Legal Doesn’t Mean Understood: A Tool for Cannabis Literacy

Legal cannabis is here — but what do people really know about its health effects? We developed and validated a tool to measure cannabis health literacy: a step toward safer use, better education, and informed policy.

Published in Public Health and Education

Legal Doesn’t Mean Understood: A Tool for Cannabis Literacy
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Explore the Research

BioMed Central
BioMed Central BioMed Central

Development of a cannabis health literacy questionnaire: preliminary validation using the Rasch model - BMC Public Health

Background As cannabis becomes more integrated into Canadian society for medical and non-medical purposes, public health efforts have aimed to enhance public awareness and knowledge of the potential risks associated with cannabis use. However, no validated or established method to measure cannabis health literacy exists, limiting the ability to evaluate the impacts of public awareness initiatives. We aimed to develop and preliminarily validate a cannabis health literacy questionnaire (CHLQ) designed to measure an individual’s knowledge, understanding and utilization of health and safety information related to cannabis. Methods The CHLQ was developed using existing health literacy domains and alcohol health literacy attributes as a framework. The questions were informed by extensive literature, item-response theory principles and input from stakeholders and people who use cannabis. The CHLQ includes four dimensions: knowledge of cannabis, knowledge of risks, understanding of associated risks and harms, and the ability to seek, access and use cannabis information. Adult participants were recruited through an online survey platform and social media. The questionnaire was refined and revised over three iterations using the Rasch analysis. Our preliminary validation process analyzed the CHLQ’s reliability and construct validity examining separation reliability, item difficulty, item fit statistics and unidimensionality. Results A total of 1035 individuals across Canada completed our CHLQ. Each dimension of the CHLQ, had a well-distributed range of question difficulties. Across the four dimensions, item separation ranged from 9.93 to 17.29, and item reliability ranged from 0.99 to 1.00. Person separation ranged from 0.99 to 1.88, while person reliability ranged from 0.49 to 0.78. Most questions fit within the model, and unidimensionality was supported for all dimensions. Each dimension is scored separately with high scores indicating high knowledge or understanding for the respective domain. Raw scores for each dimension can be transformed to a linear Rasch score. Conclusions The CHLQ is a preliminary, multi-dimensional tool designed to measure cannabis health literacy for educational and research use. It demonstrates promising psychometric properties and provides an initial framework to inform public health efforts. Further validation in diverse population and settings is needed. The CHLQ provides foundation for future research, evaluation and public education efforts related to cannabis use.

Behind the Idea

When I first began thinking about this research, cannabis legalization in Canada was gaining momentum and with it, a wave of public opinions, media buzz, and policy shifts. But I felt as though something was missing. While cannabis is generally considered low risk compared to other substances, the reality is: anything you put in your body carries potential risks.

The normalization of cannabis use was moving quickly — maybe faster than our collective understanding. That was the spark. I started wondering: What do people really know about cannabis, its effects, and its potential harms? Not just anecdotally or on social media, but in a way that could be measured, studied, and used to inform public health strategies. If cannabis was going mainstream, so should cannabis education.

That led me to an idea that felt simple at first: build a tool to measure cannabis health literacy. A questionnaire. Something that could capture what the public knows (or doesn't know) about cannabis, validate that measure, and potentially use it later as a way to inform or assess education efforts in clinical or community settings.

Why It Matters

This research began with a core question: What do people actually know about cannabis, its risks, its effects, and its role in health? As legalization moves forward, understanding doesn’t automatically follow. Public education efforts exist, but their reach and impact remain unclear.

So, we asked: What should people know to make informed decisions? And just as importantly, how can we measure that knowledge in a valid, reliable way?

Cannabis health literacy isn’t just about knowing what Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) or Cannabidiol (CBD) stand for. It’s about having the skills to make informed, safe, and intentional choices — especially as cannabis becomes more accessible. It draws on core health literacy principles: the ability to seek, understand, and apply health information to real-life decisions.

By creating a validated tool to measure that knowledge, we’re one step closer to supporting public education, informed policy, and better integration of cannabis-related conversations in healthcare. Whether it’s doctors screening patients, educators shaping harm reduction curricula, or governments assessing the impact of legalization, a literacy tool is a foundation to build on.

