Improving soybean yield and oil productivity: an integrated nutrient management approach for sustainable soybean production

Enhancing soybean yield and oil productivity is vital for sustainable agriculture. An integrated nutrient management approach, combining organic and inorganic inputs, optimizes soil fertility, boosts crop performance, and ensures long-term sustainability of soybean production.
Improving soybean yield and oil productivity: an integrated nutrient management approach for sustainable soybean production
Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

Explore the Research

BioMed Central
BioMed Central BioMed Central

Improving soybean yield and oil productivity: an integrated nutrient management approach for sustainable soybean production - BMC Plant Biology

The increasing demand for oilseed crops like soybeans requires sustainable cultivation practices that not only boost productivity but also maintain the long-term health of soil and the environment. This research aimed to investigate the impact of an integrated nutrient management strategy, which includes organic sources (compost types), phosphorus management, and inoculation with phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB), on soybean productivity and profitability. Furthermore, the study examined the response of soybeans to varying potassium levels and different types of compost under both irrigated and dryland conditions. Two separate field experiments were conducted, with and without PSB seed inoculation, to evaluate various parameters including yield components, seed quality, protein and oil contents, grain yield, and growers’ income. The results demonstrated that the application of sole poultry manure compost significantly improved yield components, grain yield (3064 kg ha−1), protein yield (771 kg ha−1), and oil yield (546 kg ha−1). Application of the highest P level (90 kg P ha−1) produced the maximum grain yield (3222 kg ha−1), protein yield (823 kg ha−1), and oil yield (588 kg ha−1). Furthermore, plots treated with PSB exhibited higher yield components, grain yield (3051 kg ha−1), protein yield (769 kg ha−1) and oil yield (550 kg ha−1). Moreover, increasing phosphorus levels in conjunction with poultry manure compost or a combination of poultry + cattle manure composts resulted in improved yield components, protein and oil yields, and grain yield. In another aspect of the study, the response of soybean to potassium levels and different compost types under irrigated and dryland conditions was assessed. The findings revealed that higher potassium level (90 kg K ha−1) significantly increased yield components and produced the maximum grain yield (3189 kg ha−1), protein yield (725 kg ha−1), and oil yield (574 kg ha−1). Additionally, the application of sole poultry manure compost increased all yield components, grain yield (3160 kg ha−1), protein yield (719 kg ha−1), and oil yield (569 kg ha−1). Moreover, the irrigated plots demonstrated higher yield components, grain yield (2981 kg ha−1), protein yield (680 kg ha−1) and oil yield (536 kg ha−1). In conclusion, this research emphasizes the significance of an integrated nutrient management approach, incorporating compost, potassium, phosphorus, and phosphate solubilizing bacteria in enhancing soybean productivity and profitability.

Introduction

As global food demand continues to rise, the importance of sustainable agricultural practices becomes increasingly urgent. Among the essential crops contributing to food security, soybean (Glycine max) stands out as a vital source of protein and edible oil for both human and animal consumption. With its multifaceted utility in food products, feed, and industrial applications, soybean plays a critical role in the global agricultural economy.

Yet, despite its importance, soybean productivity in many regions remains suboptimal due to declining soil fertility, imbalanced nutrient use, and the unsustainable over-reliance on chemical fertilizers. These challenges are compounded by the adverse effects of climate change and land degradation. In this context, Integrated Nutrient Management (INM) emerges as a strategic, science-based approach to not only improve soybean yield and oil quality but also to foster long-term agricultural sustainability.


What is Integrated Nutrient Management (INM)?

Integrated Nutrient Management is the practice of optimally combining organic, inorganic, and biological sources of plant nutrients to maintain or improve soil fertility and crop productivity. It emphasizes the balanced and site-specific application of:

  • Chemical fertilizers (e.g., nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium),

  • Organic manures (e.g., compost, farmyard manure),

  • Biofertilizers (e.g., Rhizobium, phosphate-solubilizing bacteria, mycorrhizae),

  • And in modern contexts, emerging tools like nanofertilizers and precision nutrient application technologies.

The goal of INM is to ensure that crops receive the right nutrient sources, in the right amounts, at the right time, and in the right manner—often referred to as the 4R Nutrient Stewardship principle (Right Source, Right Rate, Right Time, Right Place).


Why Focus on Soybean?

Soybean has a unique role in agriculture due to its nitrogen-fixing ability, thanks to its symbiotic relationship with Rhizobium bacteria, which reduces the need for nitrogen fertilizers. However, other nutrients like phosphorus, potassium, sulfur, and micronutrients are still crucial for optimal growth, flowering, pod development, and oil synthesis.

Additionally, soybean oil is one of the most consumed vegetable oils worldwide. Improving both yield and oil content is essential to meet increasing demands and ensure that soybean production remains profitable and competitive.


The Benefits of INM in Soybean Cultivation

  1. Enhanced Yield and Oil Quality
    Multiple studies have demonstrated that integrated nutrient application results in higher and more consistent soybean yields compared to exclusive reliance on either organic or chemical inputs. Biofertilizers improve root health and nutrient uptake, while compost and manures enhance soil organic matter and microbial activity, both of which contribute to better grain and oil quality.

