The use of e-commerce applications in Latin America: individual and structural influences during COVID-19
Published in Research Data and Arts & Humanities
E-commerce Adoption in Latin America During COVID-19: Individual Behavior, Structural Conditions, and What Happens Behind the Research
Introduction
The COVID-19 pandemic triggered one of the fastest and most profound digital transformations ever recorded, particularly in emerging economies such as those of Latin America. While e-commerce adoption surged almost overnight, the mechanisms driving this shift were far from uniform. My research explored a central question: Why did some people adopt e-commerce apps much more readily than others, and how did national market conditions shape this behavior?
This blog post expands on the scientific article I recently published, offering not only a summary of the findings but also the behind-the-scenes elements of the project — how the study was conceived, why these questions matter to me personally, and how they can benefit members of this Community.
Why This Study? A Personal and Regional Motivation
Growing up and working in Latin America, I have always witnessed the stark inequalities that shape access to technology. When COVID-19 hit, these gaps became painfully visible — people who relied entirely on face-to-face transactions suddenly faced lockdowns and mobility restrictions. Yet others shifted seamlessly into digital purchasing.
I wanted to understand:
-
What explains these differences?
-
Are they purely individual — trust, digital habits, social media engagement?
-
Or are they structural — infrastructure, purchasing power, logistics, connectivity?
-
And how much does each level actually matter?
This research became, in many ways, a way to make sense of what I was seeing around me: families struggling with digital divides, small businesses forced online, and entire markets accelerating into digitalization unevenly.
Behind the Research: How the Study Was Built
To answer these questions, I used two large datasets:
1. Latinobarómetro 2020 (individual-level data)
A long-standing public opinion database with responses from 18 Latin American countries. It provided:
-
interpersonal trust
-
social network usage (Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp)
-
self-reported social class
-
age and gender
-
and most importantly, which e-commerce apps people used (Mercado Libre, Amazon, food delivery apps)
After cleaning missing values, the final dataset included 12,309 respondents.
2. Market Potential Index (country-level data)
This database captures national-level market characteristics, such as:
-
market size
-
market intensity
-
consumer capacity
-
commercial infrastructure (logistics, internet speed, broadband, paved roads, mobile subscribers, etc.)
This allowed us to pair each individual with the structural profile of their country.
Why Use a Multilevel Model? The Hidden Challenge
One of the biggest methodological challenges was the fact that individuals are nested within countries. This means that:
-
People from the same country share economic conditions, cultural patterns, and digital infrastructure.
-
This violates the independence assumption required in traditional regression models.
To solve this, we used a multilevel regression model with random intercepts. This approach lets us:
-
examine individual differences and structural differences simultaneously
-
quantify how much variation in behavior is due to personal factors versus country factors
-
avoid biased conclusions that might blame individuals for behaviors shaped by structural constraints
An interesting behind-the-scenes moment:
When we ran the Null Model, we discovered that 12% of all variation in e-commerce use comes strictly from country-level differences — a remarkably high number for behavioral research.
Key Findings: What Really Drives E-commerce Use?
1. Interpersonal trust matters — a lot
Trust reduces perceived risk. People who trust others are more willing to buy online, share information, and try digital payments.
This aligns with Latin America’s context, where institutional trust is often low, making interpersonal trust even more valuable.
2. Social media usage is the strongest predictor
Individuals who used more social networks (especially WhatsApp, Instagram, and Facebook) were far more likely to adopt e-commerce apps.
Social networks serve as:
-
marketplaces
-
channels for recommendations
-
spaces where risk is reduced through social proof
During lockdowns, this became even more evident as small sellers and large platforms converged on social media.
3. Structural factors matter — but less than expected
Three structural variables had positive, but modest effects:
-
market size
-
consumer capacity (purchasing power)
-
commercial infrastructure
These factors help determine access to digital platforms (internet quality, logistics, payments).
4. Market intensity had no significant effect
Contrary to expectations, per capita income and private consumption did not explain differences in e-commerce use.
This suggests that adoption is not simply a matter of national wealth — digital readiness, trust, and social habits play a larger role.
