People Aren’t Stupid: They’re Wary of False Information About COVID-19
Published in General & Internal Medicine and Arts & Humanities
In 2021, I traveled to six West African countries to conduct a study on COVID-19 perceptions and lead training sessions on public awareness. COVID-19 vaccination, which began in March or April depending on the country, was a clear failure—very few people were showing up to get vaccinated. Since February 2020, the WHO had been repeating that an “infodemic” of false information about COVID-19 was “just as dangerous” as the pandemic itself, in the words of its Director-General. This infodemic was often said to explain the low vaccine uptake.
However, the discussions I had and the interviews I conducted did not suggest that people were particularly distrustful of COVID-19 vaccines. A large portion of the population didn’t see themselves at risk from COVID-19. Many believed it was a “white people’s disease” and thought Africans were protected either by the climate or by some kind of natural immunity. Misinformation about vaccines didn’t seem to play a role in the low uptake, even though African countries had the lowest vaccination coverage in the world.
In 2023, I conducted a study on COVID-19 vaccination in Niger, where only 22% of the population was vaccinated. The study confirmed my previous observations (https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.23-0708). A high 73.3% of the population believed that COVID-19 vaccines were “a good thing,” and 83% of those who had heard vaccine promotion messages supported them. This clearly showed that, at least in Niger, low vaccine uptake wasn’t due to mistrust of vaccines.
Since 2021, it had also become clear that the alarmist narratives and articles from 2020 predicting that a wave of misinformation would prevent adequate vaccine coverage had been wrong. In industrialized countries, people rushed to get vaccinated as soon as the vaccines became available. The pessimistic forecasts proved completely off base.
That led me to compare the intention to get vaccinated expressed in 2020 with actual uptake, and to evaluate whether exposure to false information had influenced the gap between intent and uptake. In other words, to see if misinformation had dissuaded some people from getting vaccinated. The results of this study, conducted in 46 countries and published in Discover Public Health, were unequivocal: there is no connection between exposure to misinformation online or on social media and the difference between stated vaccination intentions and actual uptake.
The internet and social media carry far more accurate health information than false information. Studies have shown that, contrary to popular belief, this is even more true for COVID-19 than for other health topics. You’d have to hold the public in pretty low regard to believe they’re more influenced by false information than by accurate information.
Follow the Topic
-
Discover Public Health
This is an open access journal publishing research from all fields relevant to public health.
Related Collections
With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.
Improving Maternal and Infant Health: The Key for Future Wellness
Optimizing health across the life course begins with ensuring equitable, high-quality care during pregnancy, childbirth, and early infancy. Evidence increasingly demonstrates that early-life exposures and experiences are critical determinants of long-term health, shaping risks for chronic disease, developmental outcomes, and overall well-being. Despite progress, disparities in maternal and infant health outcomes persist globally, underscoring the need for innovative, scalable, and evidence-based public health interventions.
This Collection aims to highlight interdisciplinary research and practice-based efforts that advance maternal and infant health from a public health perspective. We welcome contributions that examine population-level strategies, health systems strengthening, community-based interventions, and policy approaches designed to improve care during pregnancy, the birth hospitalization, and early infancy.
Submissions may include original research, implementation studies, and quality improvement initiatives that address prevention, access, equity, and health outcomes across diverse settings. By emphasizing early prevention and system-level improvements, this Collection seeks to contribute to reducing the burden of chronic disease and improving health trajectories across the lifespan.
Topics of interest include, but are not limited to:
--Public health initiatives to improve maternal and pregnancy outcomes
--Community- and population-level strategies to enhance infant health and early development
--Health system and quality improvement interventions in maternal and neonatal care
--Educational and behavioral interventions targeting pregnant individuals, families, and caregivers
--Policies and programs addressing disparities in maternal and infant health
--Preventive approaches to improve early-life health and long-term outcomes
This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3: Good health and Well-Being.
Keywords: Maternal health; Infant health; Safer motherhood; Early-life health; Health services; Healthcare system; Public health
Publishing Model: Open Access
Deadline: Mar 17, 2027
Mental and Behavioral Health in Conflict-Affected Settings: Coping, Resilience, and Social Influences
Conflict-affected settings are characterized by chronic instability, economic hardship, and social disruption, all of which profoundly impact mental and behavioral health. In such contexts, individuals are often exposed to cumulative stressors that increase vulnerability to psychological distress, maladaptive coping strategies, and health-risk behaviors. Understanding the mechanisms that shape mental health outcomes in these environments is essential for developing effective public health interventions.
This Collection aims to advance knowledge on the psychological and behavioral determinants of mental health in conflict-affected populations, with a particular emphasis on personality traits, coping strategies, resilience, and social influences. These factors play a critical role in shaping how individuals perceive, respond to, and adapt to adversity. Personality traits may influence vulnerability or protection against mental health disorders, while coping mechanisms and resilience determine the capacity to manage stress and maintain psychological well-being. In parallel, social influences such as stigma, social norms, and perceived acceptability of behaviors contribute significantly to health-related decision-making and risk behaviors.
We welcome original research articles, systematic reviews, and methodological studies that explore mental and behavioral health outcomes in populations exposed to conflict, political instability, or socioeconomic crises. Studies employing observational, analytical, or longitudinal designs are particularly encouraged, as well as those introducing innovative approaches to measurement and analysis in public health.
By bringing together interdisciplinary research, this Collection seeks to provide a comprehensive understanding of the psychological and social processes underlying mental health in fragile settings. Ultimately, it aims to inform evidence-based interventions, support policy development, and strengthen mental health systems in regions affected by conflict and crisis.
This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3: Good health and Well-Being.
Keywords: Mental health; Behavior health; Refugees; Conflict-affected populations; Coping; Resilience; Social Influences; Well-being; Psychological distress
Publishing Model: Open Access
Deadline: Mar 05, 2027