  2. Improved Nutrient Use Efficiency (NUE)
    INM optimizes the timing and form of nutrient delivery, reducing nutrient losses due to leaching, volatilization, or runoff. This leads to improved nutrient use efficiency, meaning more of the applied nutrients are taken up by the plant rather than lost to the environment.

  3. Soil Health and Fertility Restoration
    Continuous application of only chemical fertilizers has led to soil acidification, compaction, and biological degradation in many regions. Integrating organic and biological sources replenishes soil carbon, enhances microbial biodiversity, and improves soil structure, aeration, and water retention—key components of long-term soil fertility.

  4. Reduced Environmental Impact
    Excessive use of synthetic fertilizers contributes to greenhouse gas emissions, eutrophication of water bodies, and soil toxicity. INM reduces these risks by lowering chemical dependency and promoting eco-friendly alternatives.

  5. Cost-Effective and Farmer-Friendly
    Incorporating farm-produced compost or locally available biofertilizers can reduce input costs. Moreover, improving yield stability and soil health translates into better returns over time, especially for smallholder farmers.


Relevance in the Era of Climate Change

Agriculture is both a victim and contributor to climate change. Extreme weather, erratic rainfall, and rising temperatures affect crop productivity and soil quality. On the other hand, unsustainable practices, including over-fertilization, contribute significantly to greenhouse gas emissions (e.g., nitrous oxide from nitrogen fertilizers).

INM offers a climate-smart solution, improving the resilience of soybean cropping systems while minimizing their carbon footprint. For instance, by encouraging biological nitrogen fixation and reducing synthetic nitrogen inputs, INM helps lower nitrous oxide emissions. Moreover, practices that build soil organic carbon through composting and cover cropping also contribute to carbon sequestration.


Challenges and Considerations

While the benefits are well-documented, successful adoption of INM in soybean cultivation faces several challenges:

  • Knowledge gaps among farmers regarding balanced nutrient management.

  • Limited access to quality biofertilizers and organic inputs.

  • Need for localized research to develop crop- and soil-specific INM recommendations.

  • Policy and subsidy structures that still heavily favor chemical fertilizer use.

Addressing these requires an integrated effort involving extension services, research institutions, policy reforms, and private sector partnerships to make INM technologies accessible, affordable, and scalable.


Moving Forward: Policy and Practice

To mainstream INM in soybean farming, especially in regions with fragile agro-ecosystems, the following steps are recommended:

  • Capacity Building and Farmer Training: Extension programs should focus on training farmers in INM principles and application techniques.

  • Incentives for Organic and Bio-based Inputs: Policies that promote composting, vermiculture, and biofertilizer production can support the availability of sustainable inputs.

  • Investment in Research and Innovation: Continuous R&D is needed to refine INM packages tailored to different soybean-growing zones.

  • Monitoring and Evaluation Tools: Implementing soil health cards and digital advisory platforms can guide farmers on nutrient needs more precisely.


Conclusion

Improving soybean yield and oil productivity through Integrated Nutrient Management is more than an agronomic technique—it is a pillar of sustainable agriculture. By blending tradition with technology, INM empowers farmers to increase productivity while preserving the environment. As the global community pushes toward food security, climate resilience, and ecological balance, INM stands out as a proven and scalable solution—especially in crops as strategically important as soybean.

Adopting and promoting this approach will not only help meet present demands but also secure a healthier planet for future generations.

Follow the Topic

Agriculture
Life Sciences > Biological Sciences > Agriculture
Sustainability
Research Communities > Community > Sustainability
Agronomy
Life Sciences > Biological Sciences > Agriculture > Agronomy
Soil Science
Life Sciences > Biological Sciences > Agriculture > Soil Science
Environmental Sciences
Physical Sciences > Earth and Environmental Sciences > Environmental Sciences
Plant Science
Life Sciences > Biological Sciences > Plant Science

What are SDG Topics?

An introduction to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Topics and their role in highlighting sustainable development research.

Continue reading announcement

Related Collections

With Collections, you can get published faster and increase your visibility.

Circadian rhythms in plants and algae

Circadian rhythms are finely balanced, intrinsic biological clocks that regulate a wide range of physiological processes and enable all organisms to synchronize biological processes with the environment and the predictable 24-hour cycle of day and night. In plants and algae, for instance, circadian rhythms play a crucial role in the modulation of growth and development, flowering time, metabolism and nutrient uptake. These endogenous clocks are governed by complex molecular mechanisms, involving multiple and specialized photoreceptors, and transcriptional, post-transcriptional, translational and post-translational regulation. Recent advances in multi-omics and molecular biology approaches have allowed researchers to delve deeper into the role of circadian clocks in different plant species and (micro)algae, including non-model plant and algal species. Investigating how circadian rhythms function in photosynthetic organisms is fundamentally relevant and timely, for instance, to understand how they affect plant physiology and ecology, while also holding clear potential for agriculture and biotechnology. Novel insights into circadian clock regulation can indeed help in discovering new approaches for bioengineering the plant/algal circadian clocks e.g. to increase photosynthetic efficiency, resource utilization and crop yield, or enhance resilience to environmental stressors.

