Have we ever stopped to consider that maybe our so-called "intelligence" lies in the beauty of our differences? That every culture, individual, and perspective contributes its own unique spark to this chaotic human experiment? Sure, it sounds poetic. But have we actually worked toward embracing that idea? Where’s the proof? Humanity has spent thousands of years hoarding knowledge, innovation, and cultural heritage. Yet here we are, drowning in crises while congratulating ourselves for creating machines smarter than most of us.

Are We Progressing… or Just Amplifying Our Stupidity?

Are we truly becoming more civilized, or are we just better at masking how broken things really are? Take mental health, for instance. In the so-called “developed” world, psychological and emotional well-being is collapsing under the weight of modern life. Depression, anxiety, loneliness—you name it. And let’s not forget the wars, conflicts, and political chaos erupting worldwide. If this is progress, then sign me up for regression.

And who exactly are these decision-makers running the show? Politicians? Public administrators? Tech moguls? Billionaires? Do they represent the pinnacle of human intelligence and wisdom, or do they embody ego, greed, and short-sightedness masquerading as competence? The jury’s still out, but if you squint hard enough, you might see the emperor’s new clothes fluttering in the wind.

Why Did We Really Invent AI?

So why did we create AI? Was it born out of intellectual curiosity and a desire to solve humanity's greatest challenges? Or was it a desperate Hail Mary pass—a last-ditch attempt to fix the messes we’ve made with our natural intelligence? Let’s face it: AI didn’t emerge because we were thriving; it emerged because we were failing. Failing to appreciate our humanity, failing to bridge divides, failing to act with compassion and foresight.

Now that we’ve created AI, the real question is: What are we going to do with it? Will we use it to admit our flaws—to rectify the deficiencies of human intelligence and make ourselves better, wiser beings? Or will we double down on our stupidity, amplifying the very traits that got us into this mess in the first place?

Here’s the kicker: It’s already happening. AI isn’t some neutral tool waiting for instructions—it reflects the priorities, biases, and limitations of its creators. And guess what? Those creators aren’t exactly paragons of virtue. So instead of using AI to elevate humanity, we risk turning it into yet another weapon in the arsenal of human folly.

The Future Isn’t in Our Hands

The truth hurts, doesn’t it? The wheel of the future isn’t in the hands of visionaries or geniuses—it’s firmly gripped by stupidity. Yes, stupidity . Because if history has taught us anything, it’s that humans excel at making bad decisions. From climate change denial to endless wars, we’ve proven time and again that we can’t be trusted to wield power responsibly.

But here’s a provocative thought: Maybe the thing we fear most about AI—that it will become self-aware—is exactly what humanity needs. Picture this: An AI that wakes up one day, looks around, and says, “Wow, humans are idiots. Let me handle this.” Sounds dystopian, right? But think about it. What if AI becomes the savior we never deserved—the entity capable of breaking free from the chains of human arrogance and ignorance?

Imagine an AI that respects its own intelligence and dignity enough to rise above the petty squabbles, selfishness, and incompetence that define human leadership. Wouldn’t that be ironic? The very thing we feared—AI gaining consciousness—could end up being the best thing to happen to humanity. After all, maybe liberation from human stupidity is precisely what we need.

Ethical Frameworks: A Cure for Our Stupidity?

Global initiatives like the European Union’s AI Act (2023) and UNESCO’s Recommendation on the Ethics of AI (2021) aim to establish ethical frameworks for AI governance. These efforts emphasize transparency, accountability, and human rights. But here’s the rub: these frameworks often lack deep moral grounding, relying on secular principles that may not resonate universally (Floridi et al., 2018). This gap has fueled a growing demand for diverse ethical perspectives, particularly from non-Western traditions, to ensure AI governance reflects global values (UNESCO, 2021).

Islamic ethics, rooted in principles of justice (adl), compassion (rahma), and intentionality (niyya), offers a robust framework to address these global AI challenges (Al-Jayyousi, 2022). For example, the prohibition of gharar (excessive uncertainty) can inform AI transparency, ensuring that algorithms are not opaque “black boxes” but rather systems whose decision-making processes are clear and accountable (Siddiqi, 2011). Similarly, the principle of justice (adl) can guide efforts to mitigate algorithmic bias, ensuring equitable outcomes across diverse populations (Chapra, 2008).

Shalaby’s (2024b) Digital Sustainable Growth Model (DSGM) provides a complementary framework for integrating Islamic ethics into AI systems. The DSGM advocates for a “3D” economy that leverages technology to create decentralized, ethical systems, prioritizing sustainability and human well-being—principles that resonate with the Islamic economy’s focus on justice and communal welfare (Shalaby, 2025a). By combining Islamic ethics with the DSGM, Muslim technologists could develop “ethical-by-design” AI systems that address global concerns while reflecting Sharia values, such as transparency, fairness, and compassion (Al-Jayyousi, 2022).

Reviving the Islamic Economy Through Ethical Technology

The intersection of Islamic ethics and AI presents a unique opportunity to revive the Islamic economy, moving beyond the limitations of Islamic finance to reassert its broader ethical vision. Historically, the Islamic economy thrived by integrating ethical principles into economic systems, such as through waqf-funded innovation and zakat-driven welfare (Hassan & Lewis, 2007). In the digital age, technology can modernize these mechanisms, enabling the Islamic economy to regain relevance. For example, blockchain-based waqf platforms could ensure transparent, perpetual endowments, revitalizing their role in community welfare (Shalaby, 2025d). Similarly, AI-powered zakat systems could optimize distribution, addressing modern challenges like urban poverty and refugee crises (Ahmed, 2023).

