for creating effective, sustainable public health strategies.

Recent advances have addressed the complex interactions between food systems, socioeconomic determinants, and health outcomes. Studies have demonstrated that improved dietary diversity correlates strongly with better nutritional adequacy and reduced rates of micronutrient deficiencies. For instance, researchers have established that access to a variety of food groups significantly enhances the micronutrient profile of diets, reducing the risk of prevalent deficiencies in essential vitamins and minerals. Furthermore, emerging research has highlighted the impact of household food insecurity as a key determinant of diet quality; families experiencing food insecurity often resort to less nutritious, calorie-dense options, exacerbating issues of malnutrition.

Public health nutrition has made notable strides in identifying and addressing the diverse factors that contribute to food security challenges. In particular, the integration of behavioral and community-based approaches has yielded promising results in improving dietary practices among vulnerable populations. These advances have laid the groundwork for more targeted interventions, which have proven effective in managing the dual burden of malnutrition—both undernutrition and obesity—coexisting in many regions.

Looking ahead, the potential for future advances in this field is vast. Continuous research can provide insights into innovative food systems that promote both diet quality and food security, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. The application of technology, such as data analytics and machine learning, may allow us to better understand patterns of food consumption and the socioeconomic factors impacting dietary choices. Additionally, interdisciplinary approaches that bring together specialists in nutrition, agriculture, and public policy will enhance our capacity to devise comprehensive strategies that strengthen food security while promoting healthy dietary practices.

Topics of interest include, but are not limited to:

  • Nutritional adequacy and health outcomes
  • Socioeconomic determinants of diet quality
  • Household food insecurity assessments
  • Impacts of food systems on public health
  • Strategies for enhancing dietary diversity
  • Policy approaches to food security
  • Interventions to combat micronutrient deficiencies
  • Innovations in public health nutrition

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being.

All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Mar 24, 2027