In support of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goal 2 (SDG 2: Zero Hunger) and 13 (SDG 13: Climate Action), BMC Plant Biology presents the collection Circadian rhythms in plants and algae. This Collection invites research on circadian rhythms and their mechanisms of regulation in photosynthetic organisms. Research on circadian clocks with implications for sustainable agriculture, crop/algal improvement, and potential biotechnological applications will also be considered. We invite submissions of research articles that explore, but are not limited to, the following topics:

  • Mechanisms and regulation of circadian rhythms in plants and algae, including studies conducted on non-model plant and algal species
  • Regulation of plant/algal circadian rhythms by photoreceptors (e.g. cryptochromes and phytochromes)
  • Transcriptional, post-transcriptional, translational and post-translational regulation of circadian rhythms in plants and algae
  • The role and impact of circadian rhythms on photosynthesis
  • The role and impact of circadian rhythms on metabolism in plants and algae
  • Circadian regulation of plant development, flowering, senescence and other photoperiodic processes
  • Adaptation of circadian clocks to abiotic and biotic stress, and environmental changes, in plants and algae
  • Epigenetic regulation of circadian rhythms in plants and algae
  • Regulation of plant immunity and defense response by circadian rhythms
  • Regulation of abiotic stress responses by circadian rhythms
  • Evolution of circadian rhythms in photosynthetic organisms
  • Biotechnological applications and bioengineering of circadian rhythms for crop and algal improvement (e.g. yield, metabolism, stress resilience)
  • Integrative multi-omics approaches to study circadian rhythms in plants and algae, including field studies and large-scale time-series
  • Modelling approaches to study circadian rhythms and predict gene expression profiles in complex field conditions

All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer-review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Mar 01, 2027

Plant carbon metabolism

Carbon metabolism is central to the growth, development and productivity of photosynthetic organisms. It involves dynamic regulation and interplay between a number of complex processes (e.g. photosynthesis, carbon use and storage, respiration, nutrient metabolism), response and adaptation to environmental cues and stress (e.g. light, CO2 content, temperature), as well as the integration of fine-tuned enzymatic activity, post-translational modifications and signalling pathways.

Over the past decades, much research has been carried out to understand carbon fixation and utilization in model plants/crops, as well as other photosynthetic organisms. Advancing our understanding of the working principles and regulation of key enzymes like Rubisco, the Calvin–Benson–Bassham (CBB) cycle, C3, C4, and CAM metabolism, carbon concentrating mechanisms (CCMs), or how specific micro-compartments and organelles facilitate carbon concentration, has fundamental relevance. Moreover, the engineering of carbon metabolism has the potential to help addressing current global challenges linked to food security and climate change. For instance, novel insights into carbon metabolism regulation can inform breeding strategies to enhance crop yield and resilience by optimizing photosynthetic efficiency and carbon utilization, and lead to metabolic engineering of photosynthetic (micro)organisms with improved carbon fixation.

In support of the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goal 2 (SDG 2: Zero Hunger), BMC Plant Biology launches the Collection Plant carbon metabolism. This Collection invites research addressing the mechanisms and regulation of plant carbon metabolism, including research that explores new applications and approaches to modulate carbon metabolism and enhance the yield and stress resilience in crops and photosynthetic organisms (e.g. micro/macroalgae, cyanobacteria). We invite researchers and experts in the field to submit research articles that explore, but are not limited to, the following topics:

  • C3, C4 and CAM metabolism in photosynthetic organisms: diversity, regulation and evolution
  • Mechanisms and regulation of the Calvin-Benson-Bassham (CBB) cycle in photosynthetic organisms
  • Synthesis, assembly, mechanisms and activity regulation of Rubisco
  • Functions and diversity of carbon-concentrating mechanisms (CCMs) in photosynthetic organisms
  • Functions, working principles and diversity of micro-compartments and organelles that facilitate carbon concentration in photosynthetic organisms (e.g. carboxysome, pyrenoid)
  • Mechanisms and regulation of carbon allocation (e.g. starch and sucrose metabolism)
  • Mechanisms and regulation of the central carbon metabolism, e.g. glycolysis, Oxidative Pentose Phosphate pathway, the Tricarboxylic Acid (TCA) cycle in photosynthetic organisms
  • Metabolic engineering of carbon metabolism to enhance yield and stress resilience in photosynthetic organisms
  • Synthetic biology approaches to enhance carbon fixation
  • Impact of environmental stress on carbon metabolism
  • Regulation of plant carbon assimilation metabolism by post-translational modifications
  • Role of plant secondary metabolites in carbon metabolism regulation

All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer-review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.

Publishing Model: Open Access

Deadline: Sep 04, 2026