Willing, But Boxed In: What 383 Nigerian Pharmacists Told Us About Preventing Disease Before It Starts

Pharmacists, as accessible healthcare providers, are well-positioned to promote health and prevent diseases, but their potential remains underutilized. Our study assessed pharmacists’ health promotion strategies, identified predictors of behaviours, and examined challenges affecting implementation.
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Explore the Research

BioMed Central
BioMed Central BioMed Central

Health promotion strategies among pharmacists in Nigeria: perceptions, attitudes, and challenges - BMC Health Services Research

Background Nigeria faces a dual burden of communicable and non-communicable diseases, placing considerable strain on the healthcare system. Pharmacists, as accessible healthcare providers, are well-positioned to promote health and prevent diseases; however, their potential remains underutilized. This study assessed pharmacists’ health promotion strategies, perceptions, and attitudes, identified predictors of perception and attitude, and examined challenges affecting implementation. Methods A descriptive cross-sectional survey was conducted among 383 community and hospital pharmacists across Nigeria between December 2024 and April 2025 using convenience and snowball sampling. A structured questionnaire assessed socio-demographics, health promotion strategies, perceptions, attitudes, and barriers. Perception and attitude scores were categorized based on median values. Data were analysed using SPSS v27. Descriptive statistics summarized responses, while the Fisher–Freeman–Halton exact test and multiple linear regression identified associations and predictors of pharmacists’ perceptions and attitudes toward health promotion. Results Overall, 351 (91.6%) pharmacists reported participation in health promotion activities, particularly interprofessional collaboration (345, 98.3%) and adherence counselling (343, 97.7%). Most pharmacists had positive perception (375, 97.9%) and attitude (371, 96.9%) toward health promotion. Key barriers included lack of training (234, 61.1%), inadequate consultation space (251, 65.5%), and limited patient time (271, 70.8%). Significant predictors of perception and attitude included age, gender, years of experience, additional qualifications, location of practice, and geopolitical zone. Specifically, younger pharmacists (21–30 years) had higher perception (B = 1.18, p = 0.046) but lower attitude (B = − 2.27, p < 0.001) scores than those aged 31–40 years. Male pharmacists had lower perception scores than females (B = − 1.31, p = 0.010). Rural practitioners had lower perception (B = − 2.68, p < 0.001) but higher attitude (B = 1.79, p = 0.014) scores than urban counterparts. Pharmacists in North Central (B = 5.36, p = 0.030) and South West zones (B = 4.99, p = 0.042) demonstrated higher perception scores compared with North West practitioners while area of practice was not significantly associated with perception (p = 0.458) or attitude (p = 0.763). Conclusion Pharmacists in Nigeria demonstrated positive perception and attitude toward health promotion but faced systemic and resource challenges. Professional experience, qualifications, and geopolitical location significantly influenced the pharmacists’ perception and attitude. Targeted training, policy support, and infrastructural investment are essential to enhance pharmacists’ contribution to preventive healthcare and public health. Clinical trial number Not applicable.

The pharmacist you walk past every day

Picture the pharmacy nearest to you. Maybe it's a small shop on a busy street corner, or a counter inside a hospital. Chances are, you've been there for one reason: to pick up a prescription. In and out. Transactional.

But what if that same pharmacist could do more such as screen you for high blood pressure while you wait, talk you through quitting smoking, or catch early warning signs of diabetes before it becomes a crisis? In many countries, this is already happening. In Nigeria, it mostly isn't. Not because pharmacists don't want to but because almost everything around them makes it hard.

That gap, between what pharmacists are willing to do and what the system lets them do, is what our team set out to measure.

Why this matters right now

Nigeria is dealing with a health burden most countries only face one side of at a time. Infectious diseases like malaria and tuberculosis haven't gone away, but on top of that, non-communicable diseases such as hypertension, diabetes, cancer, heart disease are climbing fast. Hospitals and clinics are stretched thin trying to treat both.

Health promotion is one of the most cost-effective tools available anywhere in the world. And pharmacists are, in theory, perfectly placed to deliver it. They're everywhere. People trust them. And unlike a doctor's appointment, walking into a pharmacy doesn't require booking weeks in advance.

The problem is that no one had really asked, at a national level, Nigerian pharmacists themselves: are you doing this work? Do you want to? And what's standing in your way?

What we did

Between December 2024 and April 2025, we surveyed 383 community and hospital pharmacists from across Nigeria. We asked about the health promotion activities they were already doing, how they felt about that role, and what got in the way.

Pharmacists across all six of Nigeria's geopolitical zones took part, giving us a rare, genuinely national picture.

What we found

Pharmacists are already showing up. 91.6% of the pharmacists we surveyed said they were actively involved in some form of health promotion, mostly counselling patients on taking their medication correctly (97.7%) and working alongside doctors and nurses (98.3%). This isn't a profession waiting to be convinced. It's a profession already leaning in.

They believe in the work. Almost everyone we surveyed — 97.9% — had a positive perception of health promotion, and 96.9% had a positive attitude toward doing it. Most rejected the old idea that prevention is "a doctor's job" or "a nurse's job." Many specifically pointed out that screening people in the pharmacy for things like high blood pressure or diabetes could meaningfully reduce heart disease down the line.

