Cookies
We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website. You can decide for yourself which categories you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available.
Further information can be found in our privacy policy.
Cookie Control
Customise your preferences for any tracking technology
The following allows you to customize your consent preferences for any tracking technology used to help us achieve the features and activities described below. To learn more about how these trackers help us and how they work, refer to the cookie policy. You may review and change your preferences at any time.
These trackers are used for activities that are strictly necessary to operate or deliver the service you requested from us and, therefore, do not require you to consent.
These trackers help us to deliver personalized marketing content and to operate, serve and track ads.
These trackers help us to deliver personalized marketing content to you based on your behaviour and to operate, serve and track social advertising.
These trackers help us to measure traffic and analyze your behaviour with the goal of improving our service.
These trackers help us to provide a personalized user experience by improving the quality of your preference management options, and by enabling the interaction with external networks and platforms.
Recent Comments
Timothy, I've been following this controversy for a while. I'm curious, have you and/or your colleagues ever contacted Munday and/or his colleagues to arrange a methodological get-together? The objective would be to let them "teach" you how they do their experiments. Let them look on as you use their techniques. Ask them to collaborate with you so that you can attain your goal of investigating the mechanisms of these phenomena; this goal is obviously a very cool research objective. A good-faith coming together would really help the rest of us figure out what the heck is going on. Is this even a possibility, or is there too much water over the dam? My point is that if you all can somehow figure out a way to work on this together, it would very much help the rest of us consider the biology, and plan our own experiments. I am assuming this collaboration I am inviting you to consider would be rocky; but perhaps you can convince yourselves and the Munday collaborators what most of us think: the biology is actually more important than the reputations.
Sorry William, I've never checked back on this site so I'm just seeing your comment now. We did indeed approach the Munday group on several occasions, expressing interest in viewing some of their experimental trials so we could see the incredibly large effects with our own eyes. The response was always the same - those experiments were performed behind closed doors by specific people, so it was not possible for us to see. We did receive an offer for them to conduct the behavioural trials on our behalf (behind closed doors) if we wanted to collaborate, yet that was not a desirable option for us. The only avenue for us was to run the experiments ourselves. We discovered that many of the experimental approaches reported in the Munday group papers simply didn't work, so we improved on everything to maximise robustness and transparency. I hope that helps to address your queries. There's also an article in Science that may help to shed more light onto what's going on here: https://www.science.org/content/article/does-ocean-acidification-alter-fish-behavior-fraud-allegations-create-sea-doubt