Cervical Screening Awareness Week

In recognition of Cervical Screening Awareness Week (17-23 June), we talked to Dr. Franco Maria Buonaguro and Dr. Maria Lina Tornesello, Editors-in-Chief of Infectious Agents and Cancer
Cervical Screening Awareness Week
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Starting from the WHO campaign 90-70-90 for HPV-related tumors, read our Q&A to learn how we can all contribute to supporting cancer early screening and reducing cases

What is the meaning of WHO campaign 90-70 -90 targets towards elimination of Cervical Cancer?

90% of girls fully vaccinated with the HPV vaccine by the age of 15; 70% of women screened using a high-performance test by the age of 35, and again by the age of 45; 90% of women with pre-cancer treated and 90% of women with invasive cancer managed.

What is the current screening strategy recommended by WHO?

In general population screening priority every 5 years is between 30-49 years’ range with HPV screening (and partial genotyping), followed by dual-stain (p16/Ki-67) cytological triage and treatment in the first 6 months after positivity; in HIV-positive population screening priority every 3-5 years is between 25-49  years’ range with HPV screening, triage and treatment;

What is the POC strategy pursued by various institutions, including the NIH? What could be the Pros and Cons?

The POC strategy consists of a single combined visit for diagnosis and treatment. The diagnosis, depending on different programs, combines HPV screening and VIA (visual inspection with acetic acid) followed by immediate treatment. Pros would be the treatment of all diagnosed patients, with minimal loss to follow-up of positive cases. Cons could be the overtreatment of doubtful cases as well as the undertreatment of subject with modest clinical lesions.


 

Such recommendations, which represent minimum/simplified global achievements, could be articulated into more complex diagnostic algorithms, as detailed in the WHO guidelines

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Research Communities by Springer Nature, please sign in

Follow the Topic

Biomedical Research
Life Sciences > Health Sciences > Biomedical Research
Cancer Prevention
Life Sciences > Biological Sciences > Cancer Biology > Cancer Prevention
Cancer Screening
Life Sciences > Biological Sciences > Cancer Biology > Cancer Screening
Gynaecological Cancer
Life Sciences > Biological Sciences > Cancer Biology > Cancers > Gynaecological Cancer
SDG 3: Good Health & Wellbeing
Research Communities > Community > Sustainability > UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) > SDG 3: Good Health & Wellbeing
SDG 1: No Poverty
Research Communities > Community > Sustainability > UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) > SDG 1: No Poverty

Related Collections

With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Point-of-Care (POC) for HPV-related genital cancers

Point-of-Care (POC) or Point-of-Care Testing (POCT) have been generally intended for rapid diagnostic testing (less than 90 minutes) to detect and diagnose infectious diseases quickly, close to the patient-healthcare interface. The COVID-19 pandemic has underlined the potential uses of POCT devices on a large scale to detect infectious diseases and for public health risk management as well as protecting fragile cancer patients. The study and the implementation of POC for HPV-based screening is stretching out to its current maximum potential the concept of rapid diagnosis of chronic infectious disease, with risk of cancer progression, to include clinical validation and treatment, to provide each woman, also in LMICs, with the possibility of effective secondary prevention of cervical cancer. In the last 5 years, the Infectious Agents and Cancer journal hosted some paradigmatic pieces of the scientific debate on HPV screening in sub-Saharan Africa (Mungo 2024, Dreyer 2024; Parhm 2023; Moyo 2023; Desai 2020; Onyango 2020). This collection is willing to highlight the richness of the debate, presenting the results and focusing on the open questions. These start from how to reach the women who mostly can benefit from screening, increasing their awareness, health literacy and, finally, participation in screening, including the opportunity of introducing self-sampling and how to propose it. The main barrier to a massive screening in LMIC is still the cost of the intervention, researchers are working to develop and validate HPV assays that are sustainable and feasible as POCT, possibly clinically validated also on self-sample. The one-step screening needs to rapidly identify women that can deserve treatment possibly avoiding histological assessment. Studies are investigating the best triage strategies to stratify women according to their risk of CIN3+. Accurate triage and risk stratification also open the question of how to manage woman who are HPV-positive and triage-negative; these women finitely do not deserve treatment but have a high risk of CIN3+ in the future. Defining appropriate, feasible, and acceptable follow up strategies for these women is a new research need. The collection of the included studies goes from the laboratory to the community, from the validation of new molecular methods to capacity building of professionals and community involvement.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Ongoing

AIDS and Cancer from an African perspective

This cross-journal Collection's focus on Africa stems from the pressing need to address the unique cancer challenges and opportunities on the continent. Despite the growing body of research emerging from Africa, there is a lack of specialized platforms dedicated to showcasing this work. This new collection aims to fill that gap by providing a dedicated venue for African oncology research, highlighting regional innovations, and promoting collaboration between African researchers and the global scientific community. By focusing on Africa, the collection will ensure that the continent's specific challenges—such as culturally tailored interventions, resource constraints, and local public health strategies—receive the in-depth attention they deserve.This targeted approach not only meets an unmet need in the scientific publishing landscape but also has the potential to significantly advance cancer research and care across Africa, making it a crucial addition to the field. Manuscripts addressing other aspects of HIV disease will not be included as our goal is to better understand cancer in African people living with HIV (PLWH).

All submissions in this collection undergo the journal’s standard peer review process. Similarly, all manuscripts authored by a Guest Editor(s) will be handled by the Editor-in-Chief. As an open access publication, this journal levies an article processing fee (details here). We recognize that many key stakeholders may not have access to such resources and are committed to supporting participation in this issue wherever resources are a barrier. For more information about what support may be available, please visit OA funding and support, or email OAfundingpolicy@springernature.com or the Editor-in-Chief.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Ongoing