Quantum Countdown: Protecting the Internet of Things Before It’s Too Late

IoT revolution is building on a fragile foundation: encryption that quantum computers will break. Our systematic review maps this urgent threat to smart cities, healthcare, and industry, and evaluates the next-generation shields, where PQC needed to secure our connected future before it's too late.

Published in Physics and Computational Sciences

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Quantum countdown

Billions of new devices from smart thermostats to industrial sensors join the Internet of Things (IoT) in every day practices. They make our cities smarter and our healthcare more responsive as our lives are also more convenient in general. But silently a countdown has begun. The encryption that guards these devices and a digital lock we’ve trusted for decades is on the verge of being picked by a new kind of technology: the quantum computer.

Our recent systematic review, “Systematic Review on Securing IoT Systems with Post Quantum Cryptography Emerging Threats, Countermeasures, and Future Research Needs,” published in Discover Internet of Things, was not only an academic study. It was a race to map the vulnerabilities of our connected world and to find the next generation of shields before time runs out.

Emerging threat

Modern cryptography, the complex math that secures our online bank transfers and smart home cameras mainly relies on problems that are incredibly hard for classical computers to solve. However, quantum computers do not play by the same rules rather qubits (quantum bits) applied with exponentially faster in computations. Algorithms like Shor’s algorithm could break these “hard” problems in minutes and rendering much of today’s security obsolete. This isn’t just a data privacy issue for IoT; it leads to a massive application crisis. A compromised smart grid, medical device, or autonomous vehicle network could have catastrophic real-world consequences.

We began our work with a systematic approach that guided by the rigorous PRISMA 2020 framework where it is spanned nine major databases including IEEE Xplore, Scopus, ACM, MDPI, Springer, ScienceDirect, Wiley, Google Scholar, and Nature yielding over 5,151 studies from the last five years. After meticulously distilled this vast corpus down to 161 studies, foundation of our analysis established by allowing us to paint a detailed picture of emerging vulnerabilities, evaluate proposed countermeasures, and identify the most urgent actions needed to secure our connected future.

The search for a quantum-resistant shield

The core of our work was evaluating the proposed solutions: Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC). These are new cryptographic systems built on mathematical problems believed to be hard even for quantum computers. But for IoT, security isn’t the only requirement. These devices are often tiny, with limited processing power and battery life. We can’t install a supercomputer’s security software on a temperature sensor.

We analyzed both in descriptive statistics and thematic aspects. We analyzed the major PQC families namely lattice-based, code-based, multivariate, and hash-based signatures through the lens of an IoT engineer. Our analysis revealed that lattice-based cryptography, particularly schemes such as Kyber for key exchange and Dilithium for digital signatures recently standardized by NIST, shows the most promise. It offers a strong balance of security and relative efficiency. However, even these require careful optimization to be truly “lightweight” for the most constrained IoT endpoints with regard to scalability, interoperability and implementation complexity

A transition roadmap: not just a temporary diagnosis

Identifying the problem and the potential solutions is only the first step. The path to implementation is riddled with challenges we cataloged in detail: the overhead of key management, the vulnerability to side-channel attacks, the sheer complexity of upgrading global IoT infrastructure, and the looming threat of “store-now-decrypt-later” attacks where data is harvested today to be broken later.

Therefore, a significant part of our paper is dedicated to a strategic roadmap with the provided a case study on smart grid. We propose a framework centered on hybrid cryptography a transitional approach where classical and PQC algorithms work together. This provides a transmission phase while the new systems are thoroughly tested and optimized. We also emphasize that future research must aggressively tackle lightweight PQC design, robust key management for distributed devices, and above all, global standardization to avoid a fragmented and weak security ecosystem.

Why this work matters now

This research was driven by a sense of urgency. The quantum threat may seem futuristic, but the IoT devices we deploy today have lifespans of 10-20 years. They will absolutely be operating in a world where quantum attacks are a reality. We must act now because quantum advancements are accelerating, while development, standardization, improvement, confidence‑building, and usability of PQC all take significant time. With NIST’s official release of its first finalized PQC standards in 2024, the transition must begin immediately.

Writing this review reinforced that securing the IoT is a monumental and interdisciplinary challenge. It requires cryptographers, hardware engineers, software developers, policymakers, and industry leaders to collaborate as never before. Our paper is a call to start that work in earnest. Through mapping the threats, evaluating the tools, and charting a path forward, we hope to provide a foundational roadmap for building a connected future that is not just smart but also secure for the decades to come.