Interpreting These Results: What They Mean for the Community
For researchers, practitioners, and policymakers in this Community, the study provides several insights:
1. Digital adoption is both social and technological
E-commerce adoption is not merely a product of “better technology” but rather:
-
how people perceive trust
-
how they use social networks
-
how countries structure their commercial ecosystems
This supports the UTAUT model’s emphasis on social influence and facilitating conditions.
2. Infrastructure still sets the boundaries
Even if individuals are willing, adoption can only flourish where logistics, connectivity, and payment systems are available.
This is especially relevant for members working on digital transformation strategies.
3. Social media is no longer auxiliary — it is central
For businesses and digital innovators, social media is not just marketing.
It is a gateway to e-commerce adoption, especially in emerging markets where formal digital ecosystems are uneven.
Why This Study Matters to Me — and to Our Community
This research sits at the intersection of economics, technology, and social behavior, a combination I find deeply meaningful.
For me personally, the study reflects a desire to understand how digitalization can either empower or exclude people in regions marked by structural inequality.
For the Community, I hope this research contributes by:
-
encouraging discussions on inclusive digital transformation
-
offering a methodological reference for multilevel analysis
-
and fostering debate on how trust, infrastructure, and social behavior shape technology adoption
Conclusion
The adoption of e-commerce applications in Latin America during COVID-19 was not random. It resulted from a complex interplay of personal trust, social media engagement, and national economic and technological conditions.
By combining individual and structural data, this study demonstrates that digital adoption in emerging markets requires both human and infrastructural readiness.
I look forward to hearing your thoughts, questions, and perspectives, and engaging further with this Community to deepen these discussions.
Master’s student in Business Administration at the Graduate Program in Business Administration of the State University of Ceará (PPGA/UECE), with a research focus on marketing and consumer behavior. Holds a Bachelor’s degree in Business Administration from the State University of Ceará (2023) and a technical degree in Telecommunications from the Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Ceará (IFCE, 2018), integrated with secondary education. Possesses professional experience in the fields of Business Administration and Telecommunications, with an emphasis on project management, procurement, public bidding, and administrative processes. Currently engages in research centered on consumption dynamics, digital culture, and marketing strategies, exploring phenomena such as user engagement, the social and solidarity economy, and digital platforms.
Follow the Topic
-
Future Business Journal
This is an open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing theoretical and empirical research papers covering the major aspects of management, accounting, economics, management information systems and finance.
Related Collections
With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.
Agentic AI in Marketing: Delegated Consumer Agency, Brand Stewardship, Algorithmic Contestability, and Sustainable Market Value
Generative artificial intelligence is progressing beyond content generation and decision support toward increasingly agentic systems. These systems can interpret goals, decompose tasks, evaluate alternatives, coordinate actions, negotiate conditions, and execute authorized marketplace decisions with limited human intervention (Bilgihan et al., 2026; Alabed et al., 2024).
In marketing, this transition from recommendation to delegated execution is particularly consequential. Brand-controlled agents may manage targeting, personalization, pricing, customer service, relationship development, and service recovery. Consumer-side agents may search markets, compare offerings, negotiate transactions, and purchase on behalf of individuals (Arya V., 2026; Frank et al., 2025; Raja et al., 2026). These developments are redefining the boundaries between assistance and persuasion, preference fulfilment and commercial steering, delegated agency and autonomy displacement, and human choice and machine-mediated consumption (Song & Shin, 2024; Shahbaznezhad et al., 2021).
This Collection seeks to advance theoretically rigorous and managerially relevant research on generative and agentic AI. Its focus encompasses delegated consumer agency, customer experience, brand stewardship, market exchange, and sustainable market value. Agentic systems may reduce information-processing costs, enhance decision quality, improve marketplace accessibility, strengthen service responsiveness, and enable adaptive customer journeys (Arya, Purohit et al., 2026; Arya, Saraf et al., 2026). However, these systems may also restrict consideration sets, infer preferences without authorization integrity, privilege commercially advantageous alternatives, and intensify behavioural steering. They may further conceal the institutional incentives embedded within automated marketplace decisions (Kuanr et al., 2025; Shahbaznezhad & Rashidirad, 2021).