Key Highlights from the study

  • We developed the Cannabis Health Literacy Questionnaire (CHLQ) to assess individuals’ knowledge, understanding, and application of cannabis-related health and safety information across four dimensions:
    1. Knowledge of Cannabis (e.g. components, potency)
    2. Knowledge of Risks (e.g. mental and physical health)
    3. Understanding of Harms and Consequences (i.e., applying risk knowledge to real life)
    4. Ability to Seek, Access, and Use Cannabis Health Information (i.e., interacting with cannabis- health related information)
  • The tool was guided by established health literacy frameworks and refined through three iterative rounds with input from stakeholders and cannabis consumers.
  • We used Rasch analysis to validate the four dimensions, evaluating item difficulty, model fit, item and person separation, reliability, and unidimensionality.
  • Each dimension has a separate scoring system; higher raw scores indicate greater literacy in that area.
  • The CHLQ is suitable for use in descriptive and educational research. However, further validation — particularly across diverse populations and over time — is needed.

Looking Ahead

I hope this paper sparks a broader conversation about what I’d call “substance literacy” — not just for cannabis, but across the spectrum of substances. When we talk about harm reduction, we often focus on access and treatment. But understanding is harm reduction too.

We’re continuing to assess cannabis health literacy and are preparing a follow-up paper exploring what Canadians knew at the time of data collection. We welcome feedback and collaboration to further strengthen and refine the questionnaire.

My hope is that it opens doors for further research, better dialogue, and more thoughtful public health approaches. As cannabis shifts from taboo to typical, we need tools that keep pace with public knowledge and conversation.

The paper is now out in the world — but the conversation is just beginning.

Read the full paper here: Development of a cannabis health literacy questionnaire: preliminary validation using the Rasch model

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Public Health
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Public Health
Literacy
Humanities and Social Sciences > Education > Skills > Literacy

Related Collections

With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Endocrine disruption as a public health issue

BMC Public Health invites submissions to our new Collection, Endocrine disruption as a public health issue. Endocrine disruption has emerged as a growing public health challenge, characterized by the interference of certain chemicals with the normal functioning of the endocrine system. Endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) can mimic, block, or alter hormone signaling, leading to a range of adverse health outcomes. Common sources of EDC exposure include everyday products such as plastics, pesticides, and personal care items, all of which can release substances like bisphenols and phthalates into the environment and human body. Understanding the links between exposure to EDCs and eventual health outcomes is vital for assessing their implications for population health.

We welcome submissions that delve into various aspects of endocrine disruption. Key topics of interest include, but are not limited to:

Role of EDCs in metabolic, endocrine and immune-related disorders

Effect of EDCs in consumer products including personal care products

The links between EDC exposure and male and female reproductive health problems

The links between EDC exposure and certain cancers

Insights into the long-term consequences of early-life EDC exposure and transgenerational effects

Methodological advances in assessing the health impacts of EDC mixtures and cumulative exposures

Development and application of statistical approaches to better estimate the health effects of chronic and/or concurrent exposure

Validating models of cumulative exposure with measurement of combinations of EDCs in human tissues

Individual- and policy-level interventions to address health impacts of EDC exposures

The search for substitutes lacking endocrine disrupting properties

All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Feb 26, 2026

Male reproductive health

BMC Public Health invites submissions to our new Collection, "Male reproductive health”. Male reproductive health is an essential yet often overlooked aspect of public health that encompasses various factors affecting men's fertility and overall well-being. Issues such as declining sperm counts, poor sperm quality, the impact of environmental exposures and the effects of lifestyle and dietary factors on reproductive outcomes are gaining increasing attention.

This Collection seeks to examine the multifaceted influences on male reproductive health, considering environmental, infectious and sociocultural dimensions that affect male reproductive parameters and contribute to fertility challenges. Continued research in this area could help identify causative factors and contribute to advances in public health policies, ultimately benefiting future generations.

Key topics of interest include, but are not limited to:

Environmental pollution and reproductive health

Sperm count trends and implications for fertility

The role of occupational exposures in male fertility

The effects of infectious diseases on sperm parameters

Impact of diet and lifestyle factors on sperm quality and fertility

Psychological factors influencing reproductive health

Interventions for improving male reproductive health

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to Sustainable Development Goal 3- Good Health and Well-Being.

All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Dec 27, 2025