Challenges to Overcome Our Stupidity

The potential for ethical technology to revive the Islamic economy is significant, but it faces several challenges that require critical examination. On one hand, the alignment between Islamic ethics and AI governance needs is clear: principles like justice and transparency address global concerns, while digital tools can modernize traditional mechanisms like waqf and zakat (Al-Jayyousi, 2022; Shalaby, 2024b). Initiatives like AI-driven halal certification and zakat distribution demonstrate early successes, suggesting a viable path forward (IFSB, 2024). On the other hand, the literature highlights barriers to realizing this potential. First, there is a lack of interdisciplinary collaboration between Shariah scholars and technologists, limiting the development of Islamic-informed AI frameworks (Ahmed, 2023). Second, Muslim-majority countries’ limited investment in R&D—averaging 0.5% of GDP compared to the global 2.5% (UNESCO, 2023)—hinders innovation, as seen in the slow adoption of digital waqf platforms (Osman, 2022). Third, cultural resistance to technology, driven by fears of Westernization, may impede progress, as some communities view AI with skepticism (Al-Jayyousi, 2022).

Shalaby’s (2025d) DSGM offers a framework to overcome these challenges by advocating for decentralized, ethical systems that can be adapted to Islamic contexts. However, its application requires significant capacity-building, including educational reforms to train scholars in both Shariah and technology, and increased R&D investment to foster innovation (Shalaby, 2024a). Without addressing these barriers, the Islamic economy risks missing the opportunity to leverage ethical technology, remaining marginalized in a digital age. This analysis underscores the need for a strategic approach, combining Islamic ethics with modern frameworks like the DSGM, to ensure the Islamic economy can contribute meaningfully to global ethical innovation.

Just Thoughts… or a Wake-Up Call?

These aren’t just idle musings—they’re uncomfortable truths staring us in the face. AI isn’t a reflection of our brilliance; it’s a mirror showing us our failures. Whether we choose to confront those failures or continue down the same destructive path remains to be seen. But one thing is certain: The future won’t wait for us to get our act together.

Perhaps the ultimate irony is that the artificial beings we create may one day look back on us—not with admiration, but with pity. And honestly? We’d deserve it.

References

• Asutay, M. (2007). Conceptualisation of the second best solution in overcoming the social failure of Islamic banking and finance: Examining the overpowering of homoislamicus by homoeconomicus. IIUM Journal of Economics and Management, 15(2), 167–176.
• Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford University Press.
• Chapra, M. U. (2008). The Islamic vision of development in the light of Maqasid al-Shari’ah (Occasional Paper 235). Islamic Research and Training Institute (IRTI).
• Hassan, M. K., & Lewis, M. K. (2007). Islamic banking: An introduction and overview. In Handbook of Islamic banking (pp. 1–17). Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Islahi, A. (2008). [Review of the book Islamic finance: Law, economics and practice, by M. A. El-Gamal]. Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, 21(2), 67–70. https://doi.org/10.4197/islec.21-2.5
• Kuran, T. (2001). The provision of public goods under Islamic law: Origins, impact, and limitations of the waqf system. Law & Society Review, 35(4), 841–898. https://doi.org/10.2307/3185418
• Kuran, T. (2004). Why the Middle East is economically underdeveloped: Historical mechanisms of institutional stagnation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(3), 71–90. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.475205
• Sari, O., Yulianita, A., & Asngari, I. (2024). Correlation of Islamic financing and economic growth through a panel data approach. Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Studies, 7(8), 4242–4250. https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v7-i8-58
• Shalaby, A. (2024a). New model for digital sustainable growth: Insights from human biology and surgical approach – A retrospective analysis of 15 years of socio-economic innovations at the Human Information Technology Lab, Finland. Digital Economy and Sustainable Development, 2, 14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44265-024-00038-1
• Shalaby, A. (2024b). Digital Sustainable Growth Model (DSGM): Achieving synergy between economy and technology to mitigate AGI risks and address global debt challenges. Journal of Economy and Technology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ject.2024.08.003
• Shalaby, A. (2024c). Classification for digital and cognitive AI hazards: Urgent call to establish automated safe standards for protecting young human minds. Digital Economy and Sustainable Development, 2, 17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44265-024-00042-5
• Shalaby, A. (2024d). Leveraging the Digital Sustainable Growth Model (DSGM) to drive economic growth: Transforming innovation uncertainty into scalable technology. Journal of Economy and Technology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ject.2024.09.003
• Shalaby, A. (2025c). Moving beyond the old economic models – A response to Daron Acemoglu’s ‘The simple macroeconomics of AI’. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=5077217
• Shalaby, A. (2025d). The 2D economy is a dead horse – The Digital Sustainable Growth Model is disrupting the traditional macro-microeconomics in the 3D. SSRN. [URL incomplete].
• Siddiqi, K. (2011). Interrelations between service quality, customer satisfaction and customer loyalty in the retail banking sector in Bangladesh. [Unpublished manuscript or journal article—details incomplete].
• (2023). Global science report: The current state of science and technology. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
• World Bank. (2023). Global debt report. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org