But the system isn't built for it. Here's where the story turns. Despite all that enthusiasm:

  • 61.1% said they simply hadn't been trained to do it properly.
  • 65.5% had no private space to have these conversations with patients.
  • 70.8% said patients themselves didn't have time to engage.
  • 72.9% cited a lack of funding, and 74.7% pointed to medicine or supply shortages getting in the way.

In other words, the will is there. The infrastructure isn't.

One quiet gap stood out. While pharmacists were confident talking about medication and lifestyle changes, only 71.2% were involved in mental health support  noticeably lower than almost every other activity we measured. That's worth paying attention to, given how much unmet mental health need exists globally, and how often a pharmacy visit might be someone's only regular contact with the health system.

Who you are shapes how you see the role. A few patterns emerged that surprised us. Younger pharmacists (21–30) felt more confident in the idea of health promotion but were less sure of their readiness to actually deliver it almost the opposite of what you might expect. Pharmacists with more years of experience, by contrast, felt more ready, even if their initial enthusiasm had mellowed. And pharmacists working in rural areas had a more guarded view of the role overall, yet a stronger personal motivation to do it anyway, suggesting real grit in the face of harder working conditions. Interestingly, whether someone worked in a community pharmacy or a hospital pharmacy made almost no difference at all, as the barriers and the willingness cut across both settings.

Why this matters beyond pharmacy

This isn't just a study about pharmacists. It's a study about an underused resource sitting in plain sight. If a country wants to get serious about preventing disease rather than only treating it, it needs to invest in the people patients already trust and already visit not just build new programs from scratch.

Concretely, that means incorporating practical health-promotion training into pharmacy education; giving pharmacies the physical space and tools (even something as simple as a blood pressure cuff and a private corner) to have these conversations; and having national bodies like the Pharmacy Council of Nigeria formally build pharmacists into disease-prevention strategy.

The takeaway

The pharmacists in this study are ready. The barrier is training, space, time, and policy. Fix those, and Nigeria has an army of accessible, trusted health workers already standing in every neighborhood, ready to help people stay well rather than only treating them once they're sick.

Read the full open-access paper here: [https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-14217-7]

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Health Promotion and Disease Prevention
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Public Health > Health Promotion and Disease Prevention
Public Health
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Public Health
Social Perception
Humanities and Social Sciences > Behavioral Sciences and Psychology > Social Psychology > Social Perception
Attitudes
Humanities and Social Sciences > Behavioral Sciences and Psychology > Social Psychology > Attitudes
Global Health
Humanities and Social Sciences > Society > Sociology > Health, Medicine and Society > Global Health
Health Policy
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Public Health > Health Policy

Related Collections

With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Patients' knowledge of the indications for their medications

BMC Health Services Research is calling for submissions to our Collection on Patients' knowledge of the indications for their medications.

Understanding the indications for prescribed medications is crucial for patient safety and effective healthcare delivery. Many patients lack adequate knowledge about their medications, which can lead to non-adherence, adverse drug reactions, and suboptimal health outcomes. This Collection invites research that examines the extent of patients' medication knowledge, the factors influencing their understanding, and the implications for healthcare practice. By exploring these aspects, we aim to illuminate the gaps in medication literacy and the importance of patient engagement in their treatment regimens.

Enhancing patients' knowledge of their medications is vital for fostering informed decision-making and promoting adherence to treatment plans. Recent advances in medication counseling, patient education programs, and digital health technologies have shown promise in improving medication awareness. These interventions not only empower patients but also support healthcare providers in delivering personalized care. By fostering a culture of medication literacy, healthcare systems can enhance patient outcomes and reduce the burden of medication-related issues.

Topics for submission:

Assessing medication literacy in diverse populations

Barriers and facilitators to understanding medication indications

Impact of patient education and other related interventions on medication adherence

Tools, interventions and strategies for enhancing patient medication knowledge

Understand how, why for whom and under what circumstances interventions to enhance medication knowledge work or not

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being).

All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Sep 30, 2026

Measuring, understanding, and mitigating inequities in health workforce distribution in low- and middle income countries

Global health workforce shortages are exacerbated by within-country maldistribution of health workers, preventing people from accessing quality healthcare in a timely manner. These disparities are especially acute in low- and middle-income countries whose fragile health systems are transitioning towards universal health coverage.

This article collection aims to shed light on this topic – specifically focusing on within-country health workforce maldistribution and public and private sector efforts to address this issue. Quantitative and qualitative articles measuring national and subnational geographic, socio-cultural, and other inequities of health workforce training, education, and distribution; policy analyses, process evaluation, and impact evaluation of health workforce deployment and retention programs; as well as case studies and intervention studies of best practices to address health workforce maldistributions are welcome. Reviews on this topic are also welcome.

Studies should be conducted in a low- and middle-income country/countries, and authors from low- and middle-income countries are especially encouraged to submit.

Topics of collection:

  • Health workforce training and education
  • Health workforce distribution
  • Health workforce deployment and retention programs
  • Health workforce policy reform

All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Nov 27, 2026