Understanding the knowledge gap in dental stem cell therapy
Published in Bioengineering & Biotechnology, Biomedical Research, and General & Internal Medicine
Dental stem cell therapy is often discussed as a potential direction in regenerative dentistry. Yet for me, this study was never only about stem cells, education, or professional attitudes. It was also about a practical question: how prepared are practicing dentists to understand, evaluate, and potentially adopt emerging regenerative approaches in real clinical settings?
This question became the starting point for our recently published article in BMC Medical Education. As a dentist and researcher working in regenerative dentistry and dental stem cells, I was interested not only in the scientific promise of dental stem cell therapy, but also in the educational gap that may shape how such therapies are understood by practicing clinicians.
In contexts where access to specialized training, institutional support, and regulatory guidance may be limited, understanding professional knowledge gaps becomes especially important. Scientific progress alone is not enough if clinicians do not have the educational tools needed to interpret and apply emerging therapies responsibly.
The study focused on Palestinian dentists and explored their knowledge, attitudes, perceived barriers, and willingness to adopt dental stem cell therapy. Using a cross-sectional, web-based survey, we assessed factual knowledge, adoption attitudes, ethical concerns, perceived obstacles, and interest in future education and training.
One of the clearest findings was that knowledge remained limited among many respondents, even though willingness to adopt dental stem cell therapy was relatively high. This contrast felt important to us. It suggested that there is genuine interest and openness toward innovation, but interest alone is not enough for safe and responsible implementation. Clinicians also need structured education, clear professional guidance, and access to evidence-based training.
The most commonly reported barrier was lack of knowledge, followed by cost and ethical concerns. These findings suggest that the challenge is not only scientific or technical. It is also educational, regulatory, and practical. For dental stem cell therapy to move responsibly toward clinical contexts, dentists need more than awareness; they need a clear understanding of indications, limitations, safety considerations, regulatory boundaries, and ethical responsibilities.
At the same time, we were careful not to overinterpret the findings. This was a cross-sectional survey, not a measure of clinical competence or actual adoption behavior. Recruitment was conducted through closed professional online groups, which may have reached dentists who were more digitally connected or more education-oriented. Therefore, the results should be interpreted as a context-specific snapshot of knowledge, attitudes, and perceived barriers among the surveyed Palestinian dentists, rather than as a definitive national assessment.
For me, the value of this work lies in highlighting a practical gap between scientific progress and professional readiness. Dental stem cell therapy may hold promise, but responsible translation requires education before implementation. Undergraduate curricula, continuing education programs, and clearer regulatory guidance may all play important roles in preparing dentists to engage with regenerative therapies in a safe and evidence-informed way.
I hope this study contributes to discussions around dental education, regenerative dentistry, and the responsible adoption of emerging therapies, especially in settings where access to specialized training and regulatory guidance may still be limited. Identifying educational gaps is not a small matter; it is one step toward supporting future healthcare education and preparedness.
Published article:
Zahedah R, Jaber M, Dinç B. Exploring the knowledge gap in dental stem cell therapy: educational challenges and adoption attitudes among Palestinian dentists. BMC Medical Education. 2026;26:535. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-08880-x
Follow the Topic
-
BMC Medical Education
This is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the education and training of healthcare professionals. It welcomes studies on students and professionals across all levels of education; education delivery aspects; and other education-related topics.
Related Collections
With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.
Lifelong learning and patient safety
BMC Medical Education is calling for submissions to our Collection, Lifelong learning and patient safety. As healthcare delivery becomes increasingly complex, shaped by biomedical advances, digital transformation, demographic shifts, and changing patient expectations, so does the potential for errors and adverse events. This phenomenon makes it essential to equip all healthcare professionals with training and tools to prioritize patient safety across different clinical environments.
Patient safety is a global health priority, with the World Health Organization identifying unsafe care as one of the leading causes of avoidable morbidity and mortality worldwide. While traditional models of competence, validated at a single point in time through licensure or certification, can be valuable, addressing this challenge requires a workforce that is continuously learning, adaptive, and equipped to respond to evolving patient safety threats. Lifelong learning in healthcare plays a pivotal role in fostering patient safety by making sure that healthcare professionals remain competent and adaptive to the best practices in the medical field. Outdated knowledge or skills in the medical field can directly jeopardize patient outcomes. Therefore, continuous professional development allows clinicians to update their professional competencies, reducing the risk of errors and adverse events.
This Collection invites research that examines how patient safety, which should be a professional expectation and ethical imperative at all stages of one’s career trajectory, can be enhanced through innovation in health professions education and training. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to:
• Tools and strategies for integrating patient safety into medical and nursing curricula
• Lifelong learning and continuing professional development (CPD) for patient safety and competence
• Simulation for teamwork, inclusion, and communication in diverse healthcare teams to enhance patient safety
• Interprofessional and collaborative safety culture
• Infection prevention and medication safety practices
• Learning from errors, near-misses, and real-time decision-making in clinical teams
• Strategies and policies for enhancing lifelong learning for patient safety
All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.
This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3: Good Health and Well-Being and SDG 4: Quality Education.
Publishing Model: Open Access
Deadline: Aug 18, 2026
Disability in medical education
BMC Medical Education welcomes submissions to our Disability in medical education Collection. As disability impacts so much of our patient population, medical curricula must evolve to address gaps in knowledge, attitudes, and clinical care. Incorporating disability-specific education strengthens inclusive education practices, reduces disparities, and prepares clinicians to deliver person-centered care. Innovative tools, assessments, and instructional approaches, from simulation training to standardized patient encounters to Universal Design for Learning, can be leveraged to improve learners’ understanding of access, communication, ethical, other considerations in clinical practice.
We welcome research covering topics including but not limited to:
• Development and integration of disability curriculum within medical education
• Teaching strategies that promote competency in caring for patients with disabilities
• The role of inclusive education and Universal Design for Learning in clinical training
• Evaluation tools and assessment methods for measuring disability-related knowledge and skills
• Use of patient narratives, simulation, and standardized patients with disabilities in clinical teaching
• Interprofessional education initiatives focused on accessibility and patient-centered care
• Addressing barriers within healthcare training environments
By emphasizing innovation and access, this work supports the development of a medical workforce equipped to deliver compassionate, equitable care for all patients.
All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.
This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 4: Quality Education and SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities.
Publishing Model: Open Access
Deadline: Sep 07, 2026
Please sign in or register for FREE
If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in