The central concern is not whether agentic AI is inherently beneficial or harmful. Rather, it concerns when, how, and for whom agentic marketing produces agency augmentation, algorithmic dependence, marketplace manipulation, or value erosion. This Collection encourages research that moves beyond conventional technology-adoption models and generalized trust measures. It seeks deeper analysis of how agentic intermediation redistributes decision rights, informational power, and market accountability. Relevant actors include consumers, brands, platforms, marketers, service employees, and autonomous AI agents.
Research should examine how agentic AI reshapes delegated consumer agency, decision authorship, brand stewardship, customer journeys, and multi-agent market ecologies. Although such systems can reduce cognitive burden and translate preferences into action (Gelbrich et al., 2026; Hassan et al., 2026), they may obscure alternative curation, sponsored influence, and the contestability or reversibility of decisions (Kuanr et al., 2025). Key issues include preference fidelity, autonomy displacement, commercial steering, algorithmic recourse, brand legitimacy, customer-based brand equity (Li et al., 2026), and algorithmic legibility across human and machine audiences.
Indicative Topics
- Agentic AI, delegated consumer agency, and the redistribution of marketplace decision rights
- AI-mediated personalization, synthetic persuasion, behavioral targeting, and commercial steering
- Consumer vulnerability, digital inclusion, accessibility, algorithmic discrimination, and marketplace fairness
- Agentic AI across customer journeys, omnichannel ecosystems, and phygital service environments
- Brand-controlled, platform-controlled, and consumer-controlled AI agents
- Brand authenticity, anthropomorphism, and emotional sensitivity in AI-mediated interactions
- Multi-agent market ecologies and autonomous brand–consumer negotiation
- Agentic AI in retailing, services, luxury, healthcare, tourism, B-2-B services, and quick-commerce platforms
- Sustainable customer experience, responsible innovation, and AI-enabled value co-creation
- Consumer autonomy, preference fidelity, decision authorship, and algorithmic contestability
- Trust calibration, automation bias, over-delegation, verification behavior, and post-error reliance
- Autonomous customer-journey orchestration, predictive service intervention, and agentic relationship management
- Machine-facing branding, algorithmic legibility, and brand discoverability in AI-mediated marketplaces
- Agent-to-agent commerce, automated price discovery, dynamic negotiation, and algorithmic market coordination
- New behavioral theories, computational methods, and societal metrics for evaluating agentic marketing, brand value, consumer well-being, and market legitimacy
The Collection welcomes conceptual, qualitative, quantitative, experimental, mixed-method, research. Studies integrating consumer responses, marketing strategy, AI governance, brand outcomes, and societal implications are particularly encouraged.
This Collection primarily supports and amplifies research related to SDG 12—Responsible Consumption and Production—by examining how agentic marketing can promote informed consumer choice, responsible brand stewardship, marketplace fairness, and sustainable value creation. It also contributes to SDG 9 through responsible AI innovation and to SDG 8 through sustainable productivity and human-centred customer-facing work.
References:
Alabed, A., Javornik, A., Gregory-Smith, D., & Casey, R. (2024). More than just a chat: A taxonomy of consumers’ relationships with conversational AI agents and their well-being implications. European Journal of Marketing, 58(2), 373-409.
Arya, V. (2026). When reality meets intelligence: Integrating ARIx attributes with spatial immersion, self-brand connection, and aesthetic experience to influence retail brand equity. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 90, 104693.
Arya, V., Purohit, S., & Frau, M. (2026). Navigating Brand Conscientiousness in the Metaverse: A Qualitative Study to Analyse the Ethical Dimensions for Virtual Stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 1-43.
Arya, V., Saraf, A., Chichkanov, N., Papa, A., & Romano, M. (2026). AI-enhanced competency transfer hubs: a conceptual framework for university-industry engagement and knowledge sharing. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 51(2), 682-712.
Bilgihan, A., Ostinelli, M., Lorenz, M., & Zhang, Y. (2026). The AI Agent in the Room: Rethinking Consumer Decision-Making in the Age of Autonomous AI. Psychology & Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.70165
Frank, D. A., Folwarczny, M., & Otterbring, T. (2025). Consumer acceptance of high-autonomy AI assistants is driven by perceived benefits in online shopping settings characterized by scarcity. Psychology & Marketing, 43, 538–555.
