Sleep health is a critical yet often overlooked aspect of overall well-being, particularly in the context of primary care. Sleep disorders, including insomnia and obstructive sleep apnea, can significantly impact patients' physical and mental health, leading to complications that may complicate primary care management. Sleep issues are becoming increasingly recognized for their chronicity, widespread prevalence, and influence on other chronic conditions. Therefore, understanding the relationship between sleep health and primary care practices is vital. This Collection aims to explore the intersection of sleep health and primary care, shedding light on innovative approaches to assessment and treatment.

Continued exploration in this area could pave the way for groundbreaking advancements in the management of sleep health care within primary care settings. As more research is conducted, we may see innovative approaches to screening and treating sleep disorders that can assist primary care providers in addressing these issues more effectively and efficiently. Future studies may also illuminate the impact of sleep health on chronic disease prevention and management, ultimately leading to a more holistic approach to patient care. By enhancing sleep health awareness among primary care providers, we can promote comprehensive care that acknowledges the crucial role of sleep.

We invite submissions on a range of topics that include, but are not limited to:

• Management of insomnia in primary care
• Management of obstructive sleep apnea in primary care
• The intersection between sleep disturbances and chronic disease
• Integrated behavioral health approaches to the management of sleep disorders
• Screening tools for sleep disorders in primary care
• Implementation of new models of care for sleep disorders

This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being.

All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into primary care is rapidly transforming healthcare delivery, enabling more personalized, efficient, and effective patient care. However, the ethical and regulatory challenges associated with the deployment of AI technologies in this context are multifaceted and require thorough examination. Issues such as patient privacy, data protection, informed consent, and the potential for algorithmic bias are at the forefront of discussions surrounding AI's role in healthcare. As AI systems increasingly influence clinical decision-making, understanding the ethical frameworks and regulatory requirements governing their use is essential for safeguarding patient rights and ensuring equitable access to healthcare services.

The significance of addressing the ethical and regulatory dimensions of AI in primary care lies in its potential to enhance patient trust and ensure that AI applications are developed and implemented responsibly. Recent advancements in AI have demonstrated its capabilities in improving diagnostic accuracy and streamlining administrative tasks; however, these benefits must be balanced with robust protections for patient data and ethical considerations regarding decision-making. Furthermore, the lack of comprehensive regulations can lead to inconsistencies in AI application and misuse, which could undermine public confidence in these technologies.

In this Collection, we welcome submissions that span a wide array of topics, including but not limited to:

• Ethical considerations in AI applications
• Data protection and patient privacy in AI
• Informed consent processes for AI use
• Regulatory frameworks for AI in primary care

All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.