 You can explore our complete analysis, detailed findings, and the full proposed a strategic roadmap for implementation as a path to future-secured IoT application in the open-access paper:

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43926-025-00275-6

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1007/s43926-025-00275-6

Follow the Topic

Internet of Things
Mathematics and Computing > Computer Science > Computer Engineering and Networks > Internet of Things
Cryptology
Mathematics and Computing > Computer Science > Data and Information Security > Cryptology
Quantum Computing
Mathematics and Computing > Computer Science > Theory of Computation > Models of Computation > Quantum Computing
Security Science and Technology
Physical Sciences > Physics and Astronomy > Applied and Technical Physics > Security Science and Technology
Quantum Communications and Cryptography
Physical Sciences > Physics and Astronomy > Quantum Physics > Quantum Communications and Cryptography

Related Collections

With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

AIoT System and Software Security

The convergence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the Internet of Things (IoT) into AIoT systems promises autonomous, intelligent operations. However, this fusion introduces unique security challenges stemming from heterogeneous architectures, resource-constrained devices, tightly coupled AI-IoT software stacks, and heightened autonomy. Ensuring the security of the underlying software and hardware components is therefore a fundamental prerequisite for the reliable deployment of AIoT.

While traditional cybersecurity has evolved significantly, the distinct nature of the AIoT environment complicates the direct application of existing solutions. This collection focuses on five pivotal and interconnected areas that demand novel research: System and Software Protection, Vulnerability/Bug Detection, Malware Detection, Software Testing, and Privacy for AIoT Systems. Each area presents acute technical questions. For instance: How can we develop practical, lightweight runtime integrity protection for diverse edge devices? How do we detect sophisticated malware designed to exploit both AI model logic and IoT protocol weaknesses? What testing frameworks can validate the security of autonomous AIoT decision-making processes? How can privacy be preserved in pervasive sensing and distributed AI inference?

This collection aims to compile high-quality research contributions focused on these concrete technical challenges. We seek original submissions that present innovative theories, methodologies, tools, or in-depth case studies specifically designed for the AIoT paradigm. By advancing knowledge in these core areas, this collection will contribute to building a robust security and privacy foundation for the next generation of intelligent connected systems. Potential topics include but are not limited to:

  • System and software protection for AIoT (e.g., lightweight runtime integrity, secure boot, trusted execution in constrained devices)
  • Vulnerability and bug detection in AIoT stacks (static and dynamic analysis, fuzzing, automated vulnerability discovery)
  • Malware detection and attribution targeting AIoT (model-targeted attacks, protocol-level exploitation, hybrid malware)
  • Security-focused software testing for autonomous AIoT (testing of decision-making, simulation-based evaluation, continuous validation)
  • Privacy-preserving methods for AIoT (federated learning, secure aggregation, differential privacy, privacy-aware sensing)

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 9.

Keywords: AIoT systems; System and Software Security; Information Security; Privacy; IoT Protocols; Authentication; Vulnerability Detection

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Dec 09, 2026

Blockchain, Differential Privacy, and Federated Intelligence for Secure Internet of Things Systems

The Internet of Things (IoT) has revolutionised modern society by connecting billions of devices across various sectors, including smart homes, healthcare, transportation, and industrial systems. However, this connectivity introduces critical security and privacy challenges. This Topical Collection focuses on three transformative technologies—blockchain, differential privacy, and federated intelligence—that address these challenges.

Blockchain provides decentralized, tamper-proof infrastructures for IoT data integrity and device authentication. Differential privacy offers mathematically rigorous privacy guarantees for IoT data analytics while preserving utility. Federated intelligence enables collaborative machine learning across IoT devices without requiring centralization of sensitive data.

This collection aims to showcase cutting-edge research that integrates these technologies, addresses implementation challenges such as energy efficiency and scalability, and explores real-world applications in smart cities, Industrial IoT, healthcare, and vehicular networks. It will serve as a comprehensive resource for researchers and practitioners developing secure, privacy-preserving IoT ecosystems.

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG3, SDG 9 and SDG11.

Keywords: Blockchain for IoT; Differential Privacy; Federated Learning; IoT Security; Privacy-Preserving IoT; Distributed Ledger Technology; Edge Intelligence; Secure Smart Systems; Federated Intelligence; IoT Data Privacy

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Dec 09, 2026