Gelbrich, K., Roschk, H., Miederer, S., &Kerath, A. (2026). Automated versushuman agents: A meta-analysis of customer responses to robots, chatbots, and algorithms and their contingencies. Journal of Marketing, 90(2), 1-26.
Hassan, N., Abdelraouf, M., & El-Shihy, D. (2025). The moderating role of personalized recommendations in the trust–satisfaction–loyalty relationship: An empirical study of AI-driven e-commerce. Future Business Journal, 11, 66.
Kuanr, A., Moharana, T. R., Yan, M., Pradhan,D., & El-Manstrly, D. (2025). When chatbots cause trouble: how agent type andconversation style shape consumer responses to service failures. European Journal of Marketing, 59(12), 2788-2839.
Li, Y., Lin, S., Gong, H., Wang, X., & Janiszewski, C. (2026). Time is shrinkingin the eye of AI: AI agents influence intertemporal choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 36(1), 59-77.
Raja, S. V. S., Orazi, D. C., Cheng, Y., & Belli, A. (2026). A meta-analysis of the effects of AI agent implementation on customer-level outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 210, 116172.
Shahbaznezhad, H., Dolan, R., & Rashidirad, M. (2021). The role of social media content format and platform in users’ engagement behavior. Journal of interactive marketing, 53(1), 47-65.
Shahbaznezhad, H., & Rashidirad, M. (2021). Exploring firms’ fan page behavior and users’ participation: evidence from airline industry on Twitter. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 29(6), 492-513.
Song, S. W., & Shin, M. (2024). Uncanny valley effects on chatbot trust, purchase intention, and adoption intention in the context of e-commerce: The moderating role of avatar familiarity. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 40, 441–456.
Publishing Model: Open Access
Deadline: May 17, 2027
Social Commerce, Influencers and Brand Community Dynamics
This Collection aims to advance our understanding of the roots of social commerce, the influential role of digital creators, and the interactions within brand communities. It emphasises the collective impact of these factors on consumer engagement, brand loyalty, and the evolving landscape of online interactions.
Social commerce has become an increasingly important aspect of the digital marketplace, creating new forms of interaction between consumers, brands, and online communities. As commercial activity becomes more integrated into social media platforms, understanding the roles of influencer marketing, electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM), and brand communities remains an important area of inquiry for business and management research.
A growing body of research highlights the influence of eWOM and online engagement on consumer attitudes and behaviours, including purchase intention and brand loyalty. Influencers play a prominent role in these processes by shaping brand perceptions, facilitating information exchange, and fostering relationships between brands and consumers. At the same time, brand communities provide spaces where consumers share experiences, generate content, and contribute to the development of brand meaning and value.
Important questions remain regarding the conditions under which social commerce initiatives are effective, how consumer trust is established and maintained, and how community dynamics influence customer experience and marketplace outcomes. The continued evolution of social media platforms, alongside emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence and augmented reality, provides further opportunities to examine changing patterns of consumer interaction and engagement.
This Collection also welcomes research that considers the broader economic implications of social commerce. By enabling new forms of digital entrepreneurship, creator-led business activity, and market participation, social commerce may contribute to United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth). Research examining these opportunities, as well as the challenges associated with equitable participation in digital marketplaces, is encouraged.
This Collection welcomes conceptual, empirical, and review articles that advance understanding of social commerce, influencer marketing, and brand community dynamics. We encourage contributions that offer theoretical insight, methodological innovation, or practical relevance for researchers and practitioners.
Topics of interest include, but are not limited to:
- The impact of eWOM on brand perception
- Influencer authenticity and consumer trust
- Strategies for building resilient brand communities
- Measuring the ROI of social commerce initiatives
- The role of customer experience in brand loyalty
- Psychological drivers of online engagement
- Digital storytelling in influencer marketing
By bringing together diverse perspectives on social commerce, influencers, and brand communities, this Collection aims to advance understanding of how social interactions shape contemporary consumer behaviour, brand-consumer relationships, and digital economic activity.
Publishing Model: Open Access
Deadline: Jun 08, 2027
