We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website. You can decide for yourself which categories you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available.
Further information can be found in our privacy policy.
Recent Comments
I have just submitted my CV and a list of topics related to imaging, as seen through the eyes of a medical oncologist with a long-standing interest in that field. One issue that concerns me about being a reviewer is the time devoted to a review. I find myself frequently having to download many of the references in the submitted manuscript. Sometimes, the reason is a lack of certainty that the authors have accurately quoted the reference in question. At other times, it relates to my own desire to know more. I hope that with my other obligations, I can still perform at least one solid review per month. What I believe would be helpful for reviewers like myself is for journals to offer CME credits for such work. A challenging issue in this regard is that I often encounter publications where I wonder, "did the reviewer actually spend time doing his job?"
Dear dr. Strum,
Many thanks for your interest to contribute to our Journal and for your insightful considerations.
This is to confirm that your CV has been received and your application will be carefully evaluated by the EiC.
Kind regards,
Barbara